preview

Clinician Assessment Of CAS

Good Essays

To conduct a thorough assessment, Peña-Brooks and Hedge (2015, pp. 311-313) suggest that the clinician test both imitative and non-imitative speech production skills and intelligibility of speech. Peña-Brooks and Hedge also recommend that the clinician assess for prosody, resonance and fluency problems, as these errors are common with CAS. While the above criteria are helpful in evaluating CAS, it can still be challenging to differentiate CAS from other disorders. A recent study (Murray, Mccabe, Heard, & Ballard, 2014) set out to address this challenge and develop a set of objective measures that would facilitate differential diagnosis. The study found that accurate differential diagnosis of CAS may be possible using an evaluation of only …show more content…

However, a 2008 review by McCauley and Strand found the tests were lacking in documentation to support their reliability and validity. Furthermore, McCauley and Strand found the tests “overly broad” and inattentive to “relevant psychometric principles.” Based on the lack of available validated assessment criteria and the high variability of the symptoms, clinicians will likely need flexible materials and procedures when evaluating a child for suspected CAS. The best approach to assessment of CAS is likely staying abreast of all current and past research so the clinician can adapt to the individual needs of …show more content…

However, the lack of diagnostic criteria, unknown etiology, and unreliable research on treatment efficacy may also be partially due to the variable nature of the disorder. The Forrest survey (2003) demonstrated the level of disagreement among clinicians about the most characteristic features of CAS. In light of this disagreement, I speculate that further research will result in a new understanding of the disorder, or possibly even further classification into multiple sub-disorders. Furthermore, I wonder if the emphasis on early diagnosis both from insurance companies and the IDEA ’04 may have a significant role in, not only the increase in prevalence, but also the confusion about characteristics of the disorder. The research suggests that the disorder may be being misdiagnosed due to early diagnosis, and if so, then the clinicians doing the misdiagnosing may be associating incorrect characteristics with the disorder. If these same clinicians then report their fallible findings to other clinicians, the misinformation spreads and becomes “common knowledge,” thereby compounding the

Get Access