Deviance In Workplace

There are many theories that contribute to what may cause Juvenile Delinquency, one of which is called Social Learning Theory. Social Learning Theory states that behavior is modeled through observation, either directly through intimate contact with others or indirectly through media. Social learning theorist Albert Bandura, Walter Mischel, and Richard Walters indicate that children model their behavior according to the reactions they receive from others, the behavior of their parents, and the behavior they view through media.

An additional dreadful, rude, disturbing experience that I frequently encounter because of this force and their perverse doctrine is my frequently dismissals from local stores. Once more you perhaps are pondering thinking What! How and what exactly entails your experience of being thrown out of stores. Precisely yet again let me recall tpo your attention that this force at all times claim that every occurence that transpires is associated with some propose, growth or fruit. However once more that as well is completely false their initial, primary intent is to disarm, control and ultimately ruins one day by causing anger, disappointment. Thus when I go into many stores they at all times are attempting to see how they can disarm and cause anger

The Office is a comedic mockumentary that takes place in Scranton, Pennsylvania and focuses on the lives of Dunder Mifflin Paper Company Inc. employees over the course of nine years. It has many characters, but mainly centers around Michael Scott, the regional manager, Dwight Schrute, Jim Halpert (both salesman) and Pam Beesly, the receptionist. Over its nine seasons, the show has displayed many sociological concepts, but has the most examples of deviance, sex and gender, socialization and social interaction and groups and organization. Deviance in The Office is displayed mainly through one of its minor characters, Creed Bratton.

Generally, families are considered to be the primary factors in socialization. The impact of family in juvenile delinquency has been theorized and investigated for many decades being that crime commonly runs in families. Parental criminality is one of the most vigorous and most consistent conjectures of a child's delinquency (Greene & Gabbidon, 2009, p. 281).

Who you socialize with tends to determine whether or not you will participate in antisocial behaviors and/or delinquency. Youth tend to follow and repeat deviant activities their friends are taking part in such as consuming marijuana and/or alcohol. Siegel and Welsh (2015) found

Individuals with strong and stable attachments to others within society, such as family, friends and community institutions are presumed to be less likely to violate social norms, because such behaviour would distress these respective attachments (Reginald et al, 1995). Second, is commitment, meaning having an individual investment in social activities. For example, an individual who has invested time, energy and resources into conforming to social norms, such as educational and career goals, is less likely to become involved in a gang (Goodwill 2009). In particular, since they have invested heavily in conforming these individuals have more to lose than those who have not invested in their future in a conforming fashion. (Reginald et al, 1995). Third, is involvement, which Hirschi utilized in order to illustrate that when large amounts of structured time are invested in socially approved activities, such as sports or work, the time for available deviance is drastically reduced (Reginald et al, 1995). Specifically, active engagement in conventional endeavors acts as a powerful protective factor against delinquency (Huebner and Betts, 2002). Hirschi’s final element of social bonding is belief. This pertains to an actor’s level of belief in the moral validity of shared social values and norms (Reginald et al, 1995). When an individual strongly believes in the conventional norms they are less likely to deviate from

2 of Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior: Exhibit 2.5, 2.6, and 2.7 MGT 312 WEEK 2 Personality Impact Paper

This is one of the more obvious factors in criminal behavior. For example, a child growing up surrounded by a family with a criminal past is more likely to fall into the same tendencies than a child growing up around a family with no criminal past. The final factor of the sociological theory is peers. Peers can fall under the same category as family in a way that who an individual is exposed to in the developmental stages of childhood directly reflects on how an individual will be. Furthermore, children are extremely vulnerable to influences at young ages and when surrounded by peers with criminal backgrounds they are susceptible to fall into the same patterns.

There is not one specific response on why the juveniles resort to criminal behavior, but there are abundance amounts of biological, sociological and psychological theories that can help obtain rationales and comprehension to better comprehend thee juveniles. All of these circumstances contribute a massive role in the way adolescents view their lives and help them turn to lawbreaking behavior. Once these theories have been cautiously studied and critiqued, administering them to our juveniles in an individualized situation can help discourage and persist in these children from selecting a life of criminal behavior and abnormality. Considering the brief review of social learning hypothesis as depicted before, the focal suspicion and suggestion of social learning theory can be best compressed in the two after explanations: juveniles misbehave when they have a disorderly family life and when children hang around the same crowd that are not beneficial in their childhood development. It merits accentuating that social learning hypothesis is a general hypothesis in that it offers a clarification for why people first take an interest in wrongdoing and aberrance, why they keep on culpable, why they heighten and deescalate, why they practice and sum up, and why they cease from criminal and degenerate

I have found another trigger for my deviant behavior: peer pressure. Peer influence has emerged over the last fifty years to be the chief source of values and behavioral influence in adolescence, replacing the influence of adults. Although the level of deviance from peer group to peer group varies, the negative actions of one member in a group will increase the probability of other members taking part in similar behaviors. Affiliation with deviant peers predicts delinquent behavior more strongly than community, school, or family.

further question of why it is that the frequency of deviant behavior varies within different social structure and how it happens that the deviations have different shapes and pattern in different social structures. (230)

Although both articles tested deviant behavior through a number of theories, Social Learning theory came out on top for both studies. The first article on cocaine use among adolescents displayed a stronger correlation between Social Learning theory than Self-Control theory. The same applies to the second article on vicarious peer victimization in which three different theories were analyzed. Social Learning theory displayed a higher correlation between peer victimization and violent behavior. The results from both articles display supporting data for the effectiveness of Social Learning theory. This evidence however, like stated in both articles, is limited to the boundaries of their experiment. Each test had unique variables specific to that test such as setting, people, and environments, this means these results cannot speak for all conditions. In future experiments, there should be a wider range of variables within the experiment. Most of the tests were conducted in rural areas, there should be a variety of locations and environments in order to be more inclusive. Despite these issues the articles are supportive of the efficiency of Social Learning

David O. Friedrichs provided more accurate definition of occupational deviance because the term seems to be applied to activities drifted away from the original meaning of White Collar crime. It’s blended with the term conventional crime. Edwin Sutherland introduced the concept of white-collar crime in 1939. There were conceptual confusions with the term occupational crime, occupational deviance, and workplace crime because these terms are combined with white-collar crime. Friedrichs (2002) defined occupational deviances as “characterized as activity undertaken for one’s own gain, or to cope with workplace stress, and not for the benefit of one’s employer or organization” (p.249).

Another factor that can influence crime is socialization, which is the process of learning how to properly behave. If someone grew up having a distant relationship with their parents, they might be more likely to commit a crime. A parent is a child’s first and best teacher. A good parent should teach their child right

Employees are said to depict positive behaviors like innovative behavior and OCB when the individuals feel the support of the organization, i.e., perceived organizational support (POS) and negative behaviors like CWB in a non-supportive organization (Scheuer, 2010). From this perspective the workplace deviance can be triggered with respect to the unfavorable or unsupportive working conditions. (Colbert, Mount, Harter, Barrick, & Witt, 2004). Thus this leads to the organizational context that has to be taken into account in deviance research (Bennett, Aquino, Reed & Thau, 2005). Even leader behaviors are said to influence the perception of the organizational climate (Lewin, Lippitt & White, 1939). Effectiveness within the organization builds up a trusting relationship between the leader and the sub-ordinates that will have positive consequences. When the employee perception of organization related factors are taken into account organizational injustice has been a frequently cited cause of misconduct.