Compare And Contrast The Iraq War A Pointless And Unjust War

Perhaps at very best, war is an unnecessary evil and at worst, an unethical and inhumane practice. When two or more countries cannot agree to settle their differences diplomatically or agree to disagree, the worst comes out in all of them. The Vietnam War was riddled with mistakes, beginning with our involvement in it. The United States was fighting the North Vietnamese Army and armed rebel Vietcong in the South. In hindsight, it was a war of ambushes between the United States military and the elusive Vietcong. Moving into the early 2000’s and Operation Iraqi Freedom, the U.S. was fighting the war on all fronts. Not only were they using bombs and airstrikes and engaging in firefights, they were also being attacked by roadside bombs, vehicle bombs, and suicide bombers. The enemy was everywhere and nowhere at the same time. To make matters worse and intensify the enemy’s resolve, United States military police committed some of the most heinous torture crimes known in modern times. By digitally recording those crimes, the United States military came under intense scrutiny from the very citizens they were vowing to protect and liberate, and the use of makeshift bombs against U.S. troops intensified. To the general public, war seems as easy as identifying the target and neutralizing them, yet as we see through the Vietnam War and Operation Iraqi Freedom, it can be difficult to determine where the enemy is, what methods of warfare they are using, and whether or not we are in fact

Pennsylvania was divided politically in its support of the war. From its inception, individual coalitions of state Democrats presumed that they could end the war by taking control of the branches of state government. The smaller confederacy of these Democrats were the political and social aristocrats of Philadelphia. The larger confederacy was a more conservative. group of Democrats who opposed the war. Many Democrats were concerned by the perceived threats to civil liberties during this time, especially the reversal to review the legality of a person’s arrest or imprisonment.by, the use of military tribunals and the continuing of oppositional newspapers. Outside of constitutional debates, however, this opposition also imitated Pennsylvania’s

The American Civil War was a second American Revolution. Even if the South did not win, the Confederacy was fighting for freedom from the Union. The opposing sides are different from the first American Revolution. The South fought the North instead of America fighting Britain, but both America in the Revolutionary War and the Confederacy in the Civil War fought to have rights and a larger say in government.

Following the attacks in America on September 11, 1999, there was a public outcry for justice throughout the country. Even with significant public support to wage war against Iraq, there was not enough reason to persuade congress. Over the course of two years, President George W. Bush proved that there was a purpose in the war, not only seek vengeance against terrorism; but, gift a people freedom from dictatorship. Yet, there were still downsides to war including inevitable loss of American life and damaged reputation for our country. For that reason, the United States of America should not have gone to war with Iraq in 2003 due to the extensive federal funding for undesirable warfare which took away from domestic prosperity, the preventable injury to veterans as well as violence against civilians, and the country’s damaged reputation achieved due to the illegitimacy of the war.

America is under attack, not from an enemy in a faraway land, but here at home, by our own government. In the current year 2010, almost 7 years after "shock and awe" campaign that officially started the war in Iraq, the U.S. government fails to recognize that our efforts in the Middle East have plateaued, and it is time to bring our troops home. The surge campaigns in recent years were felt by many, to be an unofficial recognition that the war is not going well, and several top generals have had high hopes for this military strategy, but compelling evidence concludes this was a short-lived success. No one can deny the financial toll the Iraq war has had on America, for America is in the middle of one of the worst economic crisis in recent

This essay is in defense of the Iraqi War. President Bush’s vocal critics state that American troops’ have been sacrificed in the Iraq War. First of all, the word “sacrifice” means that a person voluntarily does or gives up something at his or her own free will (like a bunt to advance a runner in baseball or Catholics sacrificing and giving up chocolate for Lent). I don’t believe that any of those soldiers that have been killed in the war deliberately intended to die or were “sacrificed” as Michael Moore has erroneously stated. And I’m sure that if President Bush knew the names of those soldiers that were going to be killed, I’m certain he would have ordered those individuals to stay on U.S.

