In the Wikipedia page over the Cuban Revolution it is really interesting that Fidel and Che’s face both represent the faces of the revolution in contrast to the Fidel Castro documentary, which does not mention Che at all. One of the first things that the second paragraph mentions is the relationship between Cuba and the United States and how relations have only begun to improve recently. The Wikipedia page of the Cuban Revolutions mentions a lot of the implication of the Cuban Revolution and the results of the Cuban Revolution. This is important because it suggests that the document has been altered to match the current political situation between the United States and Cuba. The Wikipedia page for the Cuban Revolution provides a lot more information …show more content…
But because Minister is writing from an American perspective he does not mention the involvement of the United States in Cuban affairs until the Cold War. This could suggest that we are getting a biased perspective. Another observation about this source is that while it does provide more insight on the leadership of the Cuban Revolution it does not go into as much detail as the Wikipedia page about the Cuban Revolution. The article takes a lot of time to look at the military tactics and the mobilization of people into the military. It is a lot different from any of the other sources because it takes the time to describe the people’s perception of the revolution and how they functioned under the Batista regime. While it does not go into as much factual detail as the Cuban Revolution Wikipedia page it is clear that the intention of the author is to inform an audience that does not have much knowledge over the Cuban Revolution. This article would be useful for someone who was interested in the sequence of events and not the motives behind the Cuban
That there are 12 murals created in town between 2001-2007 murals depicts a beloved mayor who governed for 20 years. Some of the murals in Cuba are the Cuba city jail, 19-drive in theater, Bob’s gasoline alley, history museum, and Hayes shoe store, etc. The Viva Cuba organization completed its first mural in 2001 with plans to complete 12 more. In 1928 an emergency plane landed by Amelia Earnheart in the area is captured in another mural. Paul T Carr, Philips 66 station opened in 1932 to see how it would go, he opened at the 4 way intersection. Back then people called it the 4 way intersection now these days we call it the 4 way. On the chimney there was a P for the owner Paul people thought it stood
The U.S.’s relationship with Cuba has been arduous and stained with mutual suspicion and obstinateness, and the repeated U.S. interventions. The Platt agreement and Castro’s rise to power, served to introduce the years of difficulty to come, while, the embargo the U.S. placed on Cuba, enforced the harsh feelings. The two major events that caused the most problems were the Bays of Pigs and Cuban Missile Crisis.
After analysing all of the source’s mentioned above, it is evident that all three authors have very diverse perspectives on the Cuban Revolution. Whilst it may seem to Source A’s audience that the author (Alistair Cooke) is simply trying to inform the American public of Castro’s leadership after examination, it seems as though they are trying to brainwash readers into rebelling against Castro. Thus, the Source is considered anti- Castro. Comparatively, in Source B, Herbert L. Matthews reports on an exclusive interview with Castro’s best lieutenants, Major Che Guevara to present the audience an anecdote which portrays a strong sense of patriotism, pride and authority which are all factors that present the audience with Matthews pro- Castro perspective. Additionally, Source C’s perspective is also in Castro’s favour as the Source is secondary and means that the author could see the context of the situation without being restricted by any element of bias. Meaning that, he was able to see all the events that occurred after Castro took over
Brittmarie Janson Perez, author of Political Facets of Salsa, writes, “Late at night, in a discotheque in a Latin American country whose political system is dominated by the military and is not particularly known for its respect for human rights, a crowd is dancing salsa, a generic term covering Caribbean dance music” (149). This has been and continues to be a very commonly accurate depiction of many Latin American countries. Since Cuba was founded in October 1492, its government and politics has been characterized by brutality, corruption and instability. Nonetheless, involvement from foreign nations and its deeply engrained Spanish roots has without a doubt had a significant impact on the transformation of what Cuba is today. In this paper, I will explore the pros and cons of the 1959 Cuban Revolution through the examination of the historical context of politics and how it impacted the social atmosphere.
