preview

Comparing Hamlet And Eastern Promises

Decent Essays

It has been said in an old French proverbial which dates back to the 1700s that, “revenge is a dish best served cold.” While the saying is one that speaks to the satisfaction that revenge can provide the individual when enacted meticulously, and in great violence, the opposite is more often the case. Rather than providing satisfaction and wholeness, retribution is a device that can serve to sever the individual from their sense of principles, so as to result in a harmful reconfiguration of identity. In both William Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, and director David Cronenberg’s film, Eastern Promises (2007), the creators explore how the individual, in heroic attempts to achieve justice and vengeance for past atrocities, is instead paradoxically …show more content…

Both works examine this through the use of dark transitional shifts in character persona, the recurring pattern of action of the destruction from within, as illustrated through rot and parasite imagery, and the recurring pattern of action of dehumanization as expressed through images of prostitution, along with the devastation of the innocent. Similarly, these ideas are further expressed in director Denis Villeneuve’s film, Incendies (2010) which demonstrates how the exploration of a repressed traumatic past can lead to the liberation of a painful truth, and how the perception of the self falls to catastrophe by the corruptive power of the …show more content…

In Hamlet, the Prince attempts to avenge his father, Old Hamlet, whose death is exposed as a murder for power and status by Hamlet’s uncle Claudius. The nature of this murder as “unnatural” is revealed through a conversation between Hamlet and the ghost of his father in unremoved ground (1.5.25): “Tis given out that, sleeping in mine orchard,/A serpent stung me; […] The serpent that did sting thy father’s life/ Now wears his crown” (1.5.35-36/39-40). As a result of this conversation, Hamlet makes the decision to murder Claudius in order to avenge his father and free him from the purgatory his murder has trapped him in (1.5.14). To enact this revenge, the Prince undergoes a transitional shift in character and takes on a persona of madness: “As I perchance hereafter shall think meet/ To put an antic disposition on,” (1.5. 173-174). While Hamlet originally adopts this “antic disposition” to deflect those around him so that he is able to have freedom to plot his vengeance, the identity shift instead results in a damage to Hamlet’s mental state and temperament. Hamlet’s transmutation to madness does not protect him and his motives as intended, but rather, contributes to his own death at the end of the play (5.2.351). This damage to Hamlet’s self, and his change in disposition, is revealed through the play’s

Get Access