Cochlear implants are good and bad. The good can provide sound to those who are severely deaf. The earlier the implant the better chance of the person being able to hear. It takes time for a person with cochlear implants for their brain to learn and develop. Cochlear implants can give others a whole new meaning of life based off of the sounds they may be hearing around them. Cochlear implants can also be bad if the tests are done and the tests don’t show if the implants are going to have a positive effect on the patient. The surgery can have complications that could cause an infection. The procedure could also potentially permanently destroy whatever hearing was left before the procedure. Cochlear implants are also very expensive and not everyone
Cochlear implants cost much more then a hearing aid. Insurance companies don’t cover the cost of hearing aids however; most companies do cover the cost of getting a cochlear implant. Figuring out the average price of a cochlear implant includes evaluation, the implant itself, surgery and rehabilitation. The total cost including these four things is $40,000.00. Most people think that the fee is well worth it.
Cochlear Implants are an object that is very controversial in the deaf community. “A Cochlear Implants is a device that provdes direct electrical stimulation to the auditory (hearing) nerve in the inner ear.” (“Cochlear Implants”) Cochlear Implants bypass the damaged hair cells, and directly stimulate the auditory nerve. Depending on when the Cochlear Implant is implanted it allows people to hear sounds, and sometimes even their own voice. While it does not cure hearing loss or deafness, it does allow people to hear. On more technical terms a Cochlear Implant includes parts like a microphone, speech processor, and a transmitter which each play a different part in the Cochlear Implant. The microphone picks up sounds, sends them to the speech processer, and then the speech processor analyzes and digitized the sound signal, thus sending them to a transmitter worn on the head. The debate of whether or not Cochlear Implants are right in the deaf community is one that has been going on for years. People believe having Cochlear Implants are a good thing, because they allow deaf people to communicate with hearing people, it allows people who are not helped by conventional hearing aids to be helped, and it creates new possibilities for deaf people. However there are also people that argue that having a Cochlear Implant is a bad thing, because it proposes the idea that deaf people need to be fixed, it can give deaf people false hope, and it proposes the idea that deaf people have a
A Cochlear Implant is an electronic device that partially restores hearing in people who have severe hearing loss due to damage of the inner ear and who receive limited benefit from hearing aids (http://www.cochlear.com/wps/wcm/connect/au/home/understand/hearing-and-hl/hl-treatments/cochlear-implant). In some cases there are patients whose hearing did not adjust correctly, having a risk of developing a virus, complications after the surgery, the benefits of sign language without a cochlear implant and lastly children or adults with cochlear implants may not even develop a good speech. There are many positive and negative articles I have read on cochlear implants. As a parent you are not only putting your child at risk, you are also withdrawing them from the deaf community, the one they were naturally born into. I do not support cochlear implants, children should not be implanted until they are grown to the point where they can make their own choice
A cochlear implant is an implanted medical device for the deaf or hard of hearing that do not benefit from the traditional hearing aid. It is composed of an internal device that is implanted in the recipient’s head and an external device that is the sound processor. The sound processor collects sound and then transmits it to the implanted device, which then sends it directly to the brain to be interpreted as language. During the time that I was choosing a hearing solution for my daughter I experienced a lot of negative opinions from the deaf culture (community of deaf people who share sign language among other things). They seem to be against parents choosing to have their small children implanted. The deaf culture presumes
Those that oppose cochlear implants argue mostly from a minority standpoint. The deaf community feels that as the minority, the hearing majority is threatening their way of life. “The deaf community is a culture. They’re much like the culture of the Hispanic community, for example, where parents who are Hispanics, or shall we say deaf, would naturally want to retain their family ties by their common language, their primary language, which is
1-To begin with, I’m going to state 3 different moral theories in which each one has their own arguments about the permissibility of abortions. In the article by Harvest Thomson, she discusses an analogy comparing a violinist who is connected to a person that was kidnapped. Her kidney can function properly with the blood of the kidnapped person attached to it, but if for any reason the violinist is disconnected, she will die. In this case, the author is using this analogy to compare a woman that has been raped and has gotten pregnant. Furthermore, why is this woman obligated to have a child she was forced to have? In both cases, neither are obligated to do this, which is what the author is trying to point out. The person who was kidnapped
According to the Deaf Culture Centre, Deaf Culture is defined as the “heart of the Deaf community everywhere in the world. Language and culture are inseparable. They are intertwined and passed down through generations of Deaf people.” It is estimated that nearly 20 percent of Americans live with some form of hearing loss, yet deaf and hard of hearing society members remain oppressed by the mainstream culture (Callis). These people that identify with the deaf culture, use American Sign Language (ASL) to communicate. ASL is a combination of hand signs and facial expressions that are unique to the Deaf community. Deaf people view deafness as a blessing and a unique way to live life. They are very proud and prideful. In the Deaf culture, the decision of getting a cochlear implant has been controversial for many years.
