College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

College athletes should not be paid to play the given sport they participate in. And as of right now, this statement stands true for the most part but is starting to become blurred and pushed extremely hard for. Over the years the NCAA and other organizations have had many conventions and uproars over the subject of whether or not college athletes should or should not be paid. The main two sports that this debate come up in are men's college basketball and college football, especially during march madness and the college football national championship. Now, I respect anyone who puts in the time, work, and excitement college athletics bring to the world or sports, but they should not be paid.

There is always that question being asked about whether or not college athletes should be paid. The article College Athletes Getting Paid? Here Are Some Pros And Cons from the “Huffington Post” by Malcolm Lemmons argues that there is no right or wrong answer to the question at hand. However, to some the idea of college athletes being paid is absurd, while to others not so much. This article touches on many different factors from race to financial status of the players.

College athletes have a hard life. They have to keep up with their grades in school, and focus on sports. For all of the work they do and how much time they put in to sports, they should get paid. They should get money for working as hard as they do. College athletes shouldn’t get paid as much as a professional sports athlete, but they should get paid a descent amount. If all the colleges were paying their athletes, it would take away from their scholarship purposes.

First, many college athletes risk getting terribly hurt every game. Also, the National Collegiate Athletic Association, also known as NCAA, is bringing in extra money from sports tournaments because of them, and finally, because if they were to get paid they could be able to support their families. Studies have shown that if these athletes got paid, they would do better in many of their classes. College sports have been popular since the 1850’s but since then the athletes have not been getting paid. College athletes should be paid to play the game that they have devoted lots of time into.

One of the most popular pastimes in America is watching college sports. Whether it’s football, baseball, or basketball, these student-athletes bring fans, money, and sponsorships to their schools. So why shouldn't these athletes be paid? The answer is that student-athletes should not be paid, because they have the ability to earn scholarships or financial aid, college athletes are paid in other ways than financially, and not all schools have the money to pay them. Ultimately, paying college athletes would ruin the current culture and competitiveness of college sports.

Why College Athletes Deserved To Be Paid College is expensive and college athletes should be paid to play in order to meet their financial needs as a student. I think that all college athletes should be allowed to be paid because professional athletes get paid to play the same sport. College athletes should get paid too if they make into the playoffs. Who gets the money if they win the championships the coaches, the school, etc? Either way, the athletes do not get paid for anything.

Although researches think college players shouldn't be paid. Some of the college athletes think they should be paid. College athletes should be paid for playing college sports. Cause they don't no money, no job, and they risk getting hurt. College athletes shouldn't be paid for playing sports. Cause their scholarship is already paid for. Because they chose to play that sport. There is a whelming amount of supporting evidence about should athletes be paid.

These details prove why college athletes should not get paid. Greed and jealousy can cause among players of a college sport by paying athletes. ”College athletes are not worth a single cent in the open market.” This quote proves that universities don't need to pay college athletes a single cent. Once they are eligible to go to the professional sport like NFL or NBA thy may get

“‘I had the chance to have my education paid for at an incredible school”’ (Cooper, 12). A former Harvard basketball player, Tommy Amaker, believed that college sports are not about paying athletes, but about the chance to play the sport you love and have scholarships to play it (Cooper, 12). College athletes should not be paid. They already have scholarships. There are also many downsides and they would lose the amateur status.

College athletes should be paid for playing college sports. One of the main reasons why college athletes should be paid is because colleges have a ton of money. Just college basketball and football alone bring in over six billion dollars a year, and the majority of that is profit. There are currently 13,877 college athletes and they are paid a total of zero dollars. Today there are thousands of athletes that don’t play college sports because they are worried that they will graduate college with little to no education and more than enough debt.

College Athletes Should Not Be Paid People often debate whether college athletes should be paid or not. Some people believe they should be paid because they play as much as a full time job. Some people believe they should not get paid because they are already getting other benefits. In reality college athletes should not be paid. Some people believe that college athletes should be paid because their practise schedule is like a full time job.

Whether or not college athletes should get paid is a topic that has been heavily debated recently. Some questions that arise when debating this topic are: Where will the money come from? Will paying college athletes ultimately ruin college sports? Isn’t full scholarships enough for college athletes? College athletes of all sports, not just football, deserve to be paid.

We are all aware of the common misconception that college athletes should be paid. However, I believe that college athletes that not only should they not be paid but are undeserving of being paid. There are many things to consider and take into account when mentioning compensation and college athletes. The truth is, paying colleges athletes leads to a number of internal and external conflicts that could easily be avoided.

Both sides of this argument have a strong case for why student athletes should, or should not be compensated. The problem might not be what it looks like at first. The main problem is the amount being spent on college athletes and the rising tuition costs for these universities. Duke University 's golf team spent an estimated $20,405 per player (Branstetter). The amount of money being spent on one player on their golf team is represented in the insane amount of tuition which is 60,000 dollars a year at Duke. This is a huge reason as to why colleges are so eager to get a cut of a 60 billion dollar industry. The issue of paying student athletes is not so one sided as athletes work very hard between school and sports, or that

College athletes should be paid because of the hard work, dedication and effort they put into their respective sports. These athletes are a major source of income for their schools and they are not receiving a penny for it. These college athletes deserved to be paid, colleges are using these athletes to get money and they are never given anything but a pat on the back and a good job. College athletes work and train extremely hard to perform at the highest level possible. In most cases, they spend more time training and preparing for their sport than they actually do learning and studying. They put so much on the line to play and they get nothing in return. These college athletes literally make their schools millions of dollars every