preview

Danforth's Discourse

Decent Essays

Danforth’s duty as a judge forces him to deviate from his moral convictions which ultimately defines his character as being confused and conflicted. Danforth’s dedication to protecting the voice of law forces him to abandon his personal and moral values. As the village is scheduled to hang seven more people including Proctor and Mrs. Nurse, Parris tries to persuade Danforth to postpone their hangings. Danforth responds saying “While I speak God’s law, I will not crack its voice with whimpering” (Miller 129). In his response to Parris’ proposal Danforth describes the language he speaks as god’s law. Danforth’s use of the word god reveals the origin and reasoning behind his statements as being largely influenced by god. As a result, Danforth’s strong dedication to being a …show more content…

Danforth, in his discourse, also attributes god’s law with having a voice. He states in the second half of his assertion “I will not crack its voice with whimpering” (Miller 129). Such an attribution, by Danforth, suggests that god’s law has a voice separate from his own. The use of the words crack and whimpering suggest that Danforth sees it as his duty to protect the voice of god’s law from external influence. In this particular situation, Danforth protects law’s voice from collapsing by quickly denouncing outside influence caused by Parris. However, Danforth’s remarks also suggest that he is protecting law’s voice from himself. Although Parris instigates the whimpering in this situation, Danforth’s claim that “I will not crack its voice with whimpering” also suggests that he will not let his voice or moral values interfere with that of law’s. He refers to the person cracking law’s voice as “I” which reveals that he refrains from letting his moral ideals as well as that of others “crack” the voice of law. Danforth’s

Get Access