INTRODUCTION
The present research paper dwells on contrastive analysis of pleonasm in Ukrainian and Anglophone political discourses. In political texts in general and speeches in particular, ideas and ideologies need to be conveyed through language, words and expressions are used in different ways to affect the meaning. Language system has great potential of redundant language means which can be imployed in speech in various ways. Redundancy in representing meanings of notions is a basis for a pleonasm. Elements which at the first sight lack meaningful load may contribute to coherence and cohesion of a text, underlining and justifying its main idea. Difficulty of defining pleonasm as a language phenomenon causes its ambiguous interpretation in modern linguistics.
Ukrainian and foreign scholars turned to the issue of pleonasm many times, regarding functional and stylistic aspects of the phenomenon in particular. Among them we have to mention such scientists as John Berkman, V. Vinogradov, S. Denysko, D. Holobaev, L. Kulishenko, A. Saharovskyi, A. Selivanova, V. Shyprykevych, I. Yaroshchuk and others.
Texts within the political discourse have been researched by a great number of scholars. The following ones have to be mentioned:
The purpose of this paper is intended to summarize my views on what has influenced my understanding of politics and government prior to taking this class, and how my understanding is now since completing this course.
There was a great deal of emotion inherent within politics and this oftentimes boiled over during senate hearings and other events. This is one element of politics that is effectively demonstrated by the source here because it is able to utilize quotes and tie these quotes to some of the most important singular elements of character within these individuals. In the process, the author is able to create something of a profile within each of these major historical figures, and this is important because it allows each of these figures to represent a different priority or concept within politics in general. As such, there are a number of clashing ideals within politics that are effectively mentioned in this source, although, it should be noted, the source is comparatively shorter and as a result, many of these philosophies and concepts simply are not given the attention they
The first of four qualities Postman describes is most easily explained as “polysemy.” To Neil Postman, the use of literary language in speech correlates to the general public’s understanding of this style of phrasing. He states, “…the use of language as a means of complex argument was an important,
Part of the course to which the task refers: Part 4- Literature, a critical study
Chapter 13- there are a lot of instances where political works can be found in literature. For example, in Heart of Darkness with the relationship between the pilgrims and the cannibals. A lot of the time the cannibals acted more put together and humane than the pilgrims. This expressed the relationship between the people and the governing body not only in the U.S. but overseas as well.
Your task is to do a close reading of a public document, summarize it, and then analyze its rhetorical situation. Use the sample rhetorical analysis from the textbook (pages 57-60) as a flexible guide—not as a rigid model. Your analysis will contain a few more features than the one found in the book. How you organize your analysis will depend in part on the writing you choose and in part on the decisions you make about how to arrange the parts of your analysis.
How does the composer of your supplementary text represent (techniques) the ideas of people in politics?
‘Political power often involves a struggle for control.’ To what extent does your study of people and politics support this statement?
With the exception of Key 1949, a masterful study of Southern politics, few political science works have
Question One: Discuss how political leaders of the time have influenced the selected author’s writings.
Part of the course to which the task refers: Part 4- Literature, a Critical Study
Many authors’ viewpoints have been observed so far, ranging from Plato’s Republic written centuries before the common era, to Ta Nehisi Coates’s Between the World and Me. Though these books span millennia and hemispheres, they all display what is important to their authors, and from this information we can try to extrapolate their political viewpoints, especially where it falls in the lunacy of the 2016 election. The authors Plato, Ta-Nehisi Coates, and Karl Marx had perhaps the most politically-charged books, and some have viewpoints very similar to the viewpoints of Bernie Sanders, having the most “far left” viewpoint, Hillary Clinton with a moderate left viewpoint, and Donald Trump, whose viewpoint ranges from extreme right to moderate, depending on the point in the election. Through its authoritarian and conservative government, it is clear that The Republic bears a shocking similarity to Donald Trump’s policies, while both the overthrow of the bourgeoisie in The Communist Manifesto and the correction for the plunder of the black body in Between the World and Me agree with the viewpoints of Bernie Sanders.
political philosophers of their time. Many nations have used their strong rhetoric to create their
Political theory is the study of concepts that allows for the analytical study of relationships between political institutions. Over the centuries, political theorists have established renditions of what political theory is. This essay will focus on Plato, Nietzsche, and Aristotle, and their works, which respectively define the concepts of the common good and the significance of philosophers to the welfare of the state, self-deceiving intellect and the power of authority over our intellectual lives, and the concepts of interdependency and the importance of virtue and happiness for a successful political framework.
Noam Chomsky is one of the foremost linguists, and political theorists, still fortunate enough to be gracing the presence of the earth in physical form. In many respects, the definitive Chomsky publication, On Literature, serves as an introduction to some of the intellectual's key ideas that have influenced the field of linguistics. However, there is an immediate, rather glaring contradiction that rears itself early and often throughout On Language, which is primarily the fact that since this work is supposed to be an introduction of Chomsky's thought on linguistics, it deals with many of his notions on a somewhat cursory level. Yet, there are a number of assumptions made throughout the work in which readers are expected to be already familiar with some of the linguists concepts. To that end, this treatise may pose a certain level of difficulty for those who are not familiar with presets for understanding Chomsky's work, while for others who are familiar with his ideas, it may be somewhat dissatisfying to perceive the lack of depth this book presents about such notions.