Compromises In The Northern And Southern States During The Years Of 1820-1860

In an essay that incorporates the textbook, lecture and power-point notes compare and contrast the compromises of 1820 and 1850.

As tensions between the North and the South rose on the issues of slavery and states’ rights, numerous compromises were proposed to ease the conflict. Such compromises included the Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and the Crittenden Compromise. These compromises had intentions of defining where slavery was permitted and clarifying states’ rights. They were only temporary fixes to a more pressing issue. Between the Missouri Compromise and the Crittenden Compromise, a series of events changed the political atmosphere of the United States and prevented any more compromises on the institution of slavery from being passed.

The Political Disputes of 1820-1860 compromised and then broke down.In the 1800’s slavery was the main conflict between the states. The compromise began to break down when slavery began in the North and the South. The Anti-Slavery Convention report that an American citizen who owns a human being into involuntary and is forced to be his property is a Man Stealer, which means immoral people. (Doc.B) Senator Henry Clay said that it is impossible that South Carolina ever desired a moment to become a separate and independent state.(Doc.A). Senator Daniel Webster’s Judgment is that the South is right and the North is wrong.(Doc.C). Georgia thinks all northern, and especially the New England, states are devoid of society fitted for well-bred Southern gentlemen.(Doc.E) Abraham Lincoln ambitious Northern politicians. (Doc.F) Henry Clay, National

The arrangement was to decide whether or not slavery was going to be allowed into the new western territories. The South knew that if slavery was not allowed into the west then there would be more free states than slave states, and that meant that slavery would most likely be removed from the country. Congress then decided to make an equal amount of slaveholding and free states. The compromise worked at first, but it eventually collapsed several years later (The Missouri).

Slavery at this time, had grown to be an extremely controversial topic due to Southern beliefs of state’s rights and Northern morals. Southern states loved slavery due to the traditions, culture, and its’ economic power. Before the implementation of the Compromise, both sides were highly heated towards

A huge example of a compromise includes the coexistence of the new 13th, 14th and 15th amendments and Jim Crow laws (black codes). The new amendments were a success for republicans (who primarily were part of the Union in the North), because they promoted equality among the races by first freeing slaves, followed by giving freedmen citizenship and suffrage. These amendments, however, were not supported by Southern democrats. To make efforts to keep the country stable, “black codes” were implemented. These were laws that kept white and black people separate in social and legal situations such as in marriage, schools, restaurants and recreational games. This brought up the new idea of “separate but equal”. With this segregation, it soothed former Confederates knowing that the two races would be separated. Another reason the South needed to stay

The issue with compromise is that it must give each party the sense they have won something or at least not suffer a total loss. Why then, did the Compromises of 1820 and 1850 not prevent the Civil War? Because neither set of laws directly addressed the right to own slaves. A country cannot have two sets of laws for two different regions. As we have seen with segregation and gay rights, deferring to states’ laws only works to delay addressing the issue at hand. While no one can say the Civil War was solely caused by the divisive issue of slavery, it is safe to say the North and South were polarized. The Civil War had to happen to force the country to stop compromising and declare a winner and a single set of rules to live by.

In the early 1800’s, the US worked out issues, such as slavery, with compromises. The names of these compromises were, but not limited to, The Missouri Compromise, The Compromise of 1850, and Kansas Nebraska act. These were meant to appease the states without leading to secession. Later on, around 1860, the US compromises weren’t working well, and this lead to the secession. This was because the states wanted decisions and instant ends to issues such as slavery.

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 The Missouri Compromise was an attempt by the U.S. government to maintain the balance of power between the slave holding states and the free states in the U.S. Congress. Although the Compromise was initially successful in preserving the peace of the Union, it was only prolonging the unavoidable conflict that would happen four decades later. In 1819, the United States of America consisted of a total of 22 states, with 11 slave-holding states, and 11 free states.

Please identify and explain what each compromise entailed and how it impacted the issues of slavery and expansion.

The Compromise of 1820 was an attempt to halt the expansion of slavery. Maine was added as a state but with a prior ruling stating the number of slave states must equal the number of non­slave states, Missouri was admitted as slave state with the agreement that future states (bought during the Louisiana Purchase) north of the latitude marking Missouri’s southern border would be free, while all future states south of the latitude would be open to slavery. But the Missouri Compromise did little to resolve the answer of slavery. The Kansas­Nebraska Act nullified the Missouri Compromise allowing the states to determine their slave status through popular sovereignty. The Missouri Compromise drew a specific line in the country which divided its

What mainly lead up to the civil war was not only a separation of ideas such as nullification, or the federalist idea of large government. The compromise of 1850 essentially told the northern states that they have to return slaves. This infuriated the northern states, which were already divided about the institutions of slavery. However, with nullification deeply imbedded in the hearts and minds of northerners, they felt as if this was a down right attack on the rights of the

The controversy over the extension of slavery into western territories contributed to the coming of the Civil War in many ways. Previously, the Missouri comprise admitted Missouri to the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state, preserving the fragile balance in Congress. However it did not apply to new territories that were not part of the Louisiana Purchase, and so the issue of slavery continued to fester as the nation expanded. During the election of 1848 slavery was a huge controversy. After two years of increasingly volatile debate over the issue, Kentucky Senator Henry Clay proposed another compromise to reduce tensions; Henry Clay had proposed ‘The Compromise of 1850’. The compromise was consisted into five parts; admit California

Although one should compromise when they can, that option should not always be entertained. In various cases, the immediate inclination to settle with the opposition has led to cataclysmic consequences. Furthermore, that scenario has played out in numerous occasions in history, one notable instance being the compromises on the subject of slavery from the United States which resulted in the outbreak of the American Civil War. While numerous individuals at this time, especially politicians, accepted the compromises as a solution to war, some men such as William Lloyd Garrison, refused to believe in any reasonable compromise in the subject matter. In addition, the controversy of compromise occurs in the 21st century, although it has proven

Coming back to disagreements and poilitical issues that began soon after the American Revolution. There were a number of circumstances that led the United States into a excruciating civil war. The problems between the North and the South grew more intense between the years 1800 and 1860. Although i twas not the only one, slavery was the central issue of the conflicts. There was another point of major disagreement between the two sides in the involved taxes paid on goods brought from foreign countries. It was called tariff. Southerners felt that those tarrifs were unfair toward them and were doing in purpose because they imported a broader variety of goods than Northerners.