From numerous points of view, the U.S. Constitution and Texas Constitutions are very much alike. They both epitomize the standards of delegate equitable government, in which power shows from the general population. Both contain a bill of rights that shields common freedoms from government violation. Both accommodate a dual council with a House of Representatives and a Senate. Also, both look for an arrangement of balanced governance and partition of forces between administrative, official, and legal branches of government. Not to mention they both divide government control amongst upper and lower levels of government. In the U.S. Constitution, the states are subordinate to the federal government, and in the Texas Constitution the regions are subordinate to the state government. Be that as it may, even with these general components, the two constitutions are very different as well. These distinctions result from the way …show more content…
The federal judiciary is straightforward and methodical, with three levels of courts which include, district courts, appeals courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court, the last word on all statutory and protected matters. Every single elected judge is appointed, not elected, and Supreme Court judges are selected forever, with the plan of expelling the judiciary from the pressure of electoral politics permitting insurance of minority interests in government system intended to rule. Interestingly, the Texas Judiciary is very confusing. The Texas Constitution builds up six types of courts, some of which have simultaneous or overlapping jurisdictions. Compared with the federal system one Supreme Court, the Texas Constitution builds up two high courts, one to hear common cases and one to settle criminal cases. Additionally, in the convention of Jacksonian Democracy, all Texas judges must battle with electoral politic issues and win their positions in partisan
In the United States, each of the fifty states has its own states constitution, which contains the same basic provisions as the United States Constitution; however, states constitution is generally more detailed than the national constitution.In the United States, each of the fifty states has its own states constitution, which contains the same basic provisions as the United States Constitution; however, states constitution is generally more detailed than the national constitution.In the United States, each of the fifty states has its own states constitution, which contains the same basic provisions as the United States Constitution; however, states constitution is generally more detailed than the national constitution.In the United States,
The Texas Constitution and the United States Constitution have been essential in the governing of Texas and the United States, respectively. Both documents have set limits on what the governments can and cannot do and help both governments administer their respective constituents. The Texas Constitution and the US Constitution share similarities such as the separation of powers and checks and balances; however, because of their differing histories, they have many differences such as how the executive and the judiciary are elected. These similarities and differences have led to strengths and weaknesses in the two documents, and parts of the US Constitution can help the governing of Texas, and vice versa.
Because if a constitution does not reflect the state it’s supposed to, everything else does not matter. Texas is a diverse state in constant change, and the constitution should be able to adapt to current
The U.S Constitution also contains articles the Texas Constitution doesn't. The U.S. constitution talks about what privileges the states have. The rules they have to abide by to make the nation one. In the Texas Constitution it goes more into depth about what the state wants the people to abide by. The U.S. Constitution also talks about how our
Despite, all of the revisions the Texas Constitution still has its strengths and weaknesses. The strengths it has a clear definition of restrictions on what government officials can and can’t do. It has the Bill of
Over the course of United States history, Texas has always been a peculiar state. It has had it's fair share of triumphs and downfalls, some of which were the Battle of The Alamo, the defeat of the Spanish army, and its acquisition by the United States. Although the history of Texas might seem to dominate the opinions of many, the governmental component is no different. In fact, some have debated if the very foundation of our government is a democracy or a republic. In response, and through thorough research, I have concluded that Texas is, in fact, a democracy, because there is a multitude of electoral systems, an array of elected positions that citizens can run for, and a myriad of court systems to which justice can be served.
