Computer Matching And Privacy Act Of 1988

2 The Privacy Act 1988 (Commonwealth) is the law that explains the professional, ethical obligations related to privacy and confidentiality,

Children's Online Privacy and Protection Act of 1998, 15 USC § 6501 et sec. (2000).

Information Commissioner’s Office (2012) Introduction to The Data Protection Act 1998. [Online] Available from: http://www.ico.org.uk/~/media/documents/library/Corporate/Research_and_reports/ico_presentation_EVOC_20120528.ashx [Accessed: 11th October 2013]

The Data Protection Act 1988 – This act covers the rights of an individual. Written, confidentially, retrieval and handling of verbal information.

The relationship in the middle of gathering and scattering of information, innovation, people in general desire of security and the legitimate and political issues encompassing them. However, the Data Protection Act 1998 is an Act intended to ensure data held about people. All associations including health and social care organisations must enroll as an information client and take after the principles gave.

Protecting the privacy of patient information is one of the top priorities of all healthcare providers and is specifically required by various state and federal laws. On February 17, 2009 the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA, sometimes referred to as “the stimulus”) included provisions making significant improvement in the privacy and security standards for health information was signed into law by the federal government (http://www.hpsafind.hrsa.gov). Included in this law is $19.2 Billion which is intended to be used to increase the use of Electronic Health Records (EHR) by physicians and hospitals; this portion of the bill is called, the Health

Privacy Act 1988’s purpose is to standardize how personal information is collected, stored, used, disclosed and how this information is accessed. There’s 13 Australian Privacy Principals that relate to Government and Private sectors handling information. Stipulations for credit reporting, and health and medical research professions accessing and managing information when unable to seek consent.

When comparing the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, both have privacy and security rule,

While I trust the government and support their policies, you, the federal government, have failed us Americans. When attempting to gain information for an investigation, nearly 22.1 million innocent Americans have been exposed to the public with their personal information hanging by a thread, according to the Washington Post. You politicians may assume that justice is served by providing victims with incentives of extra security technology, but the federal government should not be allowed to gain information from personal devices for their investigation. Furthermore, the use of malware to hack these innocent Americans is an invasion of privacy, ruins devices and their data, ensues lawsuits and their costs with unnecessary breaches, and may even put people’s lives at risk.

This is the Legislation that relates to this, Data protection Act, protects personal privacy and upholds all individual’s rights. Health and Social Care Act 2008- Essential standards and the Freedom of Information Act, GSCC (The General Social Care Council) ICO (Information Commissioner’s Office) also my employers Policies and Procedures.

While advancements in technology are continuously on the rise, so are the concerns of how they will affect the privacy the fourth amendment protects. The question of how modern technology will violate the natural rights of the people can not only be asked by society, but also by law enforcement officials. Officers would have to distinguish the surveillance techniques that contravene the law of privacy from those that do not. In the case Kyllo v. United States (2001), the police used a thermal scanner to read the heat signatures given off by Kyllo’s house. Their intent was to find abnormal heat patterns, search the home, and therefore confirm their suspicions of marijuana growth. While they were successful in finding illegal activities being

According to Dictionary.com confidentiality is “the right of an individual to have personal, identifiable medical information kept private.” The definition for this term is widely known in health care, but when it is applied to adolescents many people do not understand the basics. Doctors are responsible for informing adolescent patients and their parents the privacy a minor is given according to federal and state laws, but in some cases doctors fail to do so. This results in the misunderstanding of minor’s privacy rights, which can lead to the adolescent patient not disclosing significant information, and the parents assuming they have the right to all of their child’s medical records. Because of this, it is important for adolescents and their parents to understand the nature of confidentiality in health care.

a) Data protection Act (1998) – DPA ‘It is the main piece of legislation that governs the protection of personal data in the UK.’ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Protection_Act_1998).

Children's Privacy Act of 1998. (n.d.). Retrieved January 17, 2012, from Federal Trade Commision: http://www.ftc.gov/ogc/coppa1.htm

Act was made law in 1984 but was replaced by a new Act in 1998 to