Dicristina discusses the relationship between sympathy, the victim, and the criminal. He states that we ‘Naturally feel more sympathy for the victim than the offender.’ Despite this instinct, this does not mean we cannot feel sympathy for the criminal at all. As we have seen, through both novels sympathy has been successfully induced for the offenders. Dicristina also discusses the idea that as sympathy for the victim grows, punishment for the criminal become more severe. He doesn’t however, discuss this in terms of criminal sympathy. It would, therefore, be rational to assume that as sympathy for the offender grows, opinion of how severe the punishment should be for them decreases. The specific information that’s included in novels can be …show more content…
Foucault discusses how the criminal benefits from ‘a spontaneous wave of sympathy: ‘His acts of violence were seen as descending directly from old struggles.’ Capote frequently uses this feature and includes Perry’s disturbed childhood to conjure sympathy for him. To give just one example, he includes eight pages of psychiatric analysis that blame his problems on his childhood environment. He does this less so for Dick, but as we already have seen, Capote pays a lot more attention to Perry than anyone else. This feature is also seen in Helter Skelter with an inclusion of a detailed description of Manson’s deviant past. To a certain extent, this works for conjuring sympathy for Manson. However, when coupled with the bias prosecuting narration, the sympathy seems to become less …show more content…
It has also discovered that how that sympathy is narrated, can play an extensive part in the reader’s judgment of the criminal. I’ve shown through Capote, that bias narration is a useful tool in causing readers to feel sympathy for the offender. In addition to this, using other offenders as an antithesis can also be a huge aid when trying to evoke criminal sympathy. Despite this, the inclusion of factual elements in the narrative is also a useful device in sympathy evocation. This is arguably a better way of doing so as readers are much more likely to have faith in a factual narration as opposed to a biased one. Despite this, Capote still manages to evoke more sympathy for Perry than Dick in In Cold Blood. This would seemingly be simply down to the sheer difference in pages spent discussing each convict in the novel. The amount spent on the psychiatric analysis of the two is a good example of this. Capote spends eight pages giving evidence for Perry and only three for
Throughout In Cold Blood Capote goes through the lives of the killers, Dick and Perry. Both convicts released from jail and at first glance seem to have a lot in common, but as the book continues the reader can see that the two characters are in fact very different. To characterize the killers Capote frequently uses flashbacks into their pasts, giving the reader a sense of what their lives were like and why they became who they are. Capote also utilizes detailed descriptions of the men’s appearances, quirks, and habits to characterize the murderers.
Besides using anecdotes and stories from his childhood, Capote also used analogies to invoke a sense of sympathy for Perry, thus further using the means of pathos. In specific, a constant ‘comparison’ or analogy coupled with Perry is typically his ‘childish’ like structure. Short legs, small feet. This analogy is used constantly, including the hanging scene, where it is said Dewey had “open his eyes [and] saw the same childish feet, tilted, dangling”(Capote 341). This comparison is seen often when describing Perry and seems to give the man a childlike presence, making him come across as more innocent and understandable. This connection to Perry takes away from the ‘severity’ of his actions and instead reminds readers of his childhood and how it has affected him all through life. Using pathos to soften the personality of a killer and bring to life his struggles helped Capote to better exemplify the ‘makings’ of a murderer. When creating this book, Capote wanted to analyze how a murder came to be and thus how a murderer came to exist - in particular, Perry. The use of pathos in correlation to one of the main characters helped break down the hostile killer into a damaged, young, sensible young man who simply had a tough go at life. The device allowed for connection and personalization.
In “Serial” Sarah Koenig researches the murder of Hae Min lee. The main person she interviews is the one convicted of the murder Hae’s ex-boyfriend Adnan. Sarah Koenig when interviewing Adnan she gets too close to him, for she thinks he is innocent. Sarah Koenig makes you see that Adnan might have not killed Hae Min Lee. Truman Capote does the same as Sarah Koenig also gets to close to one of the killers of the Clutter family Perry. Capote got close to perry and felt sorry for him hearing his story, so in his book “In Cold Blood” he make you feel sympathy for Perry trying to convince you why he did what he did. Both authors got involved, but Truman Capote was the most affected of the two because him and Perry became good
Although Dick and Perry may both be killers, Capote uses language to portray Perry as a victim of Dick;therefore, Perry is seen through the eyes of the reader as an innocent man who was simply taken advantage of and molded into a killer by Dick.
