Designer Babies Research Paper

A designer baby is genetically engineered baby. In other words designer baby is an edited human examples are parents’ choice of eye color, skin color the child being smart or active. The first designer baby was created in the year 2000. A designer baby can also not contract diseases you can genetically make the baby be immune to a family disease or any certain diseases. What are the benefits of having a designer baby?

Picture a young couple in a waiting room looking through a catalogue together. This catalogue is a little different from what you might expect. In this catalogue, specific traits for babies are being sold to couples to help them create the "perfect baby." This may seem like a bizarre scenario, but it may not be too far off in the future. Designing babies using genetic enhancement is an issue that is gaining more and more attention in the news. This controversial issue, once thought to be only possible in the realm of science-fiction, is causing people to discuss the moral issues surrounding genetic enhancement and germ line engineering. Though genetic research can prove beneficial to learning how to prevent hereditary

What if there was a future where having a child was as simple as selecting desirable genes out of a catalogue? A future where technology granted parents the ability to design and perfect their children. The notion of “Designer Babies” seems absurd; however the rapid development of technology and the potential of gene manipulation could make this a startling reality.

The escalating supremacy and receptiveness of genetic technology to engineer and "design babies," now gives parents the option to modify their unborn children, consecutively to prevent their offspring's from receiving genetic disorders such as: "sickle cell diseases, cystic fibrosis and down syndrome ," or conceivably, make them blue eye coloured, intelligent or else blessed with enviable qualities. Would this mean there will be an increase in the superiority among the rich, both physically and mentally, or will this modification be available for all to exploit, or would we be evidencing engineered babies facing unexpected genetic predicament? The highly contentious issue of designing unborn children to be a perfect "epitome" is thoroughly investigated and examined in the article of, lead author of

Notwithstanding, designer babies are seen as the potential cause of “classes” between society. It is argued that since designer babies would be better looking and more intellectual than “non-designer” babies. The article states, “[The process] could cause the “non-designer” children to miss opportunities because jobs among other things are more likely to take the “optimum” candidate for something.” It is also suggested that not everyone would be able to afford this process, making it even more inequitable. Nevertheless, these problems could create positive energy. This could give non-designer children the motivation to work harder for the jobs that they want. This could help to advance human intelligence in the long run as well as advance

The possibility of making a designer baby could be happening soon. It is no longer an issue of whether it will happen; the question is when will it happen. Today researchers are making fast advances in information on the human genome and how to change and adjust genes. Utilizing pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), parents can choose particular developing embryos to guarantee a specific sex or to prevent a disease. Nevertheless, this innovation may be utilized to choose eye color or even the intelligence of a child. People should not be allowed to design their babies because it is not morally correct, it could create discrimination against the disabled, and it could affect the child 's mental well-being.

The article “Ethics of Designer Babies” by Sarah Ly Keywords addresses a variety of perspectives regarding the controversy if designing your baby with your own characteristic s desired and a less percent of giving them any disease is a ethical or unethical problem for society. In the first place, this article explains the specific definition of designer babies. Designer  babies are a babies whose genetic makeup has been artificially selected by genetic engineering combined with in vitro fertilization to ensure the presence or absence of particular genes or characteristics. Vitro fertilization begins with an embryo DNA being modified and then introduce in the womb.

Even though there are several advantages of designer babies, this technology also brings some negative consequences for humans at the same time. First of all, the safety concerns, much like we saw with early recombinant DNA research include both potential dangers to the offspring of patients treated and to the environment(Shapiro). As this technology has not developed completely, it may cause the termination of women’s embryos and damage gene pool(Designer babies). Second, for the moral concerns, children whose genes are modified may live in a priority group, which could create a social gap or inequality in society. Based on the differences in abilities and intelligence, opportunities will spread unevenly. Furthermore, designer babies may result in gender unbalance and increase gender inequality because some parents hold desires of having a child of a particular sex. According to some statistics, the male to female ratio is already nearly 1.2 in China and some parts of India. In 1990, there were 100 million women “missing” as a result of various forms of discrimination(Savulescu). Moreover, the creation of designer babies allow the gaps of economic status to increase. Since the process of designer babies requires developed

