The Dangers of Bible Prophecy While the study of prophecy is very important, it is vital to recognize the common dangers found in studying Biblical prophecy. Without caution, Biblical prophecy can become harmful. A student of prophecy should be wary of many pitfalls to avoid becoming heretic or with a wrong view of prophecy.
Motives
The first set of dangers fall under the category of one’s motives. If a student of prophecy is constantly seeking new truth, their motives quickly turn from seeking God and His wisdom, to seeking out truth. When this happens, the person goes off on a tangent, looking for information simply to have it. Another danger involving motives is studying prophecy just to prove a point. My students of Biblical prophecy wish to delve into this study simply to prove themselves right or another wrong. From this issue, the problem of taking verses out of context appears. Seeking God’s Wisdom and prophecy should be done with the intent to further His Glory and Kingdom, not one’s own ego. Next,
…show more content…
God is all knowing, however, as His creation, man does not understand fully God’s wisdom and knowledge. This needs to be recognized by the student of prophecy. First, there is a lot of data and information that man does not know, or have access to. This missing information could be vital in wholly understanding a prophetic word, however, without the guidance of the Holy Spirit, man is lost. This missing data can leading to fixing dates and identities of the antichrist falsely. While it is tempting to make such guesses, they are merely guesses, not absolute truth. This missing data leads many students of prophecy to speaking on areas of the Bible that are both silent and have little to say about a particular subject matter. This is dangerous due to the fact that there is little Scriptural evidence to back up an prophetic claims, making it very
According to this view, the events in Revelation are not tied to any specific events historically or in future. It reduces John’s prophesies to a one simple ‘big picture’ idea about the continuing struggle between good and evil (Gundry, 2012). Though there is some truth to this summary, the idealistic approach is heading towards the mindset that Boxall warned his readers about. The idealistic view seems to emphasize the analogy aspect of Revelation, as if it was only written to hold devotional value. This approach would be good to use to gain a simple understanding of the overall theme of Revelation, but should not be the sole perspective used to interpret the book.
The prophets are difficult to interpret mainly due to misunderstandings about their function and form (Fee/Stuart p182). Most dictionaries define the word “prophecy”as ‘foretelling or prediction of what is to come. Using the prophets in this way is highly discerning, for less than 2% of OT prophecy is messianic; less than 5% describes the new covenant age and less than 1% concerns future events (Fee/Stuart p182). The prophets usually announced the immediate future of Judah, Israel and the surrounding nations, rather than our future. Those events were forthcoming for them but past for us (Fee/Stuart p182). The primary function of prophets as a spokesperson was to speak for God to their own contemporaries. Of the hundreds of prophets in
Some people may believe that prophecy and apocalyptic literature is a well-known subject because there are lots of books and papers concerning it, but there is still so much that will always be misunderstood. Prophesy and apocalyptic literature may have some similarities but they are structurally different in a way that makes them distinct. This paper will address prophecy and apocalyptic writings and determine the differences between them by using Daniel and Amos as templates.
Throughout the course of the semester, we have constantly talked about and expressed the idea of reading the Bible in a historical context. Picking out the pieces that coincide with evidence that has been found with archeological findings, the accuracy of dates, and important people. The critical study of the Bible is to look at the book as a piece of historical text. The use of our “historical lens” allows us to pick out to various pieces that appear to be factual. Using this analysis of looking at the Bible through our “historical glasses”, we can understand the true meaning of the Bible in its original historical setting.
The purpose of this paper is to research and analyze the preterist and futurist views of interpreting the Book of Revelation and determine which view provides the most accurate Biblical interpretation. As Richard L. Mayhue states, the "word 'preterist' comes from the Latin term praeteritus which basically means 'past' in regard to time." A preterist interpretation of the Book of Revelation, therefore, asserts that incidents described therein have already come to pass. A futurist interpretation, on the other hand, suggests the opposite namely, that Revelation is a prophecy of things to come.