Following the emotionally ‘flat’ perspective by Dick, is Perry’s self-pity attitude during his own chapter. Perry knows the annoyance of his voice to Dick, but has no control over his actions. With only having one thought repeated indefinitely, “I think there must be something wrong with us” (capote 30), one would need to vent in some manner. To continue, Perry’s pity persona even has the author himself take pity on him: “Look at his family!” (Capote 30). Capote demands the reader to acknowledge Perry’s grim adolescence and suicidal family: “His mother, an alcoholic, had strangled to death on her own vomit...Fern...jumped out a window...Jimmy...had one day driven his wife to suicide and killed himself the next” (Capote 30). Capote pities Perry and portrays him as human, instead of the monster everyone believes him to be. Capote explains how Perry’s mental state and upcoming is the reason he is mentally unstable. Capote exposes not all criminals are monsters. Referring back to Dick’s passage, Dick claims “Perry could be “such a kid,” always wetting the bed and crying in his sleep” (Capote 29). Perry never matured from his depressing childhood, and he remained a in this state into adulthood. Returning to Perry’s
Does a man who brutally murdered four humans-for the sole reason that he had the power to-deserve any ounce of sympathy? “In Cold Blood”, Truman Capote uses “pathos” to appeal to the emotions of the readers about the two murderers, Perry Smith and Richard Hickock. Capote certainly sympathizes with one more than the other. He portrays one of the cold-blooded murderers in a positive light, but portrays the other murderer as a despicable and disgusting human being. For instance, Capote utilizes righteous and simple diction to advocate Perry’s emphatic nature with choices like, “compassion” and “uncharitable”. Furthermore, the author’s piteous tone emphasizes the tragic and hopelessness of Perry’s life with choices like, “You think I like myself?”(Capote 185) and “...the Black Widows were always at me. Hitting me”(Capote 132). In addition, Capote’s tone and diction paint Dick as a tasteless, vicious creature who deserved to take the full blame of the murder. Lastly, there are several rhetorical strategies that author employs to encourage the audience to empathize with Perry and to hate and despise Dick. Primarily, diction is one of the most persuasive literary device in the novel.
The most dominant strategy that Capote utilizes in order to achieve his purpose is pathos, as he plays on our emotions to get us to feel true sympathy for Perry Smith. This is strategy is overall the most effective one because it allows the viewers to perceive Perry differently. Capote mentions Perry’s abusive and neglectful childhood several times throughout the story’s course in order to make the readers feel empathic, and pitiful towards him. In one instance of the novel, Capote makes out Perry as a hero in a way. He sets up a picture of the killers at the beach, and he mentions how uncomfortable Perry is when he sees Dick talking to a young girl. He describes another instance like this when he says, “Hadn’t they almost got in a fight when quite recently he had prevented Dick from raping a terrified girl” (Capote 202). Perry is willing to stand up to his partner when he comes to situations like this. Readers can’t help but view Perry as a hero in his own way as he protects the young girls from Dick’s pedophilic mind. Capote plays on the assumption that everyone hates child predators, which is almost always true. In a way, Capote makes us feel admiration for Perry’s heroic effort in protecting the innocent, as he “prevented Dick” from doing something horrible. As Perry confesses his crime to Dewey and Duntz, he admits, “But I hoped we could do it without violence” (234). This is one of several moments where the readers get a sense of reluctance from Perry to commit the crime. Although Perry did eventually
Capote expresses his idea of nature vs. nurture in Dick Hickock and Perry Smith and whether killers are born or made. With this in mind, he writes, “Dick became convinced that Perry was a rarity, ‘a natural born killer,’— absolutely sane but conscienceless, and capable of dealing with or without motive, the coldest-blooded deathblows” (205). This makes apparent Perry’s instincts to kill and Dick’s desire to manipulate Perry’s instincts to do so. Dick uses Perry as an image of who he wants to be, even though Perry feels shame and embarrassment. Capote inspects their motivations for the killings based on their backgrounds.
The best novels are the ones that connects with the reader and just toys with their emotions, as if they too were also in the story by using pathos, the most powerful appeal. This holds true with Truman Capote’s, In Cold Blood and his writing appealing to the reader’s emotions in the portrayal of Perry Edward Smith and Richard “Dick” Eugene Hickock, the two murders with an addition of Capote showing a great deal of favoritism to Perry over Dick. Throughout the novel, Capote uses tone and diction to allure the reader into the novel’s world and into every character’s life, just as if we knew their whole backstory.