Some ask the question, was the Vietnam War just? Some may say yes it was just,and others say that it is unjust. However,Certain people view justice as slippery concept. There are always ways to get aroud justice, and that is why people believe that justice is a slippety concept. Even Plato one of the brightest of his time could not figure out whether war was just or unjust. A Certain individual, by the name of Aquinas, also attempted to elaborate his view on the war through the document Summa Theologica. His reasons consisted of, First, the authority of the sovereign by whose command the war is to be waged(Article 1). The second reason being, a just cause is

The 2003 Iraq War lasted less than three weeks. It began in the early morning hours of March 20, when American missiles struck Baghdad. By April 9, U.S. forces had advanced into Baghdad. By April 15 Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein had vanished, and U.S. and allied officials pronounced the end of major combat operations. Although the war itself was short, arguments over whether it was justified had been made for months and years prior to the attack, and still continue today. Going to war in Iraq was not justified on many levels.

Justification of the War in Iraq Despite contrary belief, the Iraq War can certainly be justified. This war began in 2003 with the invasion of Iraq by U.S troops under the command of former president, George W. Bush. This invasion can be vindicated for several reasons. The greatest is that Iraq was a severe menace to its own people due to a corrupt and distorted government, spearheaded by the dictator, Saddam Hussein. Furthermore, Iraq was a substantial threat to other nations in the world, including the United States of America because of its previous possession of weapons of mass destruction and ties with terrorist groups. It would be misleading to not mention the economic gains that motivated the American government to occupy Iraq.

Presidents HW Bush and B Obama were given very different circumstances in their dealings with Iraq and the wars they both were a part of. Because of those different circumstances each handled their particular situation based upon the political climate, each of their administrations/advisors and congress. On August 2, 1990 Iraq invaded their neighboring country Kuwait. The reason for the invasion ranges from Iraq claiming Kuwait was drilling oil under Iraq’s borders to Iraq wanting to steal Kuwaits oil to finance their war with Iran.

War is a scandalous topic where peoples’ views differ as to what war is. Some people see it as pure evil and wicked while others think that it is brave and noble of what soldiers do. Looking at poems which had been written by people affected by war help show the messages which are portrayed. The two sets of poems which show different views of war as well as some similarities are “the Charge of the Light Brigade” by Alfred Lord Tennyson, “To Lucasta, on Going to the Wars” by Richard Lovelace and “Dulce Et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen, “The Song of the Mud” by Mary Borden. Both these poets use linguistic devices to convince the reader of their view of what the war is. Tennyson and Lovelace show how war is worthy

Since the war on Iraq began on March 20, 2003, at least 1,402 coalition troops have died and 9,326 U.S. troops have been wounded in action. This is no small number and the count grows daily. One would hope, then, that these men and women were sent to war with just cause and as a last resort. However, as the cloud of apprehension and rhetoric surrounding the war has begun to settle, it has become clear that the Bush administration relied on deeply flawed analyses to make its case for war to the United Nations and to the American people, rushing this country, and its soldiers, into war. This is not to say that this war was waged against a blameless regime or that our soldiers have died

First of all, war is nothing but bloodthirsty killer. During Iraq War period, 172 U.S. and British combatants were killed fro m March 20 to May 1 and another 222 died between May 2 and October 20. The number of civilians killed during war is between 5,708 and 7,356. The major unknown is the number of Iraqi military deaths during the war and it was estimated as low as 13,500 or as much as 45,000 soldiers. Furthermore, at least 20,000 civilians were injured. If protecting national interests or achieving diplomatic goals is a just cause then which party has a just cause between Iraqi people and U.S. or British army? Basically, all of them have their own just causes arising from their national profits. Then, can you say that soldiers, no matter which party they belong, are guilty because of killing people? The answer is “No,” because, for soldiers, killing enemies is related to more likely legal defense than any other reasons. The point is that all the people, who are related with this cruel action, are nothing but innocent victims.

The Iraq war is necessary because it is helping the world be a better place. By making Iraq less of a threat it allows people to have the peace of mind that they are safe in the world they live in. In an already chaotic world where good is hard to find, we do not need another thing to worry about. We don’t need another thing to worry about. Saddam Hussein made a lot of people worry about things that they should not. He made people in the country he ruled feel unsafe. When you make people feel unsafe in their own country that is when you have a problem. The Iraqi war is necessary because Saddam Hussein has been attempting weapons of mass destruction, It is necessary against the war on terrorism, Hussein committed crimes against humanity.

Slide: After the Panic of 1873, JP Morgan became one of the most powerful men in the world.