Evidence-based practices (EBP) and empirically supported treatments (EST) are different approaches used in the field of psychology for psychotherapeutic treatment. ESP’s are current interventions based on scientific evidence; this suggests the strongest contributions and risk factors to psychological symptoms. According to Dr. Norcross, evidence-based practice is based on empirical research and the main goal is for the effectiveness in treating patients; it makes clinicians more effective, allows them to meet patients. EBP helps in making better decisions for patient care and treatment, which can better support the client's care process. EBP psychology has expanded the treatment of the patient to include patient characteristics, culture,
Gerrish, K. Lathlean, J. (2015). The research process in nursing. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons. p263.
In this essay, I am going to consider how evidence-based practice can be used to support, justify, legitimate and/or improve clinical practice. I am also going to explore and discuss primary and secondary research evidences about how nursing interventions can potentially improve the quality of life of patients in the community suffering from heart failure. I will gather these evidences using a literature search which I will include an account of. Using a critiquing framework for support, I will appraise both primary and secondary evidences that I have chosen. I will also look at potential non-evidential factors that can influence evidence utilisation in practice. Finally, a conclusion will be drawn.
In today 's society, there is a great deal of research and practice about evidence based practice. Most of this is highly sought upon in the field of psychology, where evidence and decision making is key to accomplishing new ideas of treatments for people who retain psychiatric problems. The meaning of evidence-based practice in psychology is that it involves making very educated and supported decisions based on punctilious, unambiguous, and astute evidence (Rousseau & Gunia, 2016). With evidence-based practice, it assists in raising and deriving the issue of what evidence really is, the strength of the evidence, and how practitioners can improve the quality of their evidence (Rousseau & Gunia, 2016). Evidence is a major factor because it may either enhance or hinder the practitioner 's ability to make decisions and construct their practices on patients (Rousseau & Gunia, 2016). Evidence-based practice began in the 1980 's with the goal to combine the practices of scientific evidence with physician education and clinical practice. The issue with this was that medical schools did not have the ability to teach their own specific approaches to clinical problems (Rousseau & Gunia, 2016). As an effect to this cause, three main issues quickly arose about the effectiveness and quality of evidence-based practice. First, since other fields were advancing growth in
Evidence-based practices have been gaining a lot importance recently and it was so interesting to search the online libraries to actually see how many exist. It was stimulating to go onto the National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices websites and be in awe of abundance of programs. There were programs for almost every type of social work practice. While looking through the different databases in regards to evidence-based practice (EBP), one in particular really caught my attention. The particular EBP that will be discussed is known as Cognitive Processing Therapy for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). I chose this specific one because I have a great interest in therapies with those suffering from PTSD.
Using the knowledge of EBP I am able to review current research on practice issues or problems in my organization by evaluating the problem or issue and determining the PICO components to establish the EBP question. This information can help provide some of the search terms used to gather the information. I would evaluate the relevance and believability of the data by assessing the strength and quality of the data. This is achieved by looking at evidence provided in the last five years to assure the research is current. High quality evidence can often be found in well-known professional journals or on government agency websites. The type of evidence is defined as research (level 1-3) or non-research (level 4-5). For example, level one research is a randomized control trial. To measure quality you would look at the sample size and the adequacy of control used for the study and if it was a larger study this would be a higher quality. The strength and the quality as noted in these features help to define the relevance and believability and thus the ability to draw conclusions form the evidence.
The incorporation of evidenced-based practice (EBP) into nursing practice is supported by research to positively improve the quality of care and improve patient outcomes. EBP is important to the nursing profession because it also leads to increased job satisfaction, teamwork, and levels of engagement in clinicians (Melnyk, et al., 2017). Miniature research projects such as quality improvement projects, surveys, and clinical research studies are frameworks used to get feedback and data from patients during their time spent in health care systems. EBP is not the standard of care in many health care systems (Melnyk, et al., 2017). This due to many factors, including lack of EBP mentors, nursing programs that do not incorporate EBP into the curriculum,
Venous thromboembolism refers to the formation of a blood clot in a blood vessel. While clots can form in an artery or a vein, this article focuses only on clots that occur in a vein ("," 2015). Critically ill patients are at an increased risk of a venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to VTE can manifest as a deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or a pulmonary embolism (PE). Risk factors include venous stasis, vascular injury, and hypercoagulable disorders. A majority of ICU patients carry at least one risk factor for VTE; additional risk factors are considered to have a cumulative effect…it is impossible to predict which patients will experience a
Research has shown that children, who have a strong foundation, are ready to succeed in school. During the 1960’s, there was an increase of awareness of developmental psychology therefore, scientists were beginning to understand that early childhood education would increase cognitive development. The idea of a show like Sesame Street was introduced.
