Death Penalty Is Morally Wrong

The death penalty has been considered one of the most severe punishments by governments. However, recently, many people have rebelled against the death penalty. The death penalty is an act that is similar to being ruled under fascism instead of democracy. Under the rule of democracy, citizens are responsible for the acts of other fellow citizens, which can be inferred that crime is caused by the lack of responsibility in society. The victim's loved ones suffer due to the victim's death. It is understandable that they would want the murderer dead, but society often does not work that way. People need to think on behalf of the society.

The death penalty how much does society really knows or understand about the process? Many people view the death penalty a justice “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.” They it is justice and feels safe because of the option of the death penalty; however, most do not really know much about the process of executing a death row inmate, how much more the death penalty cost comparing with keeping an inmate in prison for life without parole. The death penalty is unethical and waste of millions of dollars, because the death penalty is a very slow process, and waste of tax payers’ money.

Imagine Sierrah coming to court and hearing the judge say she is sentence to die. Imagine waking up every day in a cell waiting to die. There are no contact visits and she is in a cell 23 hours of the day by herself. She wait on death row for two decades until finally her day of execution comes. The guard comes up to cell twenty eight and says it’s time to go and takes her to the death house. She gets the last meal and says final goodbyes before being strapped to a gurney and asked to say her very last words. Family slowly watches her die and soon they take the body to prison cemetery. So, is the death penalty right for America? There have been people that were convicted of a crime they did not do. Innocent

Furthermore, the death penalty should be dismantled because research has shown that criminals have been wrongly convicted and sentenced to the death penalty when later evidence comes up that proves their innocence. To illustrate,

Sister Helen Prejean, the writer of the biographical account “Dead Men Walking”, advocates strongly for the abolition of the death penalty. The non-fiction work is based on her experience being the spiritual advisor of Sonnier and other inmates on death row. Prejean believes that if people know the truth about executions, they will oppose them. In her essay “Memoirs of a Dead Man Walking”, she openly opposes the death penalty. There are four reasons for her to oppose death penalty is immoral as. Firstly, it is a torture. Secondly,, it does not work out as a deterrent. Thirdly, and it costs more than life imprisonment. Finally, only the poor sentenced to death. She believes that the death penalty is immoral as it is a torture, it does not work out as a deterrent and it costs more than life imprisonment. However, I disagree with her argument, because death penalty is not seeing as a torture in history, Super Court and those criminals deserve the retribution; death penalty help deters crimes and poor cannot be the reason to escape the law.

The death penalty is a topic where many will come to a disagreement. In one hand, some may feel that it brings no closure to families of victims. In the other hand, there’s people who can testify to feeling or wanting to feel closure with the person who hurt their loved one dead. In some places, there’s evidence of the deterrent theory to be true and to not be true. Also, there’s facts that state that the death penalty violates human rights but at the same time, there’s facts that state that it saves lives. Lastly, there’s evidence that justice is and isn’t served when it comes down to the death penalty. There’s good and bad when it comes to the death penalty, closure or no closure, crime rates go lower or higher, and justice is either served

Since 1973, 153 people have been exonerated from death row. To exonerate means to take away from death row or to let the accused individual go. The death penalty should be abolished from all over the world once and for all for many reasons.

Murder is wrong. Ever since we were little kids we have been taught to not use violence because violence does not solve anything. Yet, it is okay and legal to murder someone for murdering another person. Today, people no longer think twice as death or violence being a horrible thing. Since it is portrayed in everyday life such as in movies or sports. The concept of human life has lost its meaning. The death penalty contributes to this problem. The death penalty has always been a controversial issue, but hopefully after my speech my points will be clear as to why the death penalty is wrong. College students should not believe it is ethical to take another persons through the death penalty, because it is inhumane, unnecessary, and selfish.

The death penalty should be illegal in the United States due to its complete lack of moral decency, financial benefit, and an increased number of systematic flaws. Using the death penalty shows human’s darkest side morally because they are consciously choosing to kill. Even while ignoring the moral implications of the death penalty, it is often not economically advantageous either. In addition, the system of capital punishment possesses mistakes caused by human error and lack of consideration for the class system. Ultimately, the death penalty causes more harm than benefits and is a flaw in our society.

Some people do not believe that capital punishment is morally wrong. They feel that it should be looked at as a logical case. They start with the practical plan that executing someone is a simple step, and then they start to argue that there is no positive result that would come out of the execution. To begin the thinking process of this point, the decision of what the capital punishment will actually accomplish. One possible outcome would be to stop others from committing similar crimes. Another possibility is punishment as a way of voicing the society’s anger that they have with the crime.

If you are accused of a serious crime that you did not commit, you could be executed. By having the death penalty, it does not give someone a second chance which goes against the Catholic faith, The Catholic faith policy is to forgive and forget, which the death penalty does not do. People have the right to correct or improve themselves because it gives them a second chance at a good life. Although the death penalty may keep criminals from committing more crimes, it has many drawbacks. Capital punishment is morally wrong and goes against the Constitution. It is also a mistake that cannot be changed.

The human mind is amazing, the things it can do and accomplish the emotions we feel, the way we think, and impulses that can drive us to do deadly things. The human mind in simple terms is phenomenal. After reading, re-reading, and evaluating your article we have come to the conclusion that the death penalty in morally wrong and psychologically these people, who are murdering and raping, are not right in the head. “In the 1990s a research team — led by Adrian Raine of the University of Southern California and Monte Buchsbaum…did brain scans on 25 convicted murderers” (Potter). In this study, they found that many of the killers had some sort of abnormalities in the front section of the brain called the frontal lobe. As they scanned the brains

Throughout history, the death penalty was a normal punishment for criminals. If the death penalty was not unethical in the past, then why should it be considered unethical in today’s society? “The use of bodies of the executed for human dissection is as old as the exploration for human anatomy itself” (Hildebrandt 6). “Bodies of the executed became a widely used source for dissection” (Hildebrandt 6). If people did not dissect the bodies of the executed, people would be unable to learn about the human body. If the death penalty did not exist in the past, our knowledge of human anatomy would have been limited.

When watching the news on television or reading the newspaper, communities are bombarded with reports of murder, shootings, rape, and other heinous crimes. Unfortunately, it is almost unheard of for a day to go by and not hear of these tragedies. If the police are able to make an arrest, the suspects are put through a process for conviction. At the end of the trial, the jury makes a verdict deciding if the prosecuted is innocent or guilty. If found guilty and the crime committed consists of murder, kidnapping, treason, or aircraft hijacking, the sentencing could result in the death penalty. Currently, the world is in a very widespread debate regarding the death penalty and whether it is ethically right or wrong. The death penalty is the

It is nearly certain that in today’s society, extremely violent crimes occur and it is up to the people to decide which kinds of crimes deserve a stiffer punishment than others. The question of the death penalty being a morally permissible sentence in the case of homicides, such as murder or manslaughter, is a current controversial topic, and is also a contemporary moral issue. This idea has been practiced throughout history for thousands of years and is currently used today as a means of justice. It is handed to those who have been found guilty of a capital crime. It is considered to be taking ‘an eye for an eye’. Due to this increase in crime rate, the proposal of capital punishment has emerged in today’s society. Thirty one states have