Texas and California are two states in the US that are comparable in terms of their population, resources, size, economy and constitution. The Texas Constitution is the foundation of the statehood of Texas within which the government operates in the same way that U.S. constitution governs the affairs of the whole country with its allocated power. The Texas constitution has a huge influence on the daily lives of Texans Possibly even more than the U.S. Constitution. Although all states have its own constitution, Texas and California have different ways in which they gained their constitution. Like most state in the U.S. The state of California gained its constitution after the civil war, the constitution was ratified in 1879 and It is similar to the Texas constitution in many ways. Both constitutions are founded on the unanimous vote of its people and are grounded by the rule of
The Texas Constitution has evolved in many ways throughout history. Before the current constitution there were five predecessors. There were many factors that effected each of the five constitutions. After very long governance by Spain and Mexico and a small war with Mexico, the Texans finally won their independence. The first constitution had become official in September of 1836. This first constitution was called the Republic Of Texas Constitution. After struggling for about nine years to become apart of the Union, Texas’s second constitution was created. The Second constitution was called the Statehood Constitution and was thought to be one of the best constitutions of time. The Jacksonian Democracy greatly influenced the Statehood Constitution. The idea of the Jacksonian Democracy was to increase the people’s participation in the government. This Constitution lasted about 16 years until Texas joined the Confederate Sates of America in 1861. This third constitution was called the Civil War Constitution. The main goal was to modify the
The U.S. constitution and the Texas constitution have similarities and differences. Both constitutions have a Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is a summary of the rights given to all people. These constitutions also talk about suffrage and taxes. Just like how both of these constitutions have similarities, they also have differences. The Texas constitution is longer than the U.S. constitution and discusses the rights first. It also deals with state and local issues not brought up in the U.S. constitution. Both constitutions have a Bill of Rights, but the Texas constitution discusses citizens’ rights at the beginning of article one. The Texas Bill of Rights has the same protections for citizens like the U.S. Bill of Rights does, but the Texas Bill of Rights extends beyond federal protections. The executive branch is the branch that the president is in charge of. The definition of the executive branch is “The branch of federal and state government that is broadly
In my analysis of the Texas Constitution I will assess the three branches of our State Government, the Legislative Branch, Executive Branch and finally the Judicial Branch. Our State Government resembles our National Government in various ways but also in very different ways which we will review in this essay. I will identify a handful of criticisms and problems associated with the provisions in each of these branches of our State Government and identify suggested reforms that many feel are needed.
The Texas judicial system has been called one of the most complex in the United States, if not the world. It features five layers of courts, several instances of overlapping jurisdiction, and a bifurcated appellate system at the top level. The structure of the system is laid out in Article 5 of the Texas Constitution.
The legislative branch plays an important role in the constitution and forces legislators to let voters make the decisions and changes within the state, instead of just picking and choosing which laws or amendments they see fit to pass, or reject, regardless of the how large or small the significance or importance of the issue is. The presidential candidate, for the United States, generally chooses who his or her vice president running mate will be. Unlike the executive branch in the Texas Constitution, compared to the U.S. Constitution, those who run for political office in Texas such as the governor, who will be chief executive of the state, lieutenant governor, comptroller, commissioner of General Land Office, attorney general and members of the Texas Railroad Commission are all elected by the citizens of Texas statewide, and are not chosen or appointed by any of the officials or the governor elected. All of the governors counterparts will be elected, and key elected policy-making boards, and not personally chosen. The last branch included in the Texas constitution is the judicial branch. Article V in the constitution has three distinctive features; first is it has six different types of courts and two supreme courts (civil and criminal courts). Second, the state has different levels of trial courts and those courts can overlap each other, county
All fifty states have a constitution and the purpose of having a state constitution is to establish institutions and set broad rules and laws governing the state. There are multiple functions of having a state constitution. Texas has had seven different constitutions currently Texas is operating under the Constitution of 1876. In 1827, Texas was declared a state of Mexico. Texas’ break with Mexico was, in part, a constitutional crisis. In 1836, Texas Declaration of Independence was formed and in on March 2nd, Texas Declared an independence republic. The Constitution of the Republic of Texas of 1836 had numerous rules. Such as, slavery was allowed, there are three separate branches, and banned importing slaves from Africa. Next, there were movements
There has been seven Texas Constitutions since 1827 including our current Constitution, which was established on 1876. Our current constitution has been amended hundreds of times because of its tight restrictions. The Legislative department is the dominant branch of the Texas Constitution it is subject to check and balances in the tripartite system. The Executive department limits the government’s power, and the judicial powers is divided into smaller courts. These three branches of the Texas are examples of how restricted and limited our constitution is.
This is generally because of it being a previous British province, so its constitutional law has evolved in rather the British way. State Constitutions differ from the United States constitution, because The U.S. Constitution is solid on what to do and what not to do however gives surprisingly little direction on how to do it, however most state Constitutions all have a typical defect: they attempt to address an excessive number of themes and give an excessive number of orders to what to do and how to do it, much of the time with intense detail. Two ways in which the Constitution of Texas is different from the U.S., are that the U.S. Constitution has not been rewritten and the Texas Constitution has been rewritten several times. Also, the U.S. Constitution has strong separation of powers and strong legislative, Executive, Judicial branches, and the Texas Constitution has weak separation of powers of plural executive (the division of the governor’s power among several other elected officials) limits governor