Complaint : Complaint, And Complain Of Defendants

drinking the coffee she detected a sharp object in her mouth which became lodged in her throat and caused her to choke. The plaintiff claims that she pulled her car over to the side of the road and removed the object from her throat and mouth. In her complaint, the plaintiff describes the metal object as a hook, which had been served to her in her cup of coffee. The plaintiff asserts that she sustained the following injuries: “bleeding and swelling of her throat, tearing, and significant puncture wounds

follows on knowledge as to himself and his known acts, and is informed and believes and thereby complains and alleges as follows: I. PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. Plaintiff, STEVEN OLIVA [hereinafter “Plaintiff” or “Oliva” or “Mr. Oliva”], was at all times relevant hereto, a resident of the State of California, County of Riverside, a former employee of the County of Los Angeles, and an employee of Defendants, and each of them, as Cablecaster working out of the Company facility located at 4781 Irwindale

I. INTRODUCTION Defendant SARAH MINER, owner, and operator of the Portola apartment complex, recently denied Plaintiff DARLAWILLIAMS, a former tenant, application to continue leasing her unit at the complex. Plaintiff subsequently brought suit against Defendant, alleging discrimination as the basis for her denial. The Plaintiff 's case against Defendant, however, is without merit. Defendant denied Plaintiff 's application because she received several noise complaints throughout her tenancy, disrupting

Heber Concepcion Courtroom #3: United States District Court, Southern District The third and final court visited was the United States District Court. The United States district courts are the trial courts of the federal court system. Within limits set by Congress and the Constitution, the district courts have jurisdiction to hear nearly all categories of federal cases, including both civil and criminal matters. Everyday hundreds of people across the nation are selected for jury duty and help decide

San Francisco has another wrongful termination suit in the news. A worker from Madera named Jason Pimentel claims that he was the victim of wrongful termination. Pimentel filed his complaint on June 13th against Velex, Inc., Nexius Solutions, Inc. Included in the complaint are a number of alleged violations. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Wrongful Termination (a.k.a. Wrongful Dismissal) is a legal phrase that refers to any situation in which

I. INTRODUCTION Defendant SARAH MINER, owner, and operator of the Portola apartment complex, recently denied Plaintiff DARLAWILLIAMS, a former tenant, application to continue leasing her unit in the complex. Plaintiff subsequently brought suit against Defendant, alleging discrimination as the basis for her denial. The Plaintiff 's case against Defendant, however, is without merit. Defendant denied Plaintiff 's application because she received several noise complaints (Exhibit 1) throughout her tenancy

Ethnicity and the Police Part I: Outline Eileen Garcia CJA/344 Cultural Diversity in Criminal Justice June 17, 2013 STEPHEN HUMPHRIES Police corruption and citizen complaints relative to ethnicity I. Introduction A. Police corruption Police corruption has become an international problem. This was initially a common practice during the period when the police institutions were being developed but the effect has been felt by many people, even affecting peacekeeping operations. The police

Attorneys for PlaintiffRANDY LAW | | SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO RANDY LAW, Plaintiff, v.PIPER REED, Defendant. | CASE NO. Lawyering Skills 1 Complaint Filed: August 31, 2012Trial Date: TBDDiscovery Cutoff: Motion Cutoff: | Plaintiff Randy Law, for his cause of action against Defendant Piper Reed complains and alleges as follows: PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Randy Law (“Plaintiff”) is a twenty-four year old student, at all times herein mentioned, is a third

courts have C J with state courts, meaning that both state and federal courts have Jurisdiction over the case. (notes: 有些 cases 只能在 State 或者只能在 federal Courts 解决，而不能 concurrent J. 例: Patent cases must be litigated in the Federal system.) - The defendant has the option to remove the case to an federal district court (因为 federal Courts 的 judges usually better than state court) - The plaintiff has the option to remand (召回) the case back to state courts 2. Specialized Federal Courts -

Discovery is presented so there would be no surprises. All relevant facts and document must be summated to the defendant before it goes to trial. There are three layers to discovery, written discovery, document production and deposition. Written discovery are question and answer that is being ask, it could be now in the present or it could be question about the past