Contract Act 1950 Essay

The other element of agreement is acceptance. An acceptance must be made on the same term as the offer and can only made by the person who the offer is addressed to. Meanwhile, an acceptance must be made while the offer is still in existence and it must be made in an acceptable form which means that the acceptance must be made in the same manner of the offer was offered. Lastly, the acceptance is effective when communicated.

An acceptance of an offer is “ a manifestation of assent to the terms thereof made by the offeree in a manner invited or required by the offer.

An offer is the manifestation of the willingness to enter into bargain, so that the offeror understands that he may enter into the bargain freely and that assent to the bargain will complete the transaction. Bill presented an offer to Sara to

Pat was very frustrated because she wanted to purchase a home but lacked the funds or credit to do so even though Pat was expecting shortly to receive a one-half million dollar final installment payment for some land she sold several years earlier. Dan knew that Pat was very interested in purchasing a home and approached Pat with a proposal to assist Pat in buying a home. Dan told Pat that he would help Pat with the financing. After finding the home she wanted to buy for $250,000, Dan and Pat orally agreed that Dan would purchase the home and "when you come up with the money, I (Dan) will sell it to you (Pat) for $250,000 plus a fair commission to be determined."

P2 EXPLAIN THE LAW IN RELATION TO THE FORMATION OF A CONTRACT IN A GIVEN SITUATION

‘Acceptance is a definite and unqualified assent to an offer, on all of its terms. Any acceptance given conditionally will not result in a legally binding agreement.’

The offer and acceptance model is flawed- only an agreement is necessary. In order to fully comprehend this statement, we must first establish what constitutes and offer and what constitutes acceptance. “An offer is a statement by one party of willingness to enter into a contract on stated terms, provided that these terms are, in turn, accepted by the party to whom the offer is addressed”. Acceptance is “…an unqualified expression of ascent to the terms proposed by the offeror”. The “Offer and acceptance model” is based on the court’s adopt the “mirror image” rule of contractual formation. Applying the definitions stated above, we can take this to mean that there must be a clear and unequivocal offer which must be matched by an equally

An offer is defined as: The manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain, so made to justify another person in understanding that his assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude it (pg. 493). The parties to an agreement are, the offeror and the offeree. The offeror is the party making the offer, and the offeree is the party receiving the offer to enter into an offer. Basically, the offeror promises the offeree

Offer- An offer is a proposal involving one of the parties offering something of value to the other party in the agreement. Both parties are allowed to reject the offer. For example, buying a second-hand car, a person interested in buying the car makes an oral offer of $16,000.

In Carr v J.A. Berriman Pty Ltd, the principal entered into a contract with a builder for the construction of a factory. Two breaches by the principal caused the builder to seek to terminate the contract; a failure to deliver the site in the condition specified in the contract and a unilateral decision to remove from the contract the fabrication of steel framing. It was the second breach that was decisive in the view of the High Court in finding that the termination was effective. In its reasons, the Court noted that the loss of the fabrication represented about one quarter of the builder’s estimated profit on the entire project and the removal from the contract of that percentage of the overall value was a substantial breach.

To be an offer, a statement must contain a promise/s and not just a statement to supply information as exhibited in the case of Harvey v Facey . In order to determine whether the statements made by Choy were a promise we

according to American laws, a contract must have terms that do not only certify an agreement between two parties but can be used to prove its legality some elements that are involved in the contract include offer and acceptance which are the two major elements of any contract between two parties. Central to the formation of a contract is an offer which is accepted by the other party involved in the contract or agreement and in most cases, a price may be paid to make the contract legal. According to the United States contract law, the price payable in a contract agreement can be a free will of the parties involved in the contract without

for it to qualify as a proper contract in the eyes of the law: offer

In BROGDEN v METROPOLITAN RAIL CO it was held the railway company had accepted by placing orders since the amendment of the document, and in TRENTHAM LTD v ARCHITAL LUXFER the court used the 'reasonable man' to identify whether or not there has been acceptance. Both cases seemed to have reasonable outcomes; therefore the courts had been provided with satisfactory rules to help them reach a appropriate verdict. There are various different rules regarding acceptance. There must be a communication of acceptance from the offeree to the offeror. The case of YATES BUILDING v PULLEYN deals whether there had been a prescribed acceptance or not. It was held that there was no practical difference to the offeror therefore the acceptance method was binding. However in the case of ENTORES LTD v MILES FAR EAST CORPORATION there was no prescribed acceptance, yet it was held that the contract was formed in England as that was there acceptance had been received by telex. Other rules that can be used to decide whether there has been acceptance include a waiver of communication of acceptance; silence, which isn't a valid acceptance; ignorance, generally there isn't a binding contract; and acceptance via post using the postal rule. The postal rule can often be misused, as it states that a contract has been formed as

An offer is an expression of willingness by one party to contract on certain terms with another party with the understanding that the contract will become binding when accepted by the person to whom it is offered. An offer may be made in different ways, such as in a letter, an email, or even your behavior, so long as it conveys the basis on which the offering party is willing to contract. An offer should consist of: (1) a statement of present intent by the offering party to enter into a contract; (2) a specific proposal that is certain in its terms; and (3) a communication that identifies the person to whom the offer is made. If any of these elements are not present, an offer has not been made. (Walker, C. B., 2012)