The Plight of Man
Fear is a clever, sinister adversary, displaying no grace, no mercy, no humanity in the grisly war for life. This omniscient foe battles for dominance within each person and society, as exhibited in The Lord of the Flies by William Golding and A Sufi Tale. While Golding’s novel is set in an idyllic, blooming island paradise and the Persian teaching story occurs in a small, primitive village, fear is nondiscriminatory, looming as a major conflict that strikes humanity’s core in both works. As a result, combating fear is the plight of man; yet, it is man’s own tactics that determines fate. So, as epitomized in these two pieces above, the human condition is an inescapable fact, where civilization may fall to the ruins of chaos
…show more content…
The second visiter in A Sufi Tale embodies those three ideals, using caution and care when interacting with the villagers. Initially, the man gently knocks, asking first for permission, then opens the door to gain the tribe’s trust, even tiptoeing as he approaches with caution and care. Then he asks the people to step closer as he inspects the strange object, using knowledgeable thought to contribute to a fuller conclusion. The man, aware of its benignity, generously shares a piece of the watermelon, teaching the masses of its true nature. Through the fruit’s seeds, the visiter also provides hope and stability by guiding the villagers to grow the watermelons themselves. Rather than using death and fear as a motivator, the focus is on creating new things and cultivating life. Meanwhile in Lord of the Flies, the three characters, Ralph, Piggy and Simon, provide similar reasonings when dealing with the unknown, using sagacity and civilized thought to fuel their decisions. Piggy, for instance, is the erudite symbol of society, declaring that “life is scientific ” and as a result, “ isn’t no beast.” He is an eminent intellectual whose way of life is shaped by the values of their past world. So up till his death, he fights for the remains of civilization, wrangling with the “savages” if it is better to “to have rules and agree, or to hunt and kill.” However, only Ralph applies Piggy’s “brains”, being able …show more content…
The two works, A Sufi Tale and Lord of the Flies embodies how fear affects the mind, able to corrupt or inspire. The Persian teaching tale depicted how the unknown drives panic to inhabit one’s life. However, instead of barbarously assailing the watermelon like the strongman, knowledge and care are the main assets in warding away fear. In relation with Golding’s works, while Jack merely manipulated the island’s terror to gain power, Ralph, Simon and Piggy’s civilized mannerisms aid in conveying the beast’s true nature, dwelling within mankind. Sometimes, while the world is teeming with treachery, the worst is our own
Throughout the novel Lord Of The Flies, the boys on the island are continuously faced with numerous fears. Subsequently there is nothing on the island which they fear more than the beast. The beast is not a tangible object that can be killed or destroyed by conventional means, but an idea symbolizing the primal savage instincts within all people. Its Golding’s intention to illustrate the innate evil inside man through his view of human nature, the actions of the Jack and his tribe, and the relationship between the beast and the school boys.
William Goldning’s Lord of the Flies is an allegorical novel where literary techniques are utilized to convey the main ideas and themes of the novel. Two important central themes of the novel includes loss of civilization and innocense which tie into the concept of innate human evil. Loss of civilization is simply the transition from civilization to savagery; order to chaos. The concept of loss of innocense is a key concept to innate human evil because childhood innocense is disrupted as the group hunted animals and even their own. Through the use of literary techniques these ideas are seen in the passage where Simon confronts the “Lord of the Flies.”
The Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, is an allegory that connects the boys’ behavior in the novel to the basic behavior of human nature. In the novel, the boys fear a wild beast that has the potential to kill them off. However, Simon, a quiet boy, finds that the beast is not an animal that everyone should fear, but is a part of each boy himself.
Human’s innate behavior after the constraints and expectations of society disappear is the recurring theme centering the characters. William Golding’s Lord of the Flies uses the righteous Simon to highlight Jack and his evil role throughout the novel of savagery and civilization. The foil characters in Lord of the Flies exhibit the contrasting ideals and characteristics, the dissimilar symbolism of both characters, and the circumstances which lead both characters to follow one’s natural tendencies. To emphasize the message of Lord of the Flies, two young innocent boys will gradually begin to show their individualism.
William Golding’s Lord of the Flies presents a story of a group of boys who become stranded on an island together, and in their struggle to survive; some begin to fight for power. Having power makes them feel in control of their situation; however, this power struggle quickly begins to consume them. Golding uses the power struggle between Ralph and Jack, the two main characters, to illustrate the power struggle between good and evil.