The third looming prophecy has yet to completely be fulfilled, however a significant amount of ongoing issues indicate the contents within the prophecy may possibly be on the verge of resurfacing in the near future. Contrary to the previous restorative prophecies, the message of the prophecy located in Ezekiel chapter thirty-eight predicts destruction. The language within the prophecy states, “When my people of Israel are established securely, will you make your move? Will you attack that land of Israel? Fueled by blazing jealousy, I tell you that then there will be an earthquake that rocks the land of Israel. I’ll order all-out war against Gog. I’ll deluge Gog with judgment: disease and massacre, torrential rain and hail, volcanic lava pouring down on you and your mobs of troops and people.” By approaching current ongoing events mindful of the emphasis Ezekiel placed on recognizing the inevitable destructive forces around him before they happened, society today is reminded that there are situations that are uncontrollable, and
* No unconditional prophecy has been unfilled. The time (Daniel 9), city (Micah 5:2), and nature (Isaiah 7:14) were foretold in the Old Testament about Jesus’ birth.
Commencing the Olivet Discourse, Jesus provides a premonitory prophecy pertaining to the inevitable rise of false prophets/teachers (Matthew 24:3-5, 23-28). Similarly, in the wake of his imminent martyrdom, Peter writes a final letter warning about false teachers and exhorting believers to remain vigilant. In concluding his letter, Peter writes, “Therefore, dear friends, since you know this in advance, be on your guard, so that you are not led away by the error of lawless people and fall from your own stability.” These admonitions are not anomalous, as the Bible addresses the issue of false prophets/teachers no less than 65 times. Accordingly, the Christian must remain observant, diligently studying the Scriptures in order to
This chapter is dedicated to the relationship between the narrative and dialogue aspects of the biblical text and how that relationship can grant readers insight into the nature of the characters as well as foreshadow future events.
Prophecy involves a situation in which one or more messages are allegedly communicated by a god. The messages usually involve something that inspires, interpretes, or revolve of a social world and events to eventually come. Prophecy is not limited to one culture. It is a common subject known to all ancient societies around the world, some more than others. This essay will revolve around how prophecy is the main theme in both texts.
There is much speculation as to who the Antichrist. I know him to be an evil alliance, a deceiver, a murder, liar, a man, or sinister individual or any individual who denies the Person of Christ; and in denying the Son you deny the Father. Some are saying his appearance is still in the future. Others say he appeared long ago in the days of ancient Rome. The bible doesn’t give us any specifics as who and where the antichrist will come from. But does indicate that he is alive today and will play a vital role in the final events of Earth’s history.
As Lewis Chafer notes, continuity in the Bible is best shown through the fulfillment of prophecy (164). Christ is the fulfillment of the Old Testament prophecies. And the Second Coming of Christ is the expected fulfillment of the New Testament prophecies. In both cases, and throughout the Old and the New Testaments, "highways of prophecy" are directed towards Advents of Christ.
The forces that can undermine somebodies character are pride, arrogance, and jealousy. The bible says that you should not covet what another person possesses. You should appreciate what you have and not be obsessed with someone else’s possessions. The Bible also says that having pride and arrogance can lead to your downfall. You should not act like you are superior to anyone else and you treat people with kindness and respect. If a person works well with others, they won’t be prone to being prideful, jealous or arrogant. A good person can be tempted to do bad things and not live a righteous life.
The second question is extremely important. As disciples, the Bible should be our reference for all issues we face in life. It’s critical that we understand the Bible in view of the overarching narrative of the whole story rather than viewing it as a collection of snippets of advice. For example, Jeremiah 29:11 is often translated as a verse that relates to an individual’s bright future. People quote Jeremiah 29:11 and use it as an assurance that life will work out in the end for their good. In reality, Jeremiah 29:11 is a verse directed at the entire nation of Israel essentially saying that deliverance will come, but it won’t come for another 70 years. We need to read the Bible to discover what it’s saying to us. We can’t use the Bible to proof text and create the
Verse 4 looks forward to the time The Antichrist will present himself in the rebuilt Jewish Temple in Jerusalem 3 ½ years (halfway) into The Tribulation. There will be some who read this marvelous verse and conclude, “The similarities between The Antichrist and Donald Trump are a curiosity, but wild statements that appear as if swiped from a script of a “Lord of the Rings” film are too sensational for me to accept.” If you feel that way, it is probably because you are either a materialist convinced that the physical world is all that exists, or a Christian whose theological conclusions cannot allow the possibility of such interpretations. My answer is that you still must wrestle with the statistical impossibility that between 2000-3500 years ago, prophets penned such accurate, complete and detailed accounts of our contemporary life.