Foremost, the rich can get designer babies way easier than the lower classes are able to have, but at least we can have numerous experiments. For example, in the article,

Science is now able to better improve human health and safety thanks to the advanced modern technology and medicine that are available. Yet with today's technology being implemented into science comes the questions of human morality, or bioethics. One of the bioethics debates is on the coined term “Designer babies”; on if or where society should draw the line on genetically altering our children before they are born. With the technology able to stop hereditary diseases, the scientific development’s are able to change the child’s “eye color, hair color, social intelligence, right down to whether or not your child would have a widow’s peak” before the child is born. From the options on choosing whether or not your child will look or act a certain

Parents are given the option to modify their baby’s genes through the technique of designer babies. However, there are ethical concerns about whether the practice of designer babies will be used for the intended purpose. Since the parents are the ones deciding their baby’s genes, they are able to choose according to their preferences. Therefore, it gives parents the option to decide their babies’ appearance and personality. Thus, it leads to the controversial aspect of gender selection through the technology of designer baby as “the sex of a child at birth can be prearranged by choosing embryos for a specific sexual trait” (Verlinsky, 2005, p. 24). Parents can now easily select the sex of their baby through this technology. In addition, parents’

It is right to choose the features of the baby because it prevents future diseases, reduces the risk of babies with serious disorders like cancer. Designer babies carry genes that their parents may not keep, this means that the new genes that are desired will now be in the family gene pool. Furthermore, designer babies can get rid of the gene for a past family disease or disorder. The positive impact is that ‘designer babies’ allow parents to give their child a healthy life because parents would not pick the characteristics and features that will make their baby unhealthy. Designer babies will give the parents the opportunity to create their ‘perfect’ child. For instance, parents can choose for their baby to have red hair, blue eyes, gender

As of now, the world is standing on the verge of one of the most consequential technological thresholds in history, a scientific discovery that has the power to alter the very fabric of the lives of generations to come, challenging what it means to be human. Imagine a world in which one can look through a catalog of possible traits while shopping for a new child, picking hair color, intelligence level, and athletic ability. However crazy this may seem, “designer baby” is no longer a science-fiction term, but an expression that has now found its way into even the dictionary. A designer baby is defined as “a baby whose genetic makeup has been selected in order to eradicate a particular defect, or ensure that a particular gene is present.” Currently, there are multiple functioning methods in which a scientist can genetically design an unborn child. For example, in a process of Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD), the most common process of genetic engineering, geneticists are able to screen the cells of the embryo for the specific disorders, as well as characteristics, only implanting those that possess the desired traits--effectively opening the door to the questionable genetic shaping of future offspring. Manipulating a baby’s genetic traits undermines humanity, for it fosters drastic inequality, disfigures the parent child relationship, and destroys the appreciation of the giftedness of human life.

It is commonly known that beautiful people are listened to. For this reason, parents want attractive newborns; they not only want to change their appearance, they want to choose their gender, personality, and intelligence among other things. One critic argues “that the “dominant view of liberty reserves most of its protection only for the most privileged members of society” (Darnovsky), imagine a world with a new elite social class. Designer Babies will not only be genetically enhanced, but they will also be wealthy because only an economically stable family can afford the techniques used; everyone else will be left scrambling to catch up. However, no one cares about all the fallout that will occur; they only want the best, brightest, and biggest to show that they are capable, worthy. For example, if we think about the extreme, then these modified humans may start to push “normal” humans out of jobs, whereas Designer Babies are specifically designed to have certain traits to excel in particular professions. Not to mention, a new form of racism will eventually unfold since people tend to shun things they find wrong, whether it be the “superior” Designer Babies for having more advantages or the “pure” humans for being subpar. As Heather Long eloquently states, “People do bizarre things to obtain a certain look, even if the most of us would say it’s gross.” This statement is exceedingly true; people are always running head first into the unknown to attain something that is

Should parent be allowed to genetically engineer their children? : The ethical dilemma of designer babies.