Corruption in Law Enforcement
Nicholas Colbert
University of Texas at El Paso
Corruption in Law Enforcement Corruption has always been a problem. From the beginning it was embedded into law enforcement. Corruption is not just a problem that affects a few people. In the long run many lives are affected and often ruined. There are many people in law enforcement that abuse their powers, but thanks to a few good people, everyone can enjoy having law enforcement agencies that really look after the people, execute their job functions, and try to better themselves as well as the agency they work for. Unfortunately, as technology changes, so will people. Corruption will never go away and when people in law enforcement are being corrupt,
…show more content…
Wardens served warrants and acted as detectives. They also recovered stolen property and did street patrol. Wardens typically were not liked by the people. It was quoted “Colonial law enforcement was inefficient, corrupt, and subject to political indifference.” (Walker, 1999) The cities quickly grew by the 1800s and had to find a better form of law enforcement. Sir Robert Peele then introduced municipal policing. He believed that the police should be organized and should be familiar with the neighborhoods they were to police. He felt that the officers should be humble and look presentable. Sir Robert Peele supported the territorial approach. By 1870, Peele’s strategy had spread to every major city in America. In the 1800s day watch systems were also established in some of these major cities. By the mid 1800’s both day and night systems were combined to provide protection all day. In the early 1900s there were many advancements to policing making it more professional. On July 26, 1908, the Federal Bureau of Investigation was formed and on March 16, 1909 they became official. During this time technology also had an impact on policing. Phone use, radios, and car patrol became common. The cities grew, policing have improved, but there was no centralized form of government. Small departments acted independently and the larger departments had smaller precincts that sometimes acted as small departments. The colonists did not want a centralized government because
Corruption has always been a danger to law enforcement, just as it has been a danger to all of mankind since the beginning of time. Since the very first police agency was formed in the 1800s, corruption has been widespread. The 19th century was an era in which politics played a very large role in police forces. Various political parties essentially had some police departments in their pockets, and as long as officers served to further those political parties’ agendas, the officers’ continued employment was guaranteed. Since politicians have not always been known for being straight-laced, one can easily see how corruption within police departments became prevalent. Since officers were not serving the people, but rather the political elite, their motives were constantly in question. It was not long before politicians began employing police officers to overlook and even protect their illicit activities. Through this practice, officers began to see the potential monetary and political benefits of allowing and participating in certain illegal actions. Even after the establishment of countermeasures such as police commissions, civil service exams, and legislative changes, corruption remained rampant. This corruption was perhaps best exemplified by none other than the actions of many officers within the Rampart Division of the Los Angeles Police Department.
From the first police station built in Boston to what is today's modern police force there has always been corruption inside the criminal justice system, whether it be something as little as a small bribe to look the other way, or something more serious like getting away with a major offense. The department of justice has had trouble from top to bottom with corruption and it has proven to be a difficult problem to fix. When policing in the U. S. were just starting out corruption and law bending was more prevalent but harder to see which Police officers who were following the rules and who was bending the law in their own favor to gain an advantage for themselves rather than looking out for the community as a whole. This is because when policing first started out there were limited officers, which meant less word of mouth and less people to respond to and
It is obvious that police officers are using their jobs as law enforcers to obtain illegal items and are shamefully betraying their police departments. The policemen who were involved in this drug smuggle were veterans. When people think of veterans, whether it be a veteran of war or a veteran of a police department, we think of someone who has devoted many years, served and been loyal to the service. People have admiration for veterans and recognize them for being committed to the service as well as being faithful to every year they have been involved in it. Now the four veteran police officers from Chicago will be spending time in prison instead of adding more years to the service of policing. Those years that the veteran police officers were dedicated to the policing is now history, they could have helped lower crime rates in Chicago, but instead they are facing prison time.
What is Police corruption? In legal dictionary Police corruption is defined as “The misuse of police authority for personal gain”. Personal gain can mean monetary payment or any other type of benefit. Corruption is not a new or uncommon obstacle facing the police departments. The problem goes far back as the forming of the organized police forces. Police corruption is a problem that hurts both the police organization and the society. Since its beginning many aspects of policing has changed; however, one aspect that has remained unchanged is the corruption within the police departments. In my paper I will be looking into an instance of police corruption scandal that happened in Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD). What gave rise to corruption,
Corruption in the law enforcement field is something that some departments may face and experience. Corruption can be defined as any unlawful and improper conduct that is conducted by a law enforcement officer to gain benefits for oneself or others (Delattre, 2016). According to an article by Klas, The Department of Correction in Florida is currently experiencing some
“I am the law” (Copping Out, 57). Just because one is given power, does not mean they are powerful. The badge and gun mean nothing but line or duty. The duty or officers is to serve and protect, right? The serving part is down, but he “protect” part could use a little work. The police corruption rate has risen in the past few years, due to carelessness and dishonesty. There have been reasons behind the problem, such as racism, immigration, and simply abuse of authority among officers. There have been many reports of this type of misconduct toward innocent people, for years. Power can only be taken so far, when it comes to balancing what is fair and what is not. Some take advantage of power, for their own benefit. Sometimes the people trusted
There is much seriousness about the issue of white-collar crime. What is white-collar crime you may ask. White-collar is defined as, ‘a generic term for crimes involving commercial fraud, cheating consumers, swindles, insider trading on the stock market, embezzlement and other forms of dishonest business schemes. The term comes from the out of date assumption that business executives wear white shirts and ties. It also theoretically distinguishes these crimes and criminals from physical crimes, supposedly likely to be committed by "blue collar" workers.” Many people do not realize how serious white-collar crime is. There are many different forms of white-collar crime, our textbook states, “white-collar or economic crime includes (1)
Police corruption today is becoming an issue more and more. Today’s police, especially in densely populated areas, are well known for using excessive force on ethnic minorities, lower classes such as the homeless, and sexually abusing women and children; whether directly or indirectly. Anyone who does not follow the orders of the police, regardless of laws, is subject to police corruption and imprisonment. In cases of anticorruption the officer, judge, or public official is removed from their position by the corrupt establishment within a short amount of time. This systematic approach to corrupt political governship can be seen daily across the country causing public outrage, protests, and in some cases even riots. Why police are corrupt, and the biased system that supports corruption against minority races, lower class citizens, and females.
