preview

Comparing John Boyne's 'The Boy In Striped Pajamas'

Good Essays

As most of you know, most books nowadays are made into movies. Some popular ones include The Hunger Games, Harry Potter, The Fault in our Stars and the one we have been studying in class, The Boy in Striped Pajamas. In 2006 John Boyne published the book highlighting the Holocaust through a child’s view. Two years later, BBC Films and Hayday Films released the movie, directed by Mark Herman, which attracted million of viewers. The film stayed loyal to the text however, had some distinct differences. One of the major differences was the change in perspective. In the book, the story was told through a nine-year-old’s perspective, which allowed the reader to be led through the horrible events without having any prior knowledge. However, in the film the story was told …show more content…

Though Shmuel is relatively similar to Bruno, he is imprisoned while Bruno is not, simply because he is a jew. Boyne sets the moral of the story from the similarities that they share, even though they are separated by class, race, and religion, but as human, they are equal (2.06). Further, onto the film, we discover that Bruno does not complain about his lack of friends, and how he envies Shmuel for having children to play with on his side of the fence. The direct quote from the book says, “Its so unfair… I don’t see why I have to be on this side of the fence where there is no on to talk to and no one to play with and you get to have dozens of friends and are probably playing for hours everyday. I’ll speak to Father about it.” Shmuel does not correct Bruno, but of course, they are not playing on the other side of the fence. Boyne uses irony in Bruno’s solution, Father who is supposed to be the problem solver in this situation is, in fact, the perpetrator of the genocide which took place in the Out-With. Through this dialogue, Boyne ensured us that Shmuel is more grown-up than

Get Access