The impact of evidence based practice has been brought into nursing through education, practice, and science over the last decade. Evidence based practice provides quality care to patients that is effective, safe, and efficient. Evidence based practice promises moving care to a high level of producing the intended health outcome for the patients. “EBP is aimed at hardwiring current knowledge into common care decisions to improve care processes and patient outcomes” (Stevens, 2013). EBP empowers nurses and expands their skills by using the best available evidence to guide nursing care and patient outcomes.
Today, we are continually striving to improve the quality of care that we deliver and the best method in applying relevant research into clinical practice are through evidence based practice (EBP). We have now come to a time in our careers to shift our direction on how to employ evidence based practice techniques when managing our patient's health care needs. Facilitation is a method that has been investigated as a way to help clinicians accomplish the implementation of evidence into practice. As clinicians, we are encouraged to think outside the box and utilize critical thinking skills as well as express our role as nurses as part of the health care team.
Jeremy, nice posting about continuing to advance evidence-based practice (EBP). Stevens (2013) wrote that clinical leaders have the chance to advance ahead and change healthcare from a systems view, thus directing their efforts on evidence-based practice (EBP) for proven effectiveness, patient commitment, and patient safety. I see that through this program that this is only the beginning, I have the sturdy foundation from which I can build from the bottom up. Now that my eyes are open more and I challenge the organization or leaders more with the data to support my claims, I am now the squeaky wheel that grates on your nerves.
Applying evidenced-based practice has three steps. Step one is making sure the research is creditable. Going into detail about step one should model a social work practice. In a social work practice, you always want to make sure you are looking for clarity and in some cases it helps to paraphrase it or reword it differently. As a social worker you have to be non-judgmental and try to understand every perspective. You have to be unbiased when it comes to wording and how it affects the meaning of the conversation. Also, making sure the research on the surveys or interviews are fair and represent the entire population. The second step is when you match your outcome of the research in your own “practice wisdom." As a social worker you want to compare the research you made with prior experience. You want to have different perspective and information that help you understand the client better. Lastly, the last step is to ask questions to the clients about their significance of what they have accomplished by working with you. Just asking what the client has learned can help
The use of Evidenced-Based Practice (EBP) is required by universities throughout Undergraduate programs in Communication Science-Disorders, Graduate programs in Masters of Arts or Science in Speech-Language Pathology, and during Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) programs in Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences. The implementation of EBP in all my assignments significantly increased during my first semester in the Masters of Arts program for Speech-Language Pathology at Lehman College. During the use of EBP for assignments, I have relayed on my clinical judgment to question: the methodologies, how and why certain groups were selected, the author/s’ purpose for writing the article, the most valuable piece of information, the inferences and conclusions, and how it will impact the field of speech-language pathology. I also used evidence-based research while writing reports and justifications for therapy techniques and goals; during the search for articles I had to consider how it would impact the client and his/her family, as well as the meaning it would add to the therapy session. Moreover, I encountered acronyms and new vocabulary that are currently being used in the field such as MGRs- Mental Graphemic Representations, and tDCS- transcranial Direct Current
I believe that the art of psychotherapy is more important than empirically validated treatments (EVT). I feel that the art of psychotherapy lies in the common factors, which include the therapeutic relationship, client and therapist factors (e.g., personality), helping clients deal with problems, and hope or expectancy factors (Reisner, 2005). Although I do believe that empirically validated treatments may enhance the therapeutic process, the treatments themselves are by no means the most important or fundamental aspects of therapy. There appears, at least to me, to be much more of an art involved in developing the relationship with the client and understanding the client’s perspective. It takes art and skill of a therapist to examine,
Evidence-based practice (EBP) offers a framework utilization of systematic high-quality research, an analysis which consistently enhances measurable client outcome and clinical decision-making grounded in rationality; EBP depends on data collected through experimental research and accounts for individual client characteristics and clinician expertise. The potential benefits of EBP comprise of increased service delivery and quality of care, heightened accountability, and a bridging of the research-practice gap (Sackett, Straus, Richardson, Rosenberg, & Haynes, 2000). It is imperative that research scholars are cognizant of research outcome dependability and validity prior to implementing results