Contraceptives Research Paper

Over the counter birth control pills have been a topic of discussion for many women. Some might say it would pose many risks such as not receiving medical checkups and not knowing the side effects of birth control pills. Others may see it as a helpful to women because of the convenience of accessing the pills and not having to take time to schedule appointments. Additionally, due to health care and insurance policies some women might not have an easy access to birth control pills but the cost should not be a factor. Although over the counter birth control would allow an easier access for women, there are reasons why a doctor’s visit and a prescription are required to receive birth control pills.

To begin, Crystal Eastman first published her article in 1918. She produced the source for a large target audience. The article was originally published in a radical journal called Birth Control review. The source’s purpose was to inform women that, whether the law stated so or not, they had a choice as to whether or not to conceive a child. The purpose of the source is to demand that women take control of their bodies. “I would almost say, that the whole structure of the feminist’s dream of society rests upon the rapid extension of scientific knowledge about birth control.” (Eastman, Pg.510).

Healthcare professionals are faced with a multitude of ethical and legal conundrums. Since the introduction of birth control in American history, healthcare professionals have been put in situations to either follow their own moral and ethical beliefs, or choose to follow the law and give healthcare services to those who seek it. A large constituent to the disapproval of contraceptives other than natural family planning, is health professional’s religious beliefs. In addition, Adolescent females who need contraceptives are less likely to seek access to health care providers for these contraceptives in fear of personal information due to their age being released. Through the research provided, cases of pharmacist denial of prescribed or over the counter contraceptives to women have been the majority of conflict in this nation and in others.

Birth control is the practice of preventing unwanted pregnancies, especially by use of contraception. It also can be define as control of children or offspring born especially by preventing the frequency of conception. As there are many type of birth control method including hormonal method, barrier method, intrauterine device, natural method and emergency contraception. For hormonal birth control method is split into two types. The first one is combined contraceptive pills that contain two hormone (estrogen and progestin ) to prevent the pregnancy happening. As the function for combined contraceptive pills is to stop the ovum release and make the mucous of cervix become thick so it can stop the movement of sperm cells. The advantages for

One of the great hypocrisies of American culture is found in its health care system. The United States claims in its Declaration of Independence that “all men are created equal” and that all of these men have the inalienable rights to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Yet this is the same country that allows over 120 people to die each day because they are uninsured. How can this nation claim that all are created equal and have a right to life when they deny healthcare to those who cannot afford it? This issue has come on the scene relatively soon, having only truly been discussed beginning in the early 20th century. Since that time, a fear of socialism stemming from tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union throughout the century has placed a stigma on the concept of universal health care because it is similar to the Soviet’s socialized medicine. In recent years, President Obama made great strides toward universal health care by passing the Affordable Care Act, but some would argue that while America is on the right track, more can be done to care for the nation’s poor. Others argue that the economic impact of such policies could cause problems for America. Though creating a universal health care system has complex logistical and economic consequences, health care is an internationally acknowledged human right and should not be denied to the American people.

Oral contraceptive has been a controversial topic for years. Oral contraceptives are a common form of birth control. Birth control is used to prevent pregnancy by blocking a male’s sperm from fertilizing a female’s egg. Women take birth control to prevent pregnancy. Also, teen women can prevent unwanted pregnancies by having access to over the counter birth control pills. Birth control pills should be available without a prescription.

Statement of Issue: Health insurance coverage has been chronically problematic for the United States for decades. Conservatives and Liberals have continuously argued about the challenges that America’s healthcare system faces and how insurance and payments ought to be handled. The main issues concerning Americans include: cost, access, and quality of healthcare. Most citizens are provided health insurance through their employers.6 However, problems concerning birth control coverage through employers have sprouted; an example of a contraceptive case that has been evaluated would be Burwell v. Hobby Lobby in January, 2016.3 Without easy access to birth control millions of women will face numerous problems; for example:

The Center for Disease Control conducted a study on contraceptive use; their findings concluded “four out of five women have used birth control pills” during one point of their lives (Basset). Birth control pills have been around for over six decades, and their popularity has significantly increased during the past decade. Thousands of sexually-active women are turning to birth control pills as a way to prevent unplanned pregnancy, regulate periods, and to control acne. Nonetheless, birth control pills are synthetic hormones that influence the female body in severe ways. In fact, doctors and media are not presenting the menaces of consuming birth control pills in women; instead, they disguise the risks with commercials of synchronized

