preview

Compare And Contrast Speech To The Virginia Convention

Decent Essays

In the United States, there was once no peace and freedom, it had to fight for it. In “Speech to the Virginia Convention” Patrick Henry tries to persuade the (colonists) to fight for their freedom. In “President Bush Outlines Iraqi Threat”, President George W. Bush speaks about how we must take down Saddam Hussein to help keep our freedom and peace with the world. Both speeches try to persuade people to fight for what they want. The speeches are rhetorically similar because they both have ethos, pathos, and loaded language. **One way these speeches are rhetorically similar is because they both have ethos. Both speeches use ethos to establish credibility. *In Henry’s speech he uses ethos. In Bush’s speech he uses facts to be credible but also appeals to core values by explaining the consequences of Hussein’s horrible actions. “These actions killed or injured at least 20,000 people, more than six times the number of people who died in the attacks of September the 11th” (Bush). …show more content…

Pathos is the appeals to emotion. In President Bush’s speech he explained how not everyone gets the opportunity to have freedom and peace. “People everywhere prefer freedom to slavery: prosperity to squalor; self-government to the rule of terror and torture. In Henry’s speech, he uses the fear of slavery and submission to persuade the colonist to fight. “There is no retreat but in submission and slavery” (Henry).**Some may say that this is not a form of pathos because it is facts that people do not want slavery, but they do want peace and freedom. Although some may believe this does not have an emotional appeal, it does because it opens up that not everyone gets the opportunity to have freedom and peace, instead they live in a world where the government rules them and peace does not

Get Access