Differences Between The Movie 'Ben-Hur'

     First off, the biggest difference is the time periods of each movie. The older movie was set in Early Renaissance times. The newer movie is set in the early ninety’s. Another difference is the use of special effects. In the

I personally liked the movie better because i like adventurous movies and i like to see what others have to go through to get to where they wanna be. It was super interesting seeing how badly Odysseus fought and went through so much just so he could get home to his family. I also liked watching the movie more because i have to see things visually to understand what's actually going on. One of the best scenes would be the

differences exist between the original play and the film. Apart from the specific techniques of lighting and

William Wyler directed a 1958 American epic historical drama film, Ben-Hur. This film is well known to be one of the greatest film scores reflecting in the classic traditions. The film portrays lives of two men (i.e., Jesus Christ and Judah Beh-Hur), in which the plot illustrates number of parallels and reversals. Rozsa utilizes modal harmonies and parallel chords to deploy the spirit of the Roman era. Throughout the film, he embraces traditional love themes

I was lucky enough to be able to view the film two weeks before its release, and I can tell you first hand that there are a great amount of changes to the movie. I think that some of these changes positively affected the quality of the movie, whereas other changes affected the movie in a negative way. I also think that some of these changes did not aid in expressing the important message of the story, which is that freedom of choice is important, and we shouldn't take it for granted.

One of the most notable differences between the play and movie is the way the characters developed. Miller and Hytner portray many of the characters and their roles differently. For example, Abigail, her character was so different from the movie and the play. In the play, Abigail was a liar, and when confronted by the Reverend Parris about her actions in the woods, lied to him. Her bad reputation is not shown in the movie. In the

He is mainly added for comic relief. The differences not only change the story’s plot in some way, but also

Another interesting difference of the movie and the Bible were the miracles shown in the Book of Exodus. In the Bible, Moses uses a staff to perform the miracles God asks him to do. He even turns the staff into a snake. However, in the movie, he uses a sword to part the Red Sea. In the Bible, God orders Moses to go to the bank of the Nile and use his staff to stretch it out for the rivers and all the reservoirs of water to turn into blood.

A contrast in the movies is the acting. In the original movie the actors weren't so believable because they seemed too exaggerated and kind of goofy at some points. For example, Sylvia would scream hysterically for anything that was slightly scary. However, the actors in the remake were much more realistic, and I think they did a better job of showing their emotion through their facial expressions without seeming overly dramatic. The sets in both films resemble each other because many of the settings were the same.

The “actors”who played “the different roles” weren't the same. The music they “used” is different too. T they would put Jay- Z and Rihanna in the new version of the movie. In the 1920’s that time of the year, the singers didn’t even exist. That makes it less accurate tot eh time period. The film from of 2013 was very similar to the book. butOne of the few the only differences was that Nick was in a mental hospital telling the story to his psychiatrist. Iand in the book, Nnick tells the story while living it with his friends and family. What Ii didn't like about the new version of the movie, was the music they played in the movie. I actually think it was better how they told the story in the film of 2013 though. I liked the fact that Nick was telling the story as he was writing the book. Iin my opinion it was the better

The biggest impact that the time of the film is the settings. The 1990 version is set in Denmark whereas the 1996 is set in New York City. This changes many things about the movies. In the old version there are castles, dungeons, and old looking architects.

One of the differences I could find was Helen's age. IN the play she was six and in the movie she was 11. It would be more acceptable to allow someone who is six to have a tantrum and it would be easier to teach someone earlier rather than later. James age was also different in the movie from the play. In the play he was 10 and in the movie he was around 16.

How Is The Character Different At The End Of The Movie From When The Movie Began?

Ben Hur Movie Comparison The two movies are both called Ben Hur, the first was produced in 1959. Directed by William Wyler and cinematography by Robert Surtees. The actor for Judah Ben Hur in this movie was Charlton Heston, the actor for Messalla was Stephen Boyd. The remade movie, made in 2016, was directed by Timur Bekmambetov and cinematography by Oliver Wood.

The movie, Ben-Hur is a classical world film that represents the ancient Roman civilization. The film was directed by William Wyler as an epic historical drama movie in 1959. The main cast features Charlton Heston who plays the role of Judah Ben-Hur, Stephen Boyd as Messala, Jack Hawkins as Quintus Arrius, Haya Harareet as Esther and Hugh Griffith as Sheik Ilderim (Wallace 5).