Essay on Ethics of Civil Disobedience

Hypothesis and overview of the essay (approximately 1 to 2 pages) This section should focus on using clear, concise writing to introduce your argumentative position based on the "Moral Instinct" editorial.

The subject of morality and ethics is a topic that so many individuals have difficulty understanding: and practicing. Many factor come in to place when thinking of one’s knowledge to treat or behave in an ethical and moral way to consider the feeling of others. Thus, an individual’s culture, religion, and environment may hinder the general idea of morality. In the interview of Martin Luther King Jr: Speech Civil Disobedience and obeying Just vs Unjust laws; he discusses how some laws that have been created: do not make right just because there laws. Likewise, Michael Pollan: An Animal’s Place talks about animal cruelty, and how animals should been have the same rights as human beings. Additionally, new laws can be created to adjust to new ethical and moral laws; that would benefit the way of living for humans and animals.

Why do we neglect any ethical principles? According to the basics of utilitarianism, human deeds focus on common welfare. When we turn into spy’s and follow our family members, we hope that it will work in favor of our family welfare and common utility. We can compare home spying with domestic surveillance to show how ethical principles work in this area. “As a matter of fact, domestic surveillance focuses on potential crime prevention. On the other hand, intelligence violates the principles of a personal freedom and breaks into a private territory of people surrounding us.” (Domestic Surveillance) We show our unethical behavior and violate the principles of respect and tolerance to other people. Our selfish motives may be destructive for people around us. Ethical egoism occurs when individual underlines that his own selfish interest is the most important for him. We pay attention for surveillance at home, when we want to compensate the lack of attention of our loved person to us. We want to find the root of evil and try to become real spies and find out something horrible and destructive as soon as possible to entertain ourselves. In such a way, we try to compensate our selfish interests. We think that if to follow our beloved ones or children, we will have a chance to know their real lives. Faraz states: “We do not think about their interest; we want to feel calmness and be sure in the coming day. This last motive is dominant

To the question, "Why should I be moral?" there is a simple answer (SA) that some philosophers find tempting. There is also a response, common enough to be dubbed the standard response (SR), to the simple answer. In what follows I show that SA and SR are unsatisfactory; they share a serious defect.

Self-interest plays a motivator role in morality field that makes people can consider themselves without destroying the ability of others to meet their own wants. Starting with some key terms that Smiths mentions in his books: selfishness means someone who only knows to satisfy himself without consider others’ feelings and it might deprives others’ happiness (Black 2006, p.8). Comparing to selfishness, the term ‘self-love’ means ‘pure ego’ (Fitzgibbons 1995, p.137), while the term ‘self-interest’ is an updated version of self-love, because it contains virtue and leads to self-love into a moral level (Fitzgibbons 1995,

when we know that we can reap tremendous benefit from acting immorally?” Moreover, why should we do the “right” thing if we can do the “wrong” thing and get away with it? None of us will likely have the opportunity to become invisible, but we all certainly have had and will be faced with situations in which we stand to benefit personally and/or professionally from immoral actions that can easily go overlooked or for which there are no negative consequences. What, then, motivates or should motivate us to avoid moral wrong-doing and to undertake that which is morally good(Williams & Arrigo)?

Throughout history and for as long as humankind has existed we can understand that Natural law is contributed to Devine Command Theory. Both ethics and morality can come in hand with the Devine Command Theory which is the foundation of religion. Devine command theory is the “meta-ethical theory which proposes that an action being morally good is equivalent to being commanded by God. The theory asserts that moral knowledge cannot be had except from God because morality is based on what God commands.” (Hector, 2009) Philosophically, I believe that certain rights or values are inherent by human nature, that laws and command both exist to serve as a guide in humanity they are a pattern for someone’s actions and behavior both representing either

The Core of American Freedoms have always been incorporated within the wills of the people. So pounded into today's society of younger population that we are free to choose our own paths and morals is all fundamentally linked to the practice of civil disobedience. If we don't agree with a law, we protest it. Civil disobedience as a whole in the long-run has shown to be a positive power that has moved our government and society for the better.

Morality is a concept that most people feel they have a good grasp on; however, when confronted on what exactly is morality, many fail to give an adequate description on what it is and why it is important. There are philosophers who have taken on this task, and as expected disagree, with valid arguments, what morality is and why it is important. Morality is explained by three philosophers as: a cultural tool that his subject specified with importance only to the culture being applied, by using the Utilitarianism theory to explain what moral is and its importance as a tool for serving the greatest majority, and that morality is determined by one’s motive because it follows one’s duty to society. Respectively, Rachels, Mill, and Kant differ with

Moral motivation speaks to an individual’s ability to follow through on a selected course of action. This can prove difficult based on the potential ramifications of taking action. Tapping into one’s moral emotions, both positive and negative, can help motivate an individual to engage in ethical problem solving. Other ways to increase moral motivations include rewarding oneself and others for ethical behavior and considering the ethical principles of an organization before participating (Johnson 2009).

Ethical Egoism is a normative claim; it believes that individuals should always in their best interest. Another view of ethical egoism is that a person should act according to his own self-interest even if it goes against the values and beliefs of others.

Morals are especially important in society because they keep things in balance. Take this personal experience for example, I believe cheating is unacceptable, although sometimes I am conflicted because people are extremely desperate; I never ease in. If people were to start cheating on every signal task they are given then no one would

person is not they will continue to obey because at least this way they feel as if they are a

Being moral is a choice free from both internal and external factors. Unless we have some convincing reasons for being moral, there is no point in enquiring what is morally good and what is not. This question concerns reasons than causes. Also one must realize that being moral involves self denial. For example a moral person must not take BRIBE, but another person who is not moral and takes bribes may turn out to be in a financially better position. So, moral obligations lead to sacrificing of ones personal interests. So we need to justify the necessity to be moral. There are many reasons which justify being moral. A few of them are

Primarily, as I have just mentioned, both legal and moral obligations are directive in nature. They both prescribe certain courses of action, and place demands upon the individual. As Pink clarifies, ‘obligation…seems, like law, to be to do with direction – with getting people to do things or refrain from doing them or refrain from certain things’ . Often, legal and moral obligations overlap. A good example of this is ‘do not kill’, both a law of our society, and by almost all moral systems, an obligation (without bringing in special circumstances). Further, both contain a notion