I'm comparing and contrasting Hamilton and Burr. I think Burr would be Republican today because the party that he belonged to years ago was the Democratic-Republican party founded in 1791. This party became the Democratic Party of today. However the 1791 old party had 3 beliefs Republicanism, Jeffersonian Democracy, and State Rights. 2 out of the 3 makes me say that he is a Republican. The one belief that doesn't apply is the Jeffersonian Democracy because Jefferson wanted to have the president have the last say in any situation. Now Hamilton would be Democratic today because he believed of a loose interpretation of the Constitution. Hamilton believed that anything that wasn't written in the Constitution he could make his own decisions on. Burr on the other hand believed if it wasn't written in the Constitution it has to go back to the individual State Government to decide. I think the jobs that Burr would have today would be Military, lawyer, Attorney General, Senator, and Vice President. Now Hamilton’s jobs would be a bookkeeper, Military officer, Lawyer, and Secretary of Treasury. I think they would have these jobs because these were jobs they had before. …show more content…
However, if proper government safety rules are not followed, classified information could go into the hands of the wrong people. If Burr had an email instead of a handwritten letter he could have been found guilty of treason. In his era they only had a reprint of his letter and he was acquitted. I think Hamilton and Burr would succeed today because we still have the same form of government as we had in 1791. The three branches of government are still the same as well. Technology is the new thing in our time that they need to learn. That is the comparing and contrasting of Hamilton and
When Thomas Jefferson took office in 1801, after an intense realignment of the majority of office holders from Federalist to Anti-Federalist in the “Revolution of 1800”, there were many policies headed by former Treasurer Alexander Hamilton that were still in place. Instead of doing what would have been expected of him by his peers, and taking steps
These men, Hamilton, Burr, Jefferson, Franklin, Washington, Adams, and Madison, were important contributors to development of our country in many ways. Hamilton had tried to push policies, funding and assumption, in order to fix America’s debt problem with foreign and domestic debt and restoring America’s credit with European bankers. His policy for funding was passed, which also gave bonds that were given to soldiers but were now in rich peoples’ hands, credit. Burr was known as the father of modern political campaigning, as he helped drum up support for Jefferson during their run for the presidency. Jefferson had authored the Declaration of Independence and was also a good friend of John Adams. So good a friend, in fact, that when they were
Hamilton married a young lady by the name of Elizabeth Schuyler; she was the daughter of a general. This put Alexander Hamilton in the middle of New York’s politics. In 1782, Hamilton was elected to the Continental Congress. As Alexander Hamilton’s political career began to get under way, things seem to be going as planned. He played a major role in the constitution. He was one of America's first Constitutional lawyers, and wrote most of the Federalist Papers, a primary source for Constitutional interpretation. He was perhaps the best lawyer in America at the time of his death and his views were remarkably consistent and coherent. He also had a clear vision of the new nation and believed that it could learn much from British economic policy and governmental practice.
Two important politicians who stood up for American people passing laws which supported U.S. citizen's right under the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights were Vice President Aaron Burr and President Alexander Hamilton. These two men are important in United States history for many reasons based upon U.S. politics, war tactics, education, and family values. Furthermore, Aaron Burr was the vice president of the United States during the term of President Thomas Jefferson. Compared to Alexander Hamilton who was a member of the Mainland Congress and a writer of the Federalist Papers. He was a winner of the Constitution and the first Secretary of the Treasury. In contrast to Alexander Hamilton; in 1769 Burr enrolled in the College of New Jersey and graduated in less than three years in summa cum laude. Then he enrolled in Litchfield Law School in Connecticut but stopped due to the Revolutionary War. In 1807 he was charged with conspiracy which corrupted his political career. Aaron Burr was a member of Congress and the New York state legislature. He was a delegate of the Federal Convention of 1787. He was centrally involved in the convention which led to the U.S. Constitution being produced and later ratified in 1787 and 1788. Although he ran for U.S. President, he did not win in contrast to Hamilton. In 1790 Hamilton's Federalist Party was separated within the Washington government and the country. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison motivated Hamilton's policies and movements. In 1795 Hamilton left the treasury to practice law. He was active in federal politics because this was crucial to win the presidency of John Adams. Around 1812, he decided to study law. Burr's father was active in church and became the Presbyterian minister and the president of the College of New Jersey. In contrast, Vice President Aaron Burr and his sister was raised by their wealthy uncle because their parents passed away early. His family tree consisted of English goodness who were active in politics. On February 6, 1756, Vice President Burr was born in Newark, New Jersey. Then on September 14, 1836 Vice President Burr died on Staten Island New York. In, contrast to Alexander Hamilton
Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson were key Founding Fathers of America who contributed to its freedom and independence. Both men were influential leaders of their time whose visions for the future of the country were clearly contrasting. Hamilton believed for a strong federal government and an economy based on banking. While Jefferson desired for a nation to be controlled by the states and its people. Their competing visions for the United States are still in debate until this day. Although Jefferson’s ideas were significant to America, many of Hamilton’s philosophy still holds in today’s government.
Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson represent the polarizing ends of the political spectrum in the early days of the United States government. Traditionally, Hamilton has been viewed as being in favor of a strong central government and a loose interpretation and application of the United States Constitution while Jefferson favored a weak central government and a strict interpretation of the Constitution (Foner, 2008).
The main reason that rise to conflict between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson is their contradict ideas about the government. As a federalist supporter, Hamilton find favor in a strong central government, meanwhile, Jefferson believe in a limited government. Because his fear of mod rules, HaMilton distrusted that a government should be ruled by everyone. He acknowledge that a strong central government
Conflicting views and contrasting ideologies have always existed throughout the history of United States politics. Alexander Hamilton, who led Federalist Party, believed that a powerful central government was necessary while Thomas Jefferson, who led the Jeffersonian Republican Party, favored an agrarian nation with most of the power left to the states. Although Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson were similar in that they both harbored good intentions and tried to keep the best interests in mind for the future of the United States, their policies were drastically different. Without doubt, both of their contrasting ideas served a vital role in forming the government.
Alexander Hamilton was one of the most influential figures to shape American finances. He made his contribution through the The Hamiltonian Economic Program. The goal of his plan is to improve the American economy through three steps. The first is to pay off the nation’s national debt in order for states to focus on business. This way maximum profit can be achieved. The second step is to place tariffs on imported goods to gain money. Lastly is to create a national bank in order to regulate money flow and currency. However, Thomas Jefferson strongly disagreed with Alexander Hamilton’s views which was evidently seen in the political parties, the Democratic Republicans and the Federalists. One of the main differences between the two is regarding the type of government America would have. Hamilton favored a strong federal government while Jefferson favored a small local government.
On July 11, 1804, America tragically lost a founding forefather just after seven o’clock (Mintz and McNeil, The 1804 Duel Between Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr 2015). In as little as the blink of an eye, Colonel Aaron Burr inequitably snuffed out the life of General Alexander Hamilton in a duel which was provoked by Burr. After many years of political dissention between Burr and Hamilton, it all came to an end when Burr buried a bullet in General Hamilton’s torso. Is Vice President Burr a murderer? Most decidedly so.
Although both men were important in the Revolution and in the establishment of the United States, they did not coordinate until Washington chose Hamilton to be the Secretary of the Treasury and Jefferson to be the Secretary of State. From the beginning, the two men harbored
Before the Revolutionary War had occurred, many people were coming to the new colonies to start a new life; one of the people was Alexander Hamilton. He had come to the colonies after impressing people in the Caribbean and who then sent him to America to get a better education (“Alexander Hamilton”). Hamilton was an important figure in American history, but very few today remember who he was and what he did. Alexander Hamilton took a stand against traditional government by writing against and battling the British, fighting for the new U.S. Treasury, and arguing for the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.
In the history of America, Thomas Jefferson, the Secretary of State, and Hamilton, the Secretary of the Treasury, were two of the greatest leaders of our country. Although they both lead the country, that's where the similarities end as they had opposing views on everything. Jefferson was a republican while Hamilton was a federalist. Jefferson had been opposed to all of Hamilton's ideas, such as his financial plan, his interpretation of the powers of the government, his foreign policy, and his vision for the future of America. Jefferson was against Hamilton's views because his financial plan would ultimately destroy democracy in America, his interpretation of the powers of
Someone who was polar opposite of Alexander Hamilton in their views was Thomas Jefferson, a member of the Democratic - Republican Party. Jefferson was in favor of a smaller central government with more power to the states. He perceived that it was unconstitutional to have the federal government to have so much influence on daily life. Jefferson thought that agriculture should be the backbone of the economy. He also did not support the idea of a central bank, Jefferson thought that the U.S. should pay off all of its debt and stay out of business affairs.”Those who labor in the earth are the chosen people of god…..for substantial and genuine virtue”(Document D). Thomas thought that America should be the voice of ALL of the people so he wanted the common people to be able to have more of an influence in the government. Jefferson did not trust the wealthy people in government and thought that the more down to earth farmers and commoners would keep them in check. A very prominent difference in Hamilton and Jefferson was their views on the constitution. “Powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution,
Though both Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson served as members of President Washington’s cabinet, the two held very different views on the newly founded U.S. government, interpretation of its constitution, and the role of the “masses” in that government. These conflicting views would develop in two political parties, the Federalists led by Hamilton and the Democratic-Republicans led by Jefferson. Although both political parties presented enticing aspects, Hamilton’s views were much more reasonable and fruitful when compared Jefferson’s views; idealistic and too strict in reference to the constitution.