Critical Review of Two Articles with the Concept of Interpellation

1737 Words7 Pages
When creating the title for their book, which is dedicated to Stuart Hall, perhaps Paul Gilroy, Lawrence Grossberg and Angela McRobbie did not know that they not only found an exact citation to summarise all the works of this influencing cultural theorists, but also proposed the best phrase to describe Cultural Studies, that is "without guarantee". Indeed, Cultural Studies devotes itself to questioning knowledge "guaranteed" to be true in society and more important, to continuously raising debates as its fundamental method to avoid any "guaranteed" answer. As a central concept of Cultural Studies, "interpellation" precisely reflects those features. First proposed by Louis Althusser in his essay "Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses…show more content…
These two parts, as he interprets Althusser, rule each other out in a way that "the external conditions of ideology cannot be comprehended from within ideology, the institution of interiority necessarily brings about the denial, or better a disavowal of external origin." (1993, p.76) It is in this acknowledgement are located an assumption that ideology and science are two opposed concepts and that science as the grasping of materiality is the suspension of interpellation. In other words, interpellation model of Althusser could be labelled as "either - or alternative", that is, "either the materiality or subjectivity; either the exterior or the interior." (Dolar 1993, p. 77). However, this distinction apparently becomes problematic when being applied to analysis the complicated situation of a theoretician who engages with scientific work and thus takes a non-subject position , yet "is as much of an (ideological) subject as anybody else, the illusion being constitute for any kind of subjectivity and thus ineluctable" as "he cannot escape.. his non-scientific existence." (Dolar 1993, p.76) In the light of this realisation, Dolar (1993) criticises Althusser's clean cut as "inadequate" and "insufficient" (p.76), explaining that if we pull ideology and reality in different directions, there will be moments in subjects, as in the case of theoreticians, that interpellation cannot cover for we do not know
Open Document