The U.S Supreme Court had to deal with an issue regarding birth control and religion. For instance, private owned companies, such as Hobby Lobby, can now refuse to cover certain kinds of birth control to their employees in their insurance plans. This requirement was put into place because of the 2010 Affordable Care Act. The supporters of the ruling believe it is an act of religious freedom. A couple of years later a pharmacy, Ralph’s Thriftway, was denied a hearing before the Supreme Court. The owners of Ralph’s Thriftway refused to stock emergency contraception, such as Plan B because of religious reasons. Plan B I suppose to be effective within a couple of days, to abort. But the state law of Washington requires pharmacies to stock an assortment

In modern day society, birth control is remotely routine. Four out of five women rely on hormonal contraceptives to inhibit their ability to conceive. With consequences blatantly delineated, women continuously risk the odds. The amount of women at risk makes it notably essential that we understand the effects of such birth prevention thus forcing the question what is affected. Sex has often been spoken for in relation to possibly affected variables from birth control. "With the increase in research aimed at developing new treatment methods for women's sexual dysfunctions over the past several years, a better understanding of the link between women's sexual functioning and satisfaction is called for" (Meston and Trapnell p2). Being hormonal beings prior, one could only assume the disjustice additional hormones are doing to a body. "Yet, to our knowledge, no studies have examined the relation between what constitutes satisfaction and what constitutes distress within sexual realm" (pg 2). With the sexual satisfaction scale to measure the intimacy, low scores would

Overtime, scientist created a more efficient “Stem Pessary”, by mixing synthetic estrogen and progestin to block sperm cells from reaching the ovaries. They decreased the size and made it an oral pill, making it easier to consume. The Birth Control pill wasn’t legal in the United States until 1960. “As sexual relations outside of marriage and for reasons other than childbearing became more socially acceptable and women seeking careers sought family planning methods, the environment was ripe for introduction of this discreet, easy-to-use form of contraception,” (NPR). Women started taking birth control pills daily because they were 99% effective and ultimately a cheaper option than condoms.

The transdermal patch looks like a square band-aid that’s about two inches by two inches in size. It’s made out of thin plastic, has adhesive on one side, and comes in one color — fake-white-person-skin-color, often called beige.

Within the pro-choice world there are many issues that are discussed like abortion, the instant where life begins and the use of contraceptives. This article will focus on not only the issue of using of contraceptives, but specifically the distribution of oral contraceptives (“the pill”) to teenage girls without their parent’s consent.

Taking a stance on women’s right and allowing the privilege of freedom or control of our own bodies has been a tough battle for a long period. Let’s consider the fact that with the generation of today’s socio-economic level teens are far more advanced with technology, driving, media, as well as within the work force. The implementation of birth control has already taken in stances educationally. For instance, in middle school and junior high curriculum is the sexually education and home economic courses. The courses provide teens with knowledge of encounters with sex, pregnancy, as well as birth control. Thus, stating introducing teens to emergency contraceptives such as plan b would not be considered non-age appropriate. Plan B is an emergency

In between the years of 1914 up until 1921 of the birth control pill was starting to be developed. Activist Margaret Sanger opens the first birth control clinic in Brownsville, Brooklyn, and starts the American Birth Control League, the precursor to Planned Parenthood. A few years later, in 1934, an Endocrinologist Gregory Pincus uses a test tube and a rabbit to help develop a contraceptive device. About seventeen years later, specifically in 1951, Sanger meets Pincus at a party in New York, and this is where Sanger persuades Pincus to help out with work on a birth control pill. Meanwhile, in that same year another chemist from Mexico city, named Carl Djerassi, creates a similar pill. He does this by synthesizing hormones from Mexican yams. Even though pill has been invented, Djerassi isn’t equipped to test, to produce, or to even distribute it. This in turn means that Sanger and Djerassi are competing in a way. About a year later, in 1952 Gregory Pincus tests progesterone in rats. From this experiment Pincus figures out that it actually works. Afterwards, he meets gynecologist named John Rock. Rock already began testing a chemical contraception for women. The next year, Katherine McCormick who is a biologist, a women’s rights activist, writes Pincus a check for $40,000 to conduct research into furthering research about the pill. From this large amount of money, Rock and Pincus are able to conduct the one of the first human trials. The trials is based off of fifty women that