preview

Comparing Baz Lurhman's Romeo And Juliet

Decent Essays

Of all of Shakespeare’s plays his most famous play is Romeo and Juliet, the tale of two star-cross’d lovers. Since 1597 there have been numerous reproductions of this play, whether they be acted out on a stage or displayed on the big screen. As usual when making books into movies, there are or can be changes with the plot, characters, setting, language, the list goes on. You name it, it can be changed. Something that is quite intriguing in the movie adaptations and play, however, is the representation of Romeo and Juliet’s faith. In the 1996 interpretation of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, Baz Lurhman uses images of the virgin Mary, crucifixes, and other Catholic relics to reinforce Romeo and Juliet’s actions and choices. To begin with, …show more content…

In the 16th century this was a cultural norm since people only lived to be in their 40’s. People got married in their teenage years and most of Europe was catholic, so premarital sex was extremely frowned upon by all. In Romeo and Juliet, the two characters are quick to to get married and their motive for marriage is somewhat unconventional. They only want to get married because they find each other physically attractive and want to engage in coitus. But for Romeo and Juliet in the play, getting married at this time and age was perfectly fine. Though in the movie the level of religiousness had to be raised to compensate for the change in setting. As time progressed from the day and age the play was written, the practice of no sex before marriage wasn't followed as much, especially by teens. So the exaggeration of religious representation in the movie was a plot tool to used by the Director to make sense of why Romeo and Juliet are doing all this stupid shit. Overall/ anyway, romeo and juliet wouldn’t have turned out the way it did, had they not been super religious and faith oriented. Had they been less religious or in modern times they would've just hit it and quit it. Audi

Get Access