I. INTRODUCTION Defendant SARAH MINER, owner, and operator of the Portola apartment complex, recently denied Plaintiff DARLAWILLIAMS, a former tenant, application to continue leasing her unit at the complex. Plaintiff subsequently brought suit against Defendant, alleging discrimination as the basis for her denial. The Plaintiff 's case against Defendant, however, is without merit. Defendant denied Plaintiff 's application because she received several noise complaints throughout her tenancy, disrupting
wrongdoing in his individual capacity (“Officer Defendant”) and 2) authorizing the Locals to pay fees for attorneys representing the Officer Defendants in advance of a determination on the merits of the Government’s Complain. The first time they met in court was in February 1990. They met in order to show cause why a primary injunction should not be entered which would remove certain Officer Defendants from office very quickly, not allow all Officer Defendants from engaging in racketeering activities,
Ethnicity and the Police Part I: Outline Eileen Garcia CJA/344 Cultural Diversity in Criminal Justice June 17, 2013 STEPHEN HUMPHRIES Police corruption and citizen complaints relative to ethnicity I. Introduction A. Police corruption Police corruption has become an international problem. This was initially a common practice during the period when the police institutions were being developed but the effect has been felt by many people, even affecting peacekeeping operations. The police
Attorneys for PlaintiffRANDY LAW | | SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO RANDY LAW, Plaintiff, v.PIPER REED, Defendant. | CASE NO. Lawyering Skills 1 Complaint Filed: August 31, 2012Trial Date: TBDDiscovery Cutoff: Motion Cutoff: | Plaintiff Randy Law, for his cause of action against Defendant Piper Reed complains and alleges as follows: PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Randy Law (“Plaintiff”) is a twenty-four year old student, at all times herein mentioned, is a third
Plaintiff complains and for causes of action alleges as follows: Joeli Rosario is and has been a resident of the City of San Francisco, County of San Francisco. Her current address is: 1418, South Van Ness Avenue. The Connie’s Costume Shop is a sole proprietorship organized and existing under the laws of the State of California with its principal office located at 1685 Bryant Street, San Francisco, CA 941103. Plaintiff is ignorant of the true names and capacities of Defendants sued as Does
I. INTRODUCTION Defendant SARAH MINER, owner, and operator of the Portola apartment complex, recently denied Plaintiff DARLAWILLIAMS, a former tenant, application to continue leasing her unit in the complex. Plaintiff subsequently brought suit against Defendant, alleging discrimination as the basis for her denial. The Plaintiff 's case against Defendant, however, is without merit. Defendant denied Plaintiff 's application because she received several noise complaints (Exhibit 1) throughout her tenancy
occurrence when painting wood surfaces) and that he would come back in a year to perform additional touchups if needed. However, the plaintiff failed to raise any complaints regarding the painted surfaces until she informed the insured in April 2014 that the paint on the cabinets was cracking. After receiving the plaintiff’s complaints, our insured’s painting subcontractor contacted the plaintiff and offered to remedy any issues regarding the paint. The plaintiff never informed the insured that
1970, plaintiffs filed their complaint as a class action, attacking the constitutionality of statute 12 of Act 48. The plaintiff’s class was comprised of students and parents who attended the affected Detroit public schools. The Complaint named the Governor of Michigan, the Attorney General of Michigan, the acting State Superintendent of Public Instruction, the State Board of Education, and the Board of Education of the city of Detroit as defendants. The complain originally asked for a preliminary
of justice as the rest of us, or do they receive special treatment in the legal system? If convicted how, do their sentences compare to those of a majority of those in our justice system? In this paper, I argue that celebrity status does give a defendant a number of major advantages, the most important being that they can hire the kind of legal representation that the average person could never afford. Where most people arrested for DWI, drug possession, public indecency or shoplifting have to use
in Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16) protects the Constitutional rights to freedom of speech and right of petition by subjecting any cause of action that chills these rights to be subject to a special motion to strike. In the context of a complaint against an attorney for malpractice, the California Court of Appeal recently clarified its application under existing precedent and held the anti-SLAPP statute did not apply to claims against attorneys by former clients. In Loanvest I, LLC v. Utrecht