preview

Comparison Of Sympathy And Caged Bird

Decent Essays

There have been many injustices throughout history, like slavery and discrimination; this is the time where two poems take place; “Sympathy” and “Caged Bird”. Maya Angelou and Paul Laurence Dunbar describe how it is like to be discriminated and separated, through their poems “Sympathy” and “Caged Bird”. However, they did not convene to generate these poems. Dunbar innovated the metaphor of a caged bird and discrimination. In her poem “Caged Bird” debuted in 1969, Maya Angelou writes about a character that is a caged bird who cannot fly and is separated from other birds. Paul Laurence Dunbar also writes of the struggle of a caged bird, who cannot become free even after eating the bars of his cage, in his poem “Sympathy” broached in 1889. Both writers explain the situations of caged birds and their desires to be free. In the poems “Sympathy” and “Caged Bird”, caged birds both sing for freedom, however, one is more confined than the other; “Caged Bird” is more meaningful, because the bird is unable to fly, and is emotionally affected by that.
“Sympathy” and “Caged Bird” …show more content…

The bird in “Sympathy” is able to fly. “I know why the caged bird beats his wing/...for he must fly back to his perch and cling” (8, 10). The caged bird has enough freedom to be able to fly and try to break down his cage. Therefore, the bird has more freedom. In conflict, the bird in “Caged Bird” has less freedom and is more confined in his cage. “But a bird that stalks/ down his narrow cage/ can seldom see through his bars of rage” (8-11). The bird cannot fly in his very small cage; this makes attacking his cage very difficult. On the contrary, the caged bird in “Sympathy” can fight his cage, while the bird in “Caged Bird” is diffident and doesn’t have enough space to do so. The bird in “Sympathy” is able to fly and fight the bars of misery; while the bird in “Caged Bird” cannot do because his cage is

Get Access