When comparing The Conditions of the Working Class in England and The Environmental Conditions of the Working Class these both talk about how difficult it was to live there and the different opinions between Engel’s and Clark. After reading through Clark’s environmental conditions these defiantly don’t compare to what we live in today. Starting off with something that people in America don’t face is “The condition of human and environmental degradation extended form the factory to the home. In factories, workers labored in poisoned environment and in ways that cause innumerable health problems.” This is not a problem for us today because we have a lot of technology/ uniforms that protect us from being poisoned. The one thing I did find interesting about this article is that Clark states that “conditions of the working class was that those in power, who profited off of the misery and suffering of workers and who know that these conditions were the consequence of such a social system, were collectively guilty of murder.” In the passage of the that Engels has written it touches on the three negatives during this time period. One being the slums and how terrible they are, number two how the upper-class won’t help the lower class out and act like they don’t exists and the last one is how no one can get along and help each other out. In today’s society, I feel as though we don’t have anything nearly as bad as what they had back in that time period here in America. I do think that
Economic Pressure was used in the speech regularly to show the large division between the rich and the poor. The speaker refers to ‘the rich unnaturally elevated’, ‘weight of taxation, misrule and oppression’. ‘Destitution in horrid form stalks through street, lane and thourghfare’ ‘emaciated frames’. The terminology reflects on the economic pressures that the poor endured, high tax and poor working conditions that often led to illness and death. He emphasised how the richer of the society, the aristocracy, were ‘in exclusive possession of power’. This speech would have stirred the emotions of the crowds as they heard how hard their lives were to those belonging to the upper classes. The speaker creates horrid, desperate images of the poorer classes ‘insufferable despair,’ toll of the death-bell’ to highlight how hard their lives were. (Briggs, 1959, P.50) a secondary source reflected how Chartism ‘seems to have been strongest in the two kinds of places… centres of decaying or contracting industry’ and ‘new or expanding single industry towns’. Briggs ‘s writing shows that Chartism was prominent in only certain areas such as those of industry. Whereas, ‘almost non-existent in completely agricultural villages’.
Harrington describes the many factors contributed to about 20-25% of the nation facing poverty in America in the 1960s. The loss of mining jobs caused most of the inhabitants of the small towns in the picturesque Appalachian Mountains to lose their livelihood and become poor. The inner city slums in cities like Chicago and New York were (still are) home to many African Americans, minorities, and poor whites that left their hometowns seeking jobs. These areas were high crime prone areas with rodent infested dilapidated buildings, poor sanitary conditions, inferior quality schools, and dismal healthcare (poor people got sick more often compared to middle class). The poor were thought of as “underclass” by the Middle Class America
Another negative effect of the Industrial Revolution was the poor sanitary conditions in cities. When Friedrich Engels visited an English industrial city he stated in “The Conditions of the Working Class in England” that the streets are usually unpaved, full of holes, filthy and strewn with refuse due to the lack of gutters or drains. This caused the main river of Manchester to look coal black and be packed with stinking filth. The factories also led to pollution and poor air quality due to the open air vents and chimneys which released the pollution from the factory into the air. Many people who lived in these poor cities or slums were either the working class or the poor that had to struggle through these unsanitary conditions.
Secondly, as the Industrial Revolution progressed the environmental conditions were degrading with it, and becoming more and more unsanitary. The Industrial Revolution caused factories to be built and those factories had no regulations on how to maintain the environment clean. Engels says, referring to those factories that, “All the filth, both liquid and solid discharged by these works finds its way into the River Irk.” Then Engels describe the river as a “narrow, coal-black, stinking river full of filth and rubbish.” The rivers were being contaminated by the byproduct created by many factories that were brought alongside with the Industrial Revolution. The factories also polluted the air and land with contaminants as explained by Engels
The reading and video reveal that living conditions during the Gilded Age were terrible, unsafe drinking water, unwanted sewage disposal, animal waste, and air conditions were ineffective. Many people don’t have a place to live in the house so they gathered and lived in Tenements where they have no enough space for more people and is more contaminated. In tenements, kids had to live in crowded and unsafe areas. There was high death rate and high sickness rate because of diseases. Almost 8000 people died because of disease. So, the life condition was bad at that time. Similarly, the working conditions during the Gilded Age was also not better. Not only adults
Another great issue introduced by the growth in Manchester was the poor living and working conditions of the lower class. Homes had no furniture or food and the people lacked clothes (Doc.7). Additionally, the work hours were long and the factories were uncomfortable and hazardous. A chart states that the average age at death for workers in Manchester is lower than any that of any other district (Doc.8). At last, Document 5 quotes that “…here civilization works its miracles, and the civilized man is turned back into a savage”.