Lord of the Flies is often claimed to be an allegory of modern society. While this is true, Golding’s intentions in writing this novel are much deeper. William Golding’s Lord of the Flies provides an enlightening insight into the true nature of human beings; along with why people refrain from acting upon the evil that resides within them. He presents these ideas through symbolism within the novel and it proves effective in many ways. Through symbolism, Golding can unfold the excellent plot of his novel, while subsequently sharing his ideas on the relationship of mankind and society. Golding uses the beast, the conch shell, and Piggy’s glasses to symbolize the human impulse towards ‘savagery’ and the social constructs put in place to prevent it.
In our society, people are often cruel to one another in the want for personal gain, but this is restrained to mere social interactions and online in our industrial world. However, when we are separated from civilized society and the pressures that it places upon us, we are quick to turn to savage, cruel behavior to survive. Golding understood this idea, that we are only civilized when others are watching, and showed the possibility for even the purest to become affected by societal pressures in his novel, the Lord of the Flies. In order to show the role of cruelty in shaping the novel Lord of the Flies, Golding uses character archetypes, the idea of cosmic irony, and extended symbolism to highlight the inherent flaws of human nature and the potential for even the purest individuals to turn to cruel ways due to societal pressures.
Sometimes fear can be shown through external things, or sometimes, fear can lie internally. The Lord of the Flies was a twisted situation that shows what can happen to a group of unattended boys that are left to fend for themselves on a stranded island. They begin to develop a fear of the “beast”, which is what they think is the monster of the island. From an outsiders perspective, “the beast” could be perceived as the fear of an actual “monster-like” beast, the hypocrisy of war, or the evil that lies within us.
Lord of the Flies is a marvelous non-fiction paradigm of the contrast of civility and savagery in human nature. In the novel, the author, William Golding, masterfully tells of how one characteristic taints the other, and eventually takes possession of its host. Throughout the novel, multiple results of these two attributes, along with many other situations, are portrayed using objects and characters, conveying the overall message
The great terrors of the world, they bring out the cruelest of people. Even in children there is the cruelness inside that can escape with the help of terror. In the book, Lord of the flies by William Golding, a group of young boys get stranded on an uninhabited island in the Pacific Ocean and have to deal with the consequences letting fear in. Golding uses diction, symbolism, and tone to show how the boys brought out the terrors on the island out of fear.
Lord of the Flies by William Golding is a book set during World War 2 about a group of young boys having to fend for themselves on an island with no signs of civilization. Within the novel, there are many different themes, most conveying the ingrained evil within all human beings and the malevolent complexions of humanity. As the story advances, Golding manifests the continuous conversion of the boys from being civilized and methodical people to ferocious savages. The book can be expounded in terms of political and social allegory. Golding covers a myriad of details that evince two contrasting political factions. By analyzing the allegory of Jack and the beast it is
Throughout William Golding’s book, Lord of the Flies, there lies an interesting battle between being civilized and adhering to one’s primal instincts. This is clearly illustrated through two distinct characters: Ralph and Jack. While the two of them clash, they are still strangely able to get along at times. By illustrating this relationship, Golding is able to present both an intriguing duality and represent the two characters as the "Id" and the "Ego”.
This story shows that the evil around us can sometimes deceive us into wrongdoing if we do not trust our moral instincts or trust those in higher positions than us. William Golding, the author of Lord of the Flies, used his work to show the public that fear can lead people to destruction and evil ways if we do not attempt to control the beast within us. The way that Golding showed his audience this, was by carefully and thoughtfully placing symbolism throughout the novel and in each and every character.
Even though Golding had an enormous amount of symbols throughout his novel, Simon is the first to recognize the complication posed by the beast and the “Lord of the Flies” that is, that the monster on the island is not a real, physical beast, but rather a savagery that lurks within each and every human being. As a final point, the loss of social structure within civilization can lead to the demise of the boys on the island whether it's between Ralph vs Jack, the boys vs the island, or even Simon vs
William Golding’s novel ‘The Lord of The Flies’ tells the story of a group of English boys isolated on a desert island, left to attempt to retain civilisation. In the novel, Golding shows one of the boys, Jack, to change significantly. At the beginning of the book, Jack’s character desires power and although he does not immediately get it, he retains the values of civilized behaviour. However, as the story proceeds, his character becomes more savage, leaving behind the values of society. Jack uses fear of the beast to control the other boys and he changes to become the book’s representation of savagery, violence and domination. He is first taken over with an obsession to hunt, which leads to a change in his physical appearance This change