Compare Ethic's And Jim Crow: The Ethics Of In Crow

The Jim Crow laws were state and local laws enacted that mandated racial segregation in all public facilities in southern states of the former confederacy. The blacks were said to be “separate but equal” and this separation led to conditions for the blacks that tended to be inferior to those provided for whites. Law-enforced segregation mainly applied to the southern United States whereas northern segregation had patterns of segregation in housing that was enforced by the covenants, bank lending practices, and job discrimination. For decades, this included discriminatory union practices for decades. The Jim Crow laws segregated public schools, public places, public transportation, restrooms, restaurants, and drinking fountains. Therefore, it did nothing to bring about social or economic equality.

The Jim Crow laws were everything but fair, and equal. Jim Crow is the name they used in the laws on separating the African Americans from the Caucasian men and women. These laws deprived African Americans from their civil rights because of the many things they were not allowed to experience due to these laws. Jim Crow laws oppressed the educational rights, voting rights, and social freedoms of American citizens, this essay will be discussing the oppression of these rights and freedoms.

“Jim Crow Laws were statutes and ordinances established between 1874 and 1975 to separate the white and black races in the American South. In theory, it was to create "separate but equal" treatment, but in practice Jim Crow Laws condemned black citizens to inferior treatment and facilities.” The Jim Crows Laws created tensions and disrespect towards blacks from whites. These laws separated blacks and whites from each other and shows how race determines how an individual is treated. The Jim Crow laws are laws that are targeted towards black people. These laws determine how an individual is treated by limiting their education, having specific places where blacks and whites could or could not go, and the punishments for the “crime”

According to the thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth amendments, blacks had the same legal protection as whites. The Supreme Court contradicted this when they allowed so called “restrictions” in the South against blacks. Those who supported Jim Crow generally lived in the South. They believed that whites were above the blacks, in things ranging from intelligence to morality. They thought sexual relations between the two races would ruin the nation, and violence could be used on blacks if needed. So, hospitals, beaches, parks, prisons, public restrooms and even water fountains were separated by color of skin. In certain areas, there weren’t even facilities for colored people (Pilgrim). African Americans also had to treat whites with respect, whereas whites did not have to, and most of the time would not treat the blacks the same. Blacks had to use titles when speaking to whites, they could not eat with the whites, and black men could not offer to shake a white mans hand. Preachers did not help with the problem, but in some situations made it worse. They would preach that God supported segregation, “the whites were the chosen people, and Blacks were servants” (Pilgrim).

Michelle Alexander’s The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness goes into great detail on race related issues that were specific to black males, the mass incarceration, and how that lead to the development of institutionalized racism in the United States. She compares the Jim Crow with recent phenomenon of mass incarceration and points out that the mass incarceration is a network of laws, policies, customs and institutions that have been working together to warrant the subordinating status of black males. In this paper I will go into a brief examination of the range of issues that she mentions in her book that are surrounding the mass incarceration of black male populations.

The Jim Crow Laws were a set of laws established by southern states to successfully to eliminate African Americans from the American political and legal system--a de jure form of discrimination. These southern states (consisting of Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia and Kentucky) ensured white supremacy over African Americans by establishing laws that included no interracial marriages, segregation in schools, healthcare, public facilities, housing, entertainment, prison, free speech and libraries. In Mississippi, marriage of a white person with a "Negro" or "mulatto" or person having one-eighth or more "Negro" blood was void. New Mexico said that books shouldn't be shared by white and "Negro" children and that if "colored people" were to go to the library to read then the librarian need to set up a confined space for them. A white child being in custody of a black person was "unlawful" in South Carolina. 3

The primary economic problems that plagued the Post Bellum South include: First, cotton, which was the main crop, fell in demand. In turn, the price of the cotton decreased dramatically. Secondly, the labor system fell as there was no more slavery. Thirdly, there was a shortage of credit because of the impacts of the war and rural banks were few as well. This was hard especially on the freed men who had few resources and could only afford to do their purchases on credit. Additionally, merchants started charging 25 to 75 percent interest rate, normally depending on the race, on goods bought on credit and asked for a lien on cotton.

Jim crow law was mostly a racism segregation law. That separated millions of colored families and

Jim Crow laws were laws that segregated whites and colored people. The Jim Crow laws mostly benefited the whites. The Jim Crow laws made it to where the blacks had to use separate water fountains, schools busses, bathrooms and waiting rooms. The Jim Crow laws benefited the whites in most ways and dishonored the colored. The Jim Crow laws were in effect from 1870 to 1965.

Jim Crow laws were laws created by local and state governments that fueled racial segregation and maintained the “separate but equal” doctrine, which was defined by the formation of public spaces that were segregated but “equal”. This, of course, led to lower standards of living for African-Americans in the United States. One of the most important rights taken from African-Americans at this time was the right to vote. Unlike Caucasian voters, African-Americans were often given “literacy tests” or asked to do hard tasks, these were done with the goal to effectively stop them from voting. Many protests were held to protest this, eventually leading to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This act expanded upon the rights for minorities by outlawing segregation of many things. “To enforce the constitutional right to vote, to confer jurisdiction upon the district courts of the United States to provide injunctive relief against discrimination in public accommodations, to authorize the Attorney General to institute suits to protect constitutional rights in public facilities and public education, to extend the Commission on Civil Rights, to prevent discrimination in federally assisted programs, to establish a Commission on Equal Employment Opportunity, and for other purposes.” This act was a monumental step closer to equality in America for

Many are unaware of the effects that race has played in their lives over the years. Some may not understand its implications, but are very oblivious to it. Race can influence such things like attitude and behavior. Nowadays being white or black means something more than just a Crayola color. No longer are they just colors, they are races with their own rules and regulations. People of color have been inferior to the white race for centuries. In their own way Zora Neale Hurston shows this concept in her story “How it feels to be Colored Me” as does Richard Wright in his autobiographical sketch “The Ethics of Living Jim Crow”.

The was once a time where blacks and whites could work with each other side by side. In these times it was after slavery but freed slaves knew their place. I would say it was a wonderful time people just knew how to respect everyone. However, one day in the Plessy vs Ferguson trail a black man was in the white area of the train. With that, therefore the Jim Crow laws develop. Jim crow laws were enforced racial segregation no in the United States. this meaning that always white and blacks had to be separated on buses, restaurants, movies, etc.

Throughout “The Ethics of Living Jim Crow,” Richard Wright explores the “lessons” that black Americans had to learn in order to survive in a violently racist society. The short story includes nine experiences that the author; Richard Wright, has learned or survived through. One of the first “lessons” learned is from the white boys who lived on the other side of the tracks. While retreating from what seemed like a “war”, according to Wright, in which case, was a fictional fight (play fight).

Child Psychology is a branch of Psychology that focuses on the study of the mental and social developments of children. In the book “Uncle Tom’s Children” by Richard wright, two of the stories clearly display this. As the events of the stories unfold, we are able to see how the main characters’ personalities and mental states change, which involves beliefs, attitude, actions, change of heart, etc. The topic of “Child Psychology” is shown in the stories “The Ethics of Living Jim Crow” and “Big Boy Leaves Home”, through how the personalities of the main characters change due to the experiences they go through and the situations that they are exposed to.

Race and Oppression have been a really interesting topic in this course, this topic has been represent the most significantly through the two texts The Ethics of living Jim Crow by Richard Wright and Toba Tek Singh by Sadat Hasan Manto. Both talked about how a power group used oppression to keep the other down through essentialism, prescription for their civilizing mission and how it effects the oppressed group.