Introduction
Colgate-Palmolive (CP): Colgate Max Fresh – Global Brand Roll-Out
This case study examines Colgate-Palmolive’s approach to a global marketing launch of Colgate Max Fresh (CMF) after having shown a record 34.8% value share in the U.S. market in 2005, ahead of Proctor & Gamble (P&G) which was in 2nd place with 31.6% value share.
The shares being strong and their president of global oral care, Nigel Burton, had every reason to be optimistic that the proposed marketing launch plans for CMF in China and Mexico would maximize the business potential in the local markets. Both launch plans are departures from the CMF program for the U.S.A. launch six months prior. Burton needs to assess if the plans and costs to adapt the CMF
…show more content…
Critical analysis of the US launch
1. Positioning: CMF was positioned as a premium brand. It was positioned midway between offering therapeutic as well as cosmetic benefits, promising freshness with whitening reassurance, using the mini-breath strips as the reason.
2. Pricing: It was priced at par with CWE.
3. Marketing - Product: Using gel-tubes and liquid- bottles (transparent) created a visual impact when placed on the retail shelf. Offered in two flavors; blue Cool Mint and green Clean Mint. Package visuals, In-store sampling, merchandising displays, sales promotions, rebates, bogos, and two-pack trial packs.
4. Advertising/Marketing: Accounted for 73% of the Year 1 marketing budget. Targeting adults 18-34 age group utilizing:
a. Media: To create awareness – celebrity endorsements ‘Emily Protor’ - “looking beyond the obvious’
b. Website – incorporating ‘Emily Proctor’ promotions.
c. Program sponsorships on MTV, AOL Music, AOL First Look, and Yahoo Launch.
The reality is that the U.S. Marketing team took little or no account of the global transferability of their program. They simply sought to develop the best possible marketing program for the U.S. This becomes apparent once the Mexico and China launch is introduced. The U.S. advertising was, most obviously, country-specific because the
The industry has found that consumers aged 15 to 34 years account for 33% of the
In studying the current situation and preparing for a strategic plan, Gwen Hearst reviewed the available information for the mouthwash market and Scope.
Overall, Scope has a strong presence in the market for mouthwash. It has the leading market share in the Canadian market. Consumers that purchase Scope do so because it is better tasting than other mouthwashes that prevent bad breath. Scope excels in food stores, but has room to increase sales in drugstores because that is where most mouthwash purchases occur. With the introduction of Plax, Scope’s market share could potentially be threatened. The market is shifting towards health related benefits of mouthwash and not just fresh breath and good taste.
Hearst and the business team have three options, on one hand a line extension or new product positioned against Plax could be introduced into the market and in the other hand doing nothing and just looking at claims other than “breath” instead of adding a new product. Launching a new product “new pre-brushing rinse,” for example would cannibalize a part of Scope sales, also the delivery, marketing and capital costs of P&G will increase if a new rinse was launched and the user of Scope would be confused since he/she saw in the old scope a breath refreshment, taking into consideration that the new rinse is not any better than Plax in reducing plaque, but at the same time it may increase the market share of P&G and increase its profit. Whereas adding a new claim for Scope would not increase the volume of sales, but it could prevent current users of Scope to switch and it would stabilize the
Procter and Gamble Co. also know as P&G, is an American multinational consumer goods company, founded by William Procter and James Gamble. Its products include cleaning agents and personal care products. It has in its kitty global brands such as Ariel and Tide in the Fabric care segments and Head & Shoulder, Pantene and Rejoice is the Hair care segment. For this case study selects P&G Company as it has an important role in the consumer segment products. As P&G was a popular company, the financials statement shows better performance in the previous year.
The management team at the over-the-counter cold medicine (OCM) group of Allstar Brands is looking to utilize revenue generated by Allround to help fund new opportunities in emerging markets. Therefore, it is critical that Allround maintain its market-leading position in terms of market share, profitability, and sales in order to fund these new initiatives.
Colgate-Palmolive Co (CP) was an international leader in household and personal care product, with the sales of $6.06 billion and profit of $2.76 billion in 1991. CP set up a five-year plan in 1991, pointing out that company needed to focus on new product launching and entry into new geographic markets by improving the manufacturing, distribution and the continuance of the core consumer products. Started from 1984, CP’s CEO awaked the company from “sleepy and inefficient” to profitable. Both gross margin and annual volume growth increased from 1985. Although everything seemed good, CP was facing the worldwide strong competitions from other companies. In order to have some protections, 170 CP’s
After 2000 Makrolon enjoyed much success by using different segments, ranging from roofing, surface coating, and medical technology to car windows. Their diversity and marketing tool of “Ingredient branding” paid off. Their new branding concept that required the component was used for high-class care products labeled with the Makrolon logo put Makrolon at a competitive advantage.
C) The key consumer segment is the younger drinker who aged 21 to 27. They were first time drinker that not founded loyalty to any brand yet accounted for large beer consumption. The segment tended to purchase more light beer instead of lager.
So her specific task was to prepare a marketing plan for P&G mouthwash business for the next 3 years. In preparing the 3 year plan for Scope, a team has been formed within P&G to examine various options, the team included individuals from product development, manufacturing, sales, finance, market research and advertising operations. The team was faced by two options that are: 1- Launching a new line extension positioned against Plax as a recent entry into the market. 2- Looking at claims other than “breath” that might be used by scope such as plaque reduction.
Proctor and Gamble-Scope is faced with a very important decision, they need to prepare a marketing plan for P&G’s mouthwash business for the next three years. They want to know how they are going to be able to
If Clorox does not restructure its portfolio mix and increase revenue contribution from the growing markets, it faces the risk of losing sales and its position in those markets. Using its current resources, Clorox needs to determine how to allocate those resources among its current brand portfolio. Equally important is determining whether to invest in new product lines or brands. Clorox also has to decide whether to expand into international markets or focus strictly on expanding its market share across its brands in the primary U.S. market. Asian, South American, and European markets offer potential for growth but the cost of expanding into these markets and the limited availability of financial resources pose concerns with respect to international expansion. Focus on growth versus profitability is another important strategic decision that needs to be addressed. Clorox projects flat sales for 2011, which is not a positive indicator for investors’
The main issue of the P&G Korea case is centered around the question of market share. P&G and Unilever are the two major market shareholders in the Korean detergent industry holding 80-85% of the total market share. The remaining 15-20% of the market is held by low-priced local Korean brands. There are no new markets either company can tap for further market share since most Korean households already use laundry detergent, making the market saturated. Other than peripheral chemical changes claimed to be “improvements”, there are no major innovations to be explored for product development or diversification. Per Ansoff’s strategic opportunities matrix, P&G and Unilever are both focused on Market Penetration,
By increasing successful and ideal operations and strengthening relationships with their customers, companies existing in this market diminish the significance of threat over newly accepted competitors. Toothpaste companies are still growing strongly, therefore additional firms are trying to enter the market to benefit from the increasing profits. However, most toothpaste companies have already made their name and their customers stay loyal to their brand, therefore it is hard to get into this market. With toothpaste being such a popular item and an essential in households,
Culture has progressed with many consumer merchandises that have become necessities and transformed into the day-to-day routines of society without having to think twice about it. CP or Colgate-Palmolive, is an icon for the personal hygiene industry throughout the United States, and as a worldwide company has positioned the brand as a most important home care in multiple foreign countries.The CMF line is CP’s most popular brand. The brand was a huge hit because of its individuality and the value that it crafted for consumers was astonishing. Colgate Max combined a new breath-strip and a mixture of therapeutics’, which added to more