Civil Disobedience Is Wrong Essay

Civil Disobedience has been around for hundreds of years. This a practice first put into play by a man by the name of Henry David Thoreau who believed that if you didn’t agree with a rule then you should act against it in a nonviolent way, and be willing to accept any punishment that comes with it. His teachings were followed by famous activists such as Ghandi, and Martin Luther King Jr., and many others.

In a letter written by Martin Luther King, Jr, described a just law as “a man-made code that squares with the moral law… and unjust as any law that degrades human personality” (Kessler 211). Any unjust law should be challenged because I think that everyone should be treated equally in the eyes of the law. When one challenges the law they are participating in civil disobedience, as they don’t want to obey the law they believe is unjust. It takes brave people to be disobedient and stand up for those who cannot stand up for themselves. Taking into consideration Martin Luther King, Jr, he was detained for participating in a non-violent protest against segregation. Civil disobedience is just when one is standing up for the greater good peacefully within the bounds of the law.

Martin Luther King, Jr. defines civil disobedience as the act of nonviolently refusing to obey unjust laws as a form of protest, usually resulting in accepting the consequences of

"One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws." Martin Luther King's words, which just correspond with the above assertion, perfectly tell us what to do in face of laws, either just or unjust.

Martin Luther King used the same idea of unjust laws to justify his actions and nonviolent campaigns. He used this idea to answer the question of how he can support the breaking of some laws, but not others? His simple answer was that there are two types of laws, just and unjust, and "an unjust law is no law at all." (80). He goes on to quote St. Thomas Aquinas, ."..Any law that uplifts personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust." (80) and says that any individual that breaks an unjust law and accepts the punishment of imprisonment actually has the "highest respect for the law." (81). King makes a very strong point in distinguishing just and unjust laws to advocate his actions, just like Stanton and Anthony do in their address.

What is civil disobedience? Civil disobedience is the opposing of a law one finds unjust by refusing to follow it and accepting the consequences. So many people have performed acts of civil disobedience from Martin Luther King Jr. to everyday people. But what people did as civil disobedience a hundred years ago is completely different today. It is such an important part of a free society because it helps to define what a free society is, shows the true meaning of freedom of speech, and shows the government that citizens are not willing to follow an unjust law without violence.

Civil disobedience is the refusal to conform to a society or a set of laws. Civil disobedience has come a long way from its beginning. It has been developing and will continue for generations to come, as it is considered a duty of a person. The opinions and beliefs of civil disobedience cultured in our society by both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. are still present in our modern-day society; nevertheless, these opinions and beliefs still need to be expanded in order to keep up with the fast-growing population.

In Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter from a Birmingham Jail," he highlights upon the fact that is is the people's duty to abide by just laws and rebel against unjust laws: "One may well ask: 'How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?' The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.

Civil disobedience is the refusal to obey laws, in hopes to get them changed for the better of humanity/ civilization of that specific or general community. Malala Yousafzai is a great example of civil disobedience. The whole reason she was shot in 2012 was because she dared to ‘fight’ back against the taliban by going to school and trying to make other countries aware of the harm that the taliban was causing to the homes and lives of her people.

Our nation was built on civil disobedience and it has always been a privilege we have held high. It is for this very reason why the First Amendment of our Constitution outlines the right to a peaceful protest among other rights most important to us. But over time, some members of our nation have lost sight of this liberty and see peaceful resistance as nothing more than groups of people who have no respect for the law. But civil disobedience is not doing whatever you want, whenever you want. Civil disobedience is actively protesting what is morally wrong and is the way to a more free and just society.

In American history, civil disobedience has been a key technique to initiate change in the areas like the Civil Rights Movement and the Women’s Suffrage Movement. In both of these movements the activists followed the basic

Eye catcher… Civil disobedience is an active refusal to obey (laws, demands, and commands). It can be from disagreeing with your parents to breaking a law. Civil disobedience is a negative force when the public is misinformed, breaking laws, punishments way out of hand for the situation, and misinterpret what is or is not civil.

This paper accentuates the essence of civil disobedience in the indelible progression of the major civil rights movements throughout the history of America and even more so, analyzes the substantial advancements in all human civil rights of the United States throughout time in respect to the prominence of civil disobedience. Foremost, this essay construes the understanding and the privileges that are associated with one’s civil rights and correspondingly clarifies the evident, underlying significance of civil disobedience with reference to the renowned civil rights leader, Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Junior. To further express the significant role that civil disobedience has played in molding the civil rights in the history of America,

Ban animal cruelty! Give aid to the poor! Save the rainforests! Obey the law! As a human race we must strive to fulfill these commands, for they are our moral duties and obligations. Our obligation to morality sometimes leads to a dilemma. What happens when a law contradicts the morally right thing to do? Would it be moral to act illegally by breaking the law? No matter how drastic the measure, we are still required to act morally--even if one must break the law to do so. But why is it so important to be moral that one could justify something as serious as breaking the law?

Civil disobedience is a form of political participation because it is a way make others see that change is wanted. In the Constitution it says “the right of the people peaceably to assemble”. The Constitution gives the people the right to protest, assemble peacefully, to oppose a law, and to criticize a law. Civil disobedience is the best way to show that you don’t agree with a law, government, or there is something you would like to protest.