DBQ Essay: How The Constitution Protects Against Tyranny

The first guard against tyranny was Federalism. Federalism means the power given to the states, central governments and the powers that they both share. Document A states that the central government can regulate trade, conduct foreign relations, and declare war. Federalism protects against tyranny because the central government and state government have enough power that they do not control everything. James Madison states that "the different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself."

Another way to guard against tyranny was the checks and balances; that all the different branches of government can disagree with something that another branch is doing in order to keep everything in the government fair. One way that the constitution shows this is when it is put that the other branches can veto something that another branch is doing because it may be unconstitutional. (Document C) Checks and balances protects against tyranny because it make sure that one group in the government can do anything that would be unconstitutional. (Document C) For example, ‘congress can approve presidential nominations and impeach the President from office, but the President can veto a Congressional legislation. (Document C) Another example is the president nominates judges, but the Court can declare presidential acts unconstitutional. (Document C) Another example is the court can declare laws unconstitutional, but congress can impeach judges. (Document C) Checks and Balances protect against tyranny.

A third way that the framers used the Constitution protects against tyranny was checks and balances. “...The constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they check on the other...” The main goal is to make sure that each of the three branches have control over each other but still separated. This protects against tyranny because each branch has powers the control one another. In document C it states how each level of government limits and balances each other out to keep the powers even, and how

“Give me liberty, or give me death.” We must diminish tyranny among our government. How did the United States accomplish this? After the Revolutionary War, the Founding Fathers decided to construct a government that was of the people, by the people, and for the people. By doing so, they needed to prevent the more than likely possibility of overbearing power falling into the hands of one or a few people, in other words a prevention of tyranny was needed (1769). This structure was stated in the Constitution, a written document that framed our American government, and so the Constitution declared four ways to prevent tyranny: Federalism, Separation of Power, Checks and Balances, and the Great compromise.

Tyranny is a monster; a dictatorship in full force, and one operation that can demise the greatness and the tenacious power of a country within months. But the United States of America, the country with the longest standing Constitution in history, disregards tyranny as impertinent, as George Washington had once said, “A free people ought not only to be armed, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which may include their own government.” The United States Constitution encompasses the fundamental laws and provides the guarantee of many basic rights to the citizens of the country. It establishes the national government of the United States. The document

The constitution is a plan of government that lasted for over 200 years, it was a strong foundation that had room for flexibility. It was written in May of 1787 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to replace the Articles of Confederation, the former plan of U.S government. Tyranny is the control of all power by one person or group. The colonists believed that King hb

small states. The larger states are not more powerful than the smaller states. All population appoints the House of Representatives. Each state at least has to have 1 senator some states get more the 1 and some states only have 1 senator. They all have the same amount of powers. According to the constitution article 1 section 2 “Representatives… shall not be apportioned … according … to (population) …… the number of representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand, but each state shall have at least one representative. “ Meaning the government makes them have the same amount of power so they can check one

Tyranny is something all developing countries risk while forming their new governments. In the Constitution of the United States, the Founding Fathers put a large amount of time and thought to make sure America did not become just a another country that fell to the merciless trap of tyranny. America had just won a war to separate itself from the controlling jaws of Britain. So, one of America’s main concerns as a new country was to create a government that could never eventually evolve into a tyranny. Thus, the Constitution (signed in 1787) was passed, laying the foundation for a tyranny-free government led by the values of equality and freedom. The Constitution of the United States of America protects against a potential tyranny in the government through federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and big states versus small states.

The Constitution guards against tyranny by having checks and balances. Checks and balances is when each branch of government holds some control over the other two branches. The Executive branch can appoint judges in the Judicial. The Judicial branch can declare laws unconstitutional in Legislative. The Legislative branch can override a veto in Executive. (The American System of Checks and Balances diagram). Checks and balances guards against tyranny because as each branch is checking over each other in order to see if they are doing anything

There are three branches in Congress, such as the Judicial, Legislative, and Executive. They keep each other in check, and make sure corruption does not take over. There are ways that the government branches are controlled by each other, as stated in the Constitution, in 1787. The question that is mainly being asked is: how did all these measures help the government avoid tyranny? Tyranny in question is when too big a level of power is placed in one’s hands, and they use it unfairly. The Constitution guarded against tyranny by including there being three branches, federalism, and checks and balances in the structure of government. This prevented the start of corruption, unfairness in governing,

When delegates met in 1787 they aimed to create a new constitution for a stronger central government. The delegates deemed the older Articles of Confederation weak because there was no court system and government didn't have enough power to tax the states. The delegates decided to draft a new governing document because they needed a stronger central government.The previous governmental charter, the Articles of Confederation, failed because did not guard against tyranny and had a weak stronger government..Anti-federalists and Federalists pushed for a government that was strong enough to hold the states and the people without letting

The states get their power from how many representatives they have, it depends on their population. Bigger states have more representatives because they have a bigger population. The bigger the state the more say and power you would have, because they have a larger population and smaller states have less say because they have a smaller population. The senate allows two senators per state, so that helps smaller states more, because even though they have a smaller population they still have the same amount of senators as bigger states. Each state gets two senators no matter what the population is. The U.S. constitution protects us against tyranny by using congressional

small states which means that the size of a state should have a input on whether it has more say in the government than one less of it size. One way that the documents show that this is in the constitution is when it says that the representatives should be put in service according to the amount of people in the state. It also shows another point when it says the senate should have two senators that are chosen to serve for a term of six years. Big states vs. little states protects against tyranny because it makes sure that the small states are not discriminated against because their size that they shouldn’t have the same amount of say as the larger states in what happens in the government around that serves

Tyranny can be found in several forms, which is why we need several defenses against it. In 1787, our new country held a Constitutional Convention. Delegates from most of the states came together to fix the Articles of Confederation, our first constitution. In the end, they decided to make a whole new constitution, a written government plan, that could hold our states together and protect us from tyranny. As we had just recently freed ourselves from a situation of tyranny by one with King George III, it wasn't a scenario that we wanted to repeat itself. The job was to frame, or structure, a brand new plan that could do this. The Constitution still continues to protect us because it was a strong document with a strong plan. The Constitution

Federalism is one of the ways that helps defend against tyranny. Federalism granted powers to the central government and to the state. They share a portion of the powers between them, as shown in the diagram, like the power to take and borrow money (Doc A). With overlapping powers, neither groups would have complete control, yet would retain enough power to subdue any uprising made by the other party. Also, with the certain rights given to the states, if one person dislikes certain laws made by the states, they could change their residence to another state with more favorable laws, if they prefer. James Madison himself wrote that "The different governments will control each other at the same time that each will be controlled by itself." (Doc A). The reason Madison brings this up is because under the Articles of Confederation, the central government had little control over the states. The states were not required to pay taxes under the Articles of Confederation. If this were in act today, then the government