David Moran And Gavitt Case Interview

Again in March of 1989, an outbreak of fire coincided with another arson investigators conference. At the scene the same filter-tipped cigarette and matches,

As I, Klaudia Hoxha (forensic technician), approached the crime scene at 4 o'clock pm at the residence of Josh Powell. As i approached the scene i noticed 4 reporting officers, and the fire fighters who put the fire out, were present at this two story single family dwelling. I approached the reporting officers and fire fighters and took copies of there reports. I then immendently, sent in my team to take pictures and any kind of evidence they can find. From the looks this residential seemed occupied. A fire expands horizontally and vertically from it's point of origin, which in this case is the center of the house. According to a report, i noticed a witness who was a member/ social worker from Powell's meeting groups ,gave a statement that

Facts: A fire was evolved on September 23, 1981 in a log cabin due to a hot plate. The hot plate was left on with an accelerant and kerosene near by. The owner of the cabin, Henry Xavier Kennedy was convicted of Arson as he obtained an insurance policy for $40K on the cabin five days prior to this fire and police found evidence that the construction business owned by Mr. Kennedy was losing money, and Mr. Kennedy's alibi was insufficient to eliminate him as a suspect.

1. The work contained within this assignment is my own work, and is not directly taken from any other source.

Cameron Todd Willingham – In 1992, Willingham was convicted of arson murder in Corsicana, Texas. He was believed to have purposely set a fire that killed his three kids. In 2004, he was put to death. The Texas Forensics Science Commission didn’t find out UNTIL AFTER his execution the evidence was misinterpreted, and they concluded that none of the evidence used against Willingham was valid. The fire was accidental. Maybe if they would have looked harder into it they would have found out that fires are started accidentally all the time! Fires are started by cooking, the heater, washing machines and dryers, air conditioners and fans, candles, electrical equipment, if its fourth of July your fireworks can start a fire, Christmas trees, sometimes your cigarettes are not all the way out like you think they are and they can start the fire (most things in the world can). Look at your facts and look over the crime scene

Arson cases are hard to investigate sometimes. Sometimes things are too burnt down to figure out how a fire was started. In this case Joshua Powell burned down his home with his two sons inside of it. He had lost custody of his kids and was mentally unstable. Sine there was a CPS officer at the scene who witnessed the situation and smelled gas it will be an easy start for the arson investigators.

On August 30, 1979 there was a fire that killed two children and one adult at their residence. Investigators concluded that the fire was an arson. They concluded this because of the heavy alligator charring on the floor that was misinterpreted as arson. The investigators felt this was due to a pool of Stoddard solvent, a liquid flammable substance, used to start the fire. In reality these markings were due to radiation effect from the fire, not arson. On March 26, 1980 Louis DiNicola was charged with arson and three counts of murder. Louis spent four years in prison before being on bail while awaiting retrial. He was granted a new trial from his appeal of this conviction. The basis for the retrial was that evidence from the original

They found “pour patterns” in the home that indicated “a flammable or combustible liquid [had been] doused on [the] floor” and caused the “fire to concentrate,” “crazed glass” that had been cited in textbooks as being the result of a fire burning “fast and hot,” which also indicated a liquid accelerant, and “V” shaped soot marks that pointed to multiple origins and the fire having been “intentionally set by human hands.” They also cited the path of the fire—the “burn trailer”—being abnormal as it turned sharply toward the front door. Finally, a sample taken from the home revealed the presence of mineral spirits, “a substance that is often found in charcoal-lighter fluid,” near the front door. They concluded that the evidence simply didn’t match up with Willingham’s version of events. The remaining evidence came from witness testimony, such as an inmate in the same jail who “alleged that Willingham had confessed to him,” neighbors, firefighters, and police that were at the scene, and testimony from medical experts. Tim Gregory, a psychologist, and James Grigson, a forensic psychiatrist, testified that art possessed by Willingham (and his tattoos) suggested an “association… with cultive-type [and] satanic-type activities,” and that “Willingham was an ‘extremely severe sociopath’,”

In one out of five times is where they actually fine enough evidence to arrest the suspect that committed the crime. Arson investagors take a very long time to solve a case in order to gather enough evidence but most of the times they don’t find enough evidence to even find suspect. What are some errors arson investigators have made resulting in wrongful convictions? Include not only the errors, but which cases they took place in, and how wrongful thinking was applied. What do you think should be done to prevent these errors in the future? In this paper we are going to talk about the Willingham case, Lime Street Fire, and the Taylor case.

Despite believe that Fogg and Vasquez conducted their investigation the best they knew how and with integrity, I strongly believe they may have come to a different conclusion with more educational background in fires science. Gerald Hurst who is considered the godfather of modern fire investigation later provided an analysis of the evidence left behind by the fire, and came to a different conclusion than Fogg and

Immediately prior to the Twin River valet strike, David Demuth facilitated a petition that was posted on the wall at Twin River discouraging maintenance department members from voting to support the valet group. Maini called me up and I told him to remove Demuth from the maintenance department negotiating committee which he did and that is the basis for this charge. The case law is very clear and the decision involving Local 254 that the union needs to speak with one voice and can remove individuals from elected steward positions when it undermines the Union’s rule and that is exactly what Demuth did by posting this petition on the bulletin board that the Company knew that there was a rift in the Union.

Thousands of fires occur on a yearly basis throughout the United States. Whether it is forest fires, house fires, or any other event that involves uncontrollable flames, the outcome will always be the same; high amounts of destruction and physical damage. When fire emergencies occur, responding to the incident may not be much of a complication as apposed to determining the source from where the fire started or what triggered its behavior, which is truly the challenge. In order to do so, a fire investigator has to be present at the scene of the fire after it has been eliminated. The investigator, after reviewing any possible marks or behavior trails, will conclude if the incident was indeed an accident or intentional, thus making it an act

I certify that the work submitted for this assignment is my own. Where the work of others has been used to support my work then credit has been acknowledged.

My signature indicates that this document represents my own work. Excluding shared data, the information, thoughts and ideas are my own, except as indicated in the references. I have submitted an electronic copy through Balckboard to be scanned by TurnItIn.com. In addition, I have not given aid to another student on this assignment.

The assignment work submitted by my own and the sources which I used have been acknowledged in the reference list.