Digital Security In America Essay

The increasing power and functionality of technology has increasingly invaded privacy and complicated security. Technology has made it possible for the government to

“More than three billion people worldwide now use the internet (Time), and 80 percent of them access if from their smartphones” (Smart Insights). A smartphone is a mobile phone that performs many of the functions of a computer, typically having a touchscreen interface, and much more. There is an abundant amount of smartphone brands out there in the world and while they all cost different prices, they all perform the same job. Each person uses their smartphone for various reasons, whether it’s for work or to make calls or texts. Smartphones have changed society in various ways, both good and bad. Although countless individuals think that smartphones have ruined American society, smartphones have actually benefited society because of more safety precautions, information on hand, and entertainment.

However state and federal judges across the country have made conflicting rulings on what standards are required for the government to obtain tracking information from cell phone companies. Then there should a be law that the government should need a warrant to access your cellphones records and obtain data from the cell phone proproviders.The federal government's position is that it should be able to get most of this data if it decides it is relevant to an investigation, with no need for a search warrant. But then where does our privacy stops how would we know we're safe and our personal business is not out

The integrity of one’s communications and privacy of online activities is the largest casualty of the National Security Agency’s (NSA) surveillance over digital lives. Years since September 11, 2009, the NSA’s mass surveillance has greatly expanded due to the heightened concern that new technology can be used by terrorists to plan and execute a terrorist attack. In today’s age of technology, there are easier ways of accessing information and communication as well as new ways of hacking and gathering personal information. The new surveillance programs and regulations are enabled by the Patriot Act and post 9/11 paranoia, but it has been over fourteen years since the incident. After whistleblower, Edward Snowden, it was revealed that the government’s mass surveillance went beyond what many considered acceptable. It can be predicted that unless the U.S Government reins in NSA mass surveillance, the

Almost a quarter of all the parents that give their kids’ phones tracks their every move on the

Since September 11th, due to the use of powerful cryptography to hide the planning the terrorist actions, America has dropped its views of privacy technology as a defense against an intrusive government.  Instead, it appears that all of American society is now ready to allow many infringements of civil liberties in order to create a false sense of security.

People nowadays are uncomfortable with the Patriot Act because it collects so much data about people, and people worry about what happens with their data. The act was first established to catch threats to the public, but people question that the act may be over-stepping its boundaries (National Security, 1874). At a recent symposium at Loyola University Chicago, many discussions occurred about the safety of people’s data and how it was being used. The overall consensus is that the public does not like their data being unsecured and open to hackers. The Bell Telephone Company had access to many conversations and spied on suspicious ones. In our opinion, we prefer that companies and the government not keep our data for surveillance, but this is a hotly contested issue that will be argued for decades to

Originally, these devices were solely used for contacting family and friends or even business, but now they have turned into something much bigger. In the article “That’s No Phone. That’s My Tracker.”, Maass and Rajagopalan explain that our cell phones can track everything from what we buy to where we are at all times. Just like in 1984, we the government has complete knowledge of where we are and what we are doing because of the increasing use of technology in our society.

Digital privacy concerns, which have been a major issue in our country since 2001, increasingly violate our basic human rights as global citizens. The growing amount of government surveillance has manifested in the enactment of acts such as SOPA and CISPA. Although their intent on stopping digital piracy and attacks were clear, both were immediately met with harsh criticism; they allowed big corporations to violate our privacy rights by sharing our personal information with both other companies and the government. Our President, although publicly expressing his acknowledgement of the issue