obtain financial gain, other personal gain, or career advancement for a police officer or officers
The broad or basic dictionary definition of corruption is dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power, typically involving bribery ("Corruption |Usage Example Sentence, Pronunciation, Web Definition | Google Dictionary."). My definition of corruption is the same, but my definition of corruption in law enforcement is different. This is my definition of corruption in law enforcement; when officers of the law are apart of officer misconduct and corruption which are abuses of their police authority. The misconduct and corruption refer to a wide range of different procedural, criminal, and civil violations. Officer misconduct is the broadest category, it is "procedural" when misconduct refers to officers who violate their police departments rules and/or regulations; it is "criminal" when misconduct refers to officers who violate state and/or federal laws; it is "unconstitutional" when misconduct refers to officers who violate a citizen 's civil rights. The most common forms of officer misconduct are the excessive use of physical and/or deadly force, discriminatory arrest, physical and/or verbal harassment, and selective enforcement of the law. People who are corrupt in law enforcement create a negative perception of the United States legal system. What is corruption and where is corruption in our world?
We all know that Police Officers and those involved in Law Enforcement are typically good people who we entrust to uphold our laws and rules in society. For them to be able to do their job however we grant them several privileges that that empower them more than the average citizen. Their status at times can make them appear above the law since they are the ones upholding and enforcing it and with all due respect I believe mostly of those individuals are responsible and respectable however as we know from history time to time such privileges an lead to corruption and the abuse of power which they are granted. The following CNN news article contains a hint of some of the corruption that can take place. Taking place in King City California a rural and agricultural area recently where 6 police officers along with the former chief of police were arrested for several charges including conspiracy. Accusations claimed that the arrested officers took advantage of their powers and would impound the cars of local citizens typically those in the lower class and poor with the goal of those victims not being able to afford the impounding fees and then selling the vehicles to make a profit afterwards. The owner of a local towing company was also arrested being believed to be part of the corrupt officer’s conspiracy. Dean Flippo who is the District Attorney of Monterey County believed the conspiracy would take the following steps in order. First one of
Kara (2009) found numerous examples of law enforcement corruption and harassment during his ethnographic study of sex trafficking. For example, the police harass Silpa a sex slave turned Garhwali (brothel owner) by constantly demanding bribes of $1.50 per prostitute residing in the brothel, which equal $150 US dollars (Kara, 2009). Furthermore, Silpa claimed the police officers were the most corrupt in India and paying off the police was the biggest expense in running her business (Kara, 2009). Silpa noted, during the raids, prostitutes are arrested and brothel owners and customers are free to go (Kara, 2009).
A reason corruption within the department is happening may be a result of officer training. The thing that is drilled into an officer's head during training is officer safety (White). If an officer is placed in a situation where they feel threatened, they may sometimes act inappropriately. While the statement regarding officer safety might be true, it could get into some officer's heads. The meaning can then change, and evolve into something it’s not. These officers apply this mindset to other aspects of the job. They begin to believe that they are more important than the citizens they have vowed to protect.
out that a violation of a specific institutional rule or law does not in itself constitute an act of corruption (Milner, 2016, p.25). Ideally, this implies that the act of taking a bribe by a police officer or harassing an inmate cannot be considered corruption if it does not result in a corrupting effect. Milner’s insight shows the problem of definition and application of corruption because some acts by police officers can be considered corrupt but other might not on moral ground or law. Similarly, Newburn and Webb (1999) pointed out that police corruption is what constitutes a breach of trust bestowed on the police. They argued that the “special trust” might be violated in two ways. First, it may be corrupted when the trust is used to provide service for money, and secondly when the police officer commits a crime under cover of the trust. Moreover, Newburn and Webb (1999) further argued that the definition of corruption must pay attention to both the means and the end of the activity. Ideally, Newburn and Webb (1999) offer a realistic definition of police corruption because it looks into the “means” and “end” of an action rather than the outcome only as Milner stipulates. Nevertheless, police corruption entails a broad perspective as defined by Punch (1985) and cited by Newburn and Webb (1999), he defines police corruption as occurring:
Police corruption is defined as the abuse of police authority for personal or organizational gain (Schmalleger, 279). The idea of police corruption can cover a broad spectrum of misconduct that is unbecoming of a public official. In a generalization, however, police corruption is a dishonest approach or the abuse of the power given to an officer of the law in order to benefit personally as an end result. A minor examples of police corruption would be an officer accepting money to not enforce the law when duty demands that he should. This is known as bribery and though it may seem minor, it still constitutes a major ethics violation within law enforcement. Other examples of police corruption would be extortion, theft, lying under oath, drug usage or dealing, or in extreme cases-even violence