There are many things that people in the hearing world take for granted every day, such as verbal communication, using a telephone or something as simple as the feeling you get when your favorite song comes on the radio. To a person that has been completely immersed in the deaf community, it may be easy to view the sense of sound as unnecessary. As a member of the haring community it would seem nearly impossible to live a day without sound. Cochlear implants are devices that help a person who is deaf gain hearing to some degree, and in some cases nearly full hearing. This new technology has become very controversial throughout both the hearing, and the deaf world.
Deafness or hard of hearing, is defined by the medical society as a disability, but those who are diagnosed with the disability think otherwise. They think of themselves as a community, embrace it as an identity, or a culture with their own language, sign language, and they believe their community is being threaten. They label themselves as a minority endangered of being wiped out because of one leading cause, cochlear implants. Those serious about their ideals of their community see cochlear implants as a threat, because cochlear implants are considered as cure. Countless number of controversies over cochlear implants have been brought up, but the Deaf community should see cochlear implants as gift for patients rather than an extreme threat.
In the matter surrounding cochlear implants, Tucker would strongly agree that deaf children and other deaf individuals can truly benefit from this implant. She feels as though these implants can only better one’s quality of life, especially for children. She also believes that only positive opportunities and success and come from cochlear implants so the earlier a child is introduced to the hearing world, the more success the child will experience throughout life. To resolve this dilemma that Sean and Mary are having consider their child, Tucker would propose that parents should ultimately choice what is right for their child and their child’s future and not what is right for others/communities. One reason why Tucker feels cochlear implants
One emotion I felt when the parents and grandparents spoke to each other about the cochlear implant was how stunned I was about what they said to each other. I thought I probably felt this way because I am not deaf and no one is deaf in my family either so I would not really understand how they felt. However,
My decision for my child if they are indeed born deaf is to not get the implant. I would like to let my child learn everything that they can about who they are. Although cochlear implants are more beneficial for a child at a young age the cochlear implant may still help any child at any age. I chose not to implant my child because they can make that choice when they are 15 or 1 years of age. With persistence and hard work they can grow in learning how to speak with the cochlear implant.
My theoretical deaf child would receive a Cochlear Implant, for many reasons such as, they would be able to communicate in both ASL and English, could be safer, have more opportunities, and my insurance covers a Cochlear Implant. The child would hopefully receive the implant by the age of one year old because the brain is still building its
Although I was conscious that Deaf and deaf have different meanings, I was not aware what was the difference between the two. I was very stunned to learn about Amos Kendall. I had no idea that Kendall donated the land that Gallaudet University was built on. It was really wonderful finding out all of the information on Gallaudet University and its history and how it came to be.
When faced with having to make a major decision for their children, parents are often thrown into a difficult and perplexing situation. These decisions become even more difficult for the parents when the decision involves putting their children through something they cannot relate to. This is the case when parents are required to decide whether to have cochlear implant surgery performed on their deaf child. The decision of whether to go through with this procedure, which, when successful, provides a deaf individual with the ability to hear, puts parents in a position to make an epistemically and personally transformative decision for their child. Ultimately, the decision comes down to the experiences and preferences of the parents; whether