The spread of industrialization rapidly altered and changed the city of Manchester during the nineteenth century. Of course there were positive effects that stemmed from this, but negative effects due to the growth of industrialization outnumbered the positive outcomes and are often overshadowed. The environmental hazards and the working conditions of the factory were enough to harm laborers and the gentry (documents 1, 2, 6, 7, 8 and 11), dulling the positive
Document 3 is an article written by Thomas B. Macaulay and a response to Robert Southey as is seen in Document 2. He argues that the expansion of the manufacturing system had led to a greater life expectancy because of the increase in food production, homes, clothing, as well as improved medical intravenous. However, since Macaulay was an active member of the Liberal Parliament, it was expected for him to have these types of views, due to the fact that the liberal party promotes change. As in Document 5 Alexis de Tocqueville, a French visitor to Manchester in 1835 states that from the sewers, although they may be filthy, "pure gold flows." Industrialization from Tocqueville point of view seems filthy. But, only if you see industrialization from his aspect Tocqueville is from a pre-revolutionary France, meaning that he had yet to discover the true astonishments of industrialization. In Document 9, Wheelan and Co. State that Manchester is by far the most attractive city in all of England, and its magnificence cannot be seen except when you're physically present. Compared to the first lines in Document 7, it collaborates on the improvements within the city. Nonetheless, since Wheelan and Co. Is a business, they are based on trying to gain the appeal to others within their reach. With William Alexander Abram, a journalist and a historian, published an article in 1868 with an explanation on how the factory laborers environment had improved to a great extent throughout the past quarter of a century (Document 10). Abram fights with the data of Document 8, arguing about how circumstances have changed to better the population's overall
The society is in such a way that it falls into categories of people who belong to different social classes and this creates a difference in the way individuals lead their lifestyle, and in the way individuals interact with each other. The working poor refer to a social group which develops as a result of the social inequalities which exist in the society. The population comprises of individuals who put a lot of effort in their activities but still fail to witness growth and development in their socio-economic being. It is normally wrong to categorize such persons as being lazy, and instead, one may argue that nature dictates the fate of these beings.
Textile factories were not safe for working class families for the reason that the people were injured and unhealthy. A few people entered into the textile factories unhealthy which could´ve made their health issues worse. The interviewee , Dr. Holme says that the people employed were in great health. He also said that the children he had seen were all in health and that the hours they worked were not injurious to their health. John Birley says that they had good food and good beds. He also says that they were treated kindly. Dr . Holme says that Mr. Pooley employed 401 people and 363 people were in good health. Dr. Holme also said that the factories were as healthy as any other part of the working classes of the community. His conclusion was
In spite of the fact that industrialization in the United States raised ways of life for some, it had a dull side. Corporate managers, in some cases alluded to as "burglar aristocrats," sought after exploitative and out of line business rehearses gone for taking out rivalry and expanding benefits. Assembly line laborers, large portions of them late migrants, were much of the time subjected to severe and hazardous working and living conditions. Political debasement enhanced legislators to the detriment of the lower and regular workers, who attempted to make a decent living. The crevice between "those who are well off" and "the poor" was augmenting.
The Industrial revolution started in Britain around 1750 and by 1850 it will make Great Britain the wealthiest country in the world. The revolution also spread to other European countries and the New World. Both Germany and United States will surpass Britain in the next fifty years. What was the effect of The Industrial Revolution on the working class?
The book is far from a complete history and instead focuses on one specific sector of British history, the plight of the poor in early 20th century Manchester. Three main points seems to fight their way to the forefront, as they drive the direction and tone of the book. The first main point stressed is the elaborate and complex social stratification. Roberts says on the first page, "I grew up in what was perhaps an ideal
Throughout Cultural Perspectives, many influential texts have been read, analyzed, and discussed. One text, Life in the Iron Mills by Rebecca Harding Davis, integrates the thoughts of quite a few authors that have been discussed this semester. Through employing a Marxist view of history—there are always the “haves” and the “have-nots”—one can see that Life in the Iron Mills exemplifies the struggles that face many “have-not” citizens throughout history. One can then see the clear connections to various authors such as Mary Wollstonecraft, W.E.B. DuBois, Karl Marx and Freidrich Engels, and Adam Smith.
Life can at times seem bad, even in the lives of some of the most prestigious, rich, popular people in the world. Bad hair, lack of sleep, abundance of homework, and an absence of money have the tendency to put a damper on some people's days, among other things. Too many times, though, in today's society things are taken for granted. Imagine not having a place to sleep, having no means of education, or having all hard-earned funds taken by the government, not even leaving enough to feed the family. This is how it was for Englanders in the 1800s. The condition of the working-class in 19thcentury England was, without a doubt, disgusting and miserable. The circumstances were spiraling out of control and the working class was