Question 1: Outline the perspective of the source: Source A: Source A written by Alistair Cooke, gives us insight into an extreme American nationalist’s (as the guardian is an American newspaper) perspective on Fidel Castro. The source aims to inform readers that Fidel Castro is now the leader of Cuba. It also tells readers about Castro and questions how he was able to become leader as he is portrayed as weak and manipulative. This is evident in the following extract: “Batista’s domain could be conquered by an angry, though wealthy young man, whose first putsch against the island on December 1, 1956, left him with only twelve of the original force of 93 men”. The Guardian highlights this statistic to show his inability to protect those under
In the wake of 1896, it was clear Spain had endured failure during the Cuban Rebellion. The Spanish and their leader, General Valeriano Weyler, had to come up with a way to take back control of their colony which the Cubans had seem to overtake. General Weyler was a cruel unjust individual who had mischievous ways of how he envisioned on taking back the control of his colony. General Weyler convinced a large segregation of Cubans to live in Concentration camp, claiming it was for their protection. What the Cubans did not know was that they going to endure torture and pain until the end of their life. With a reconcentration policy enforced by General Weyler, Cubans had to report to the camps within a certain amount of days, or else they would
On January 1, 1959, Fidel Castro and his band of rebels overtook the Cuban government. Their Revolution was based on massive agrarian reform and equality throughout. It was not based on Communism or communistic ideals. The US government was against the rise of Castro and his people. They had been able to control the Cuban government by controlling the successive presidents, since the Spanish-American War early in the 20th Century. The rise of Castro was undertaken with a distinct anti-American flavor to it. Castro was able to expand his popularity by fusing the anti-American fever with massive reforms intended to give social and economic equality to all Cubans. The economic presence, of the US, within Cuba was great at the time of Castro’s
A revolution is known as being an activity or movement designed to effect fundamental changes in the socioeconomic situation. Cuba during the decade of the 1950's experienced this type of rebellion in search for an enhanced and better-developed society, independent of all outside domination. Cuban citizens were at a point where they needed to be free and be able to enforce the constitution established in 1940, which included amendments stating that Cuba should be a "democratic republic shall not conclude or ratify pacts or treaties that in any form limit or menace national sovereignty or the integrity of the territory," and such. I chose this topic because there has been so much controversy
The Cuban Revolution was touchy topic for the United States and Cuba. America’s alienation of Cuba didn’t help when communism from the USSR was brewing over the revolution. When the revolution gained Castro as its leader, the worry and hatred from the United States was unbearable, especially when the Soviet Union landed in Cuba to interest Castro in its aid. The US’s fear of communism, Fidel Castro, and aid from the Soviet Union was significant because it changed the US’s political role in Cuba during the Cuban Revolution.
The Cuban Revolution, which began in the early 1950’s, was an overthrow of a very corrupt government. It was an attempt to improve the conditions of the Cuban people, but the path was covered in blood and sweat and an informed historian has to ask, was it really worth it? How much actually changed?
Dreaming in Cuban is a novel by Cuban American author Cristina Garcia. This essay focuses on the impact of the Cuban revolution and its effect on identity within the Cuban diaspora. This essay argues that Dreaming in Cuban illustrates the impact of the Cuban revolution on women and how it has affected their identities as Cuban women. Therefore, this essay will assess the structure of the novel, it will identify key historical, and geographical contexts in which these events took place. The essay will examine the use of characters and how they represent the different experiences of the Cuban revolution. To conclude, this essay will discuss the significance of focusing on the experiences of women, and how gender may have shaped their
Until sugar production made Cuba the wealthiest agricultural region on earth in the nineteenth century, the island was considered relatively diverse, compared to others in the Caribbean. The quality of soil was universally unparalleled, and gained countries interest. Although the French and Spanish were in feud over the island, merchants from Portugal, England, and Holland participated in trade, which brought diversity to Cuba. At the end of the eighteenth century, the Haitian Revolution changed the racial, social, and economical demographics on Cuba. Seeing that the Haitian revolution was a triumph of colossus proportions, the individuals who started it, embodied the spirit that initiated the great uprising. From the late eighteenth century, into the nineteenth century, formally freed slaved from Haiti migrated to Cuba in astonishing numbers. This not only altered the demographics on the island, it brought in a new workforce that proliferated local sugar production. Within a short period of time, Cuba became the biggest sugar cane producer in the world. The United States gained interest in capitalizing from the islands newfound wealth, and being close in proximity made the temptation of interfere with France and Spain irresistible. In the late nineteenth century, the United States interfered with Cuba’s fight for independence and increased their investments tenfold. By the beginning of the twentieth century, the US gained control of the island through ownership,
Castro’s involvement with the foreign and domestic politics during the early Cold War period greatly influenced the outcome of the Cuban Revolution. Without the actions taken by foreign powers like the United States and Russia, some events on the domestic front may have had very different results. It is important to understand how every nation’s foreign policies can influence more than just one other nation, and this was especially true for Cuba. It was this mix and chain of events which produced the communist Cuba that we are familiar with today.
The Cuban revolution was the spark that ignited the flame of communism in Cuba. The developing nation gained independence only as recently as 1898, and was already filled with an atmosphere of distrust and resentment towards the United States. In July of 1953, a revolution began in Cuba between the United States backed President Batista and Fidel Castro. Fidel and his brother Raul Castro lead a series of guerilla warfare battles against the forces of President Batista. “I am Fidel Castro and we have come to liberate Cuba,” stated Fidel Castro. In January of 1959, Fidel Castro became the President of Cuba. With the regime of Fidel Castro, Cuba would fall to communism.
The passage of the article that is most interesting to me was Mixed Views on the Revolution. The revolution thrilled million in Latin America and Cuba. It showed that the arrogant Americans can be defied. The Americans cut the united states of America purchases sugar. Then America put a blocked all trade from Cuba. It banned every U.S. product except medicine and