Diction supports Capote’s purpose because he uses it to vividly describe the murderers. His diction also shows readers how complex their minds really are and how Perry is really just an ordinary human. As readers meet the murderers, Capote describes Perry as such, “His tiny feet, encased in short black boots with steel buckles, would have neatly fitted into a delicate lady’s dancing slippers; when he stood up, he was no taller than a twelve-year-old child, and suddenly looked, strutting on stunted legs that seemed grotesquely inadequate to the grown-up bulk they supported, not like a well-built truck driver but like a retired jockey, overblown, and muscle bound,” (Capote 15). Capote describes Perry as “no taller than a twelve-year-old” which indicates how he is not some big, dangerous man who murders on the daily. His word choice of “grotesquely inadequate” also connotes how Perry is not strong and can barely support his weight. This makes readers feel sympathy for Perry, which therefore humanizes Perry as not a criminal. Capote also writes how he is more like a “retired jockey” which denotes how he is just a normal guy who has been through life just like anyone else. The word choice makes readers believe Perry is just like anyone else, a normal human being with faults. A second effect of diction is when Capote includes Dr. Jones’ diction to emphasize how Perry’s criminal mind thinks. As Dr. Jones is describing Perry’s mental state he says, “ More extensive evaluation would be necessary to make an exact psychiatric diagnosis, but his presence personality structure is very nearly that of a paranoid schizophrenic reaction,” (Capote 298). Capote
These emotions could go one of two ways- the first would be to feel pity for his parents, while seeing Dick in a slightly more pitiful light, rather than not even seeing him as human. Or it go go the second way, you feel pity for his parents, and begin to hate Dick even more for, not only what he did to the Clutter family, but also what he did to his parents. He not only ruined the Clutter family’s lives, he also ruined his life, his parents’ life, and even Perry’s life, even though he willingly participated in the murder. Capote’s use of pathos really humanizes the Clutter family murders, but also makes them more pitiful. They had a chance at a good life, Dick’s father even said that he used to be a good kid, but they threw it all away, robbing and killing an innocent family. Capote does a very good job of depicting Dick and Perry, creating a good balance between despicable and pitiful, while sharing their side of the story in a very accurate, yet interesting, way.
Guilt is a central theme that makes us feel vulnerable and makes us mistrust the society we live in. He develops his claim with vulnerability in paragraph 5. He says “…most of us see ourselves as powerless cogs in a greater machine…”. He explains that people these days see themselves as unworthy and insignificant and because of this some people are pushed to read crime stories, People’s vulnerability comes from feeling insignificant and interplays with our guilt which causes our interest in crime fiction. Finally, Mosley develops his claim by showing our fascination with stories of crime in paragraph 13. He says “…they can offer escape through a fantasy where even a common everyday Joe (or Jane) can be saved.” This shows that people mainly look for crime fiction in order to escape from reality and the problems they’re facing in their daily lives. Without crime stories we wouldn’t be able to explore our own guilt.
Sympathy, another theme in this book, can have the same amount of impact on an individual. Instead of it having a negative reaction to the reader it has a superior reaction to the reader. ?Lee Chong? knew he could not have helped it, but he wished he might have known and perhaps tried to help. It was deeply a part of Lee?s kindness and understanding that man?s right to kill himself is inviolable, but sometimes a friend can make it unnecessary?(Page 2). Lee was having compassionate sentiments for the man who committed suicide. He had a deep feeling that he could of helped in someway to convince the man that his life was worth living. A side story that was important to the theme of Sympathy was a story about Mrs. Kitty Casini a mouse and Mary Talbot ?Kitty Casini had a mouse?Daintily she stabbed the mouse through the back and drew it wriggling to her and her tail flicked with tense delight? ?I can?t blame Kitty Casini? said Mary. ?I?m just not going to like her no matter how much I want to??(Pages 155-156). Mary had intense sympathy for that mouse that with no doubt died a tragic death. She went to the extreme of disliking on of her favorite cat. Sympathy can bring about the good in people. Sympathy for loved ones or strangers can surprise one for their intense emotions.
By using this example, Capote is able to strengthen his argument by implicitly claiming Perry was made to be a murderer because environment shapes person’s nature especially when they are young; therefore, it evokes feelings of pity within readers toward Perry’s criminal record. It seems that his criminal record was an extension of godforsaken environments which he had to grow up. Furthermore, Capote shows Perry’s internal emotion he was murdering the Clutter family. “I didn’t want to harm the man. I thought he was a very nice gentleman.
The description of Perry was extremely detailed and focused on his physical body, while the short description of Dick only said a few things about his personality. It appears that Capote wanted to explain more about Perry and find something common about him to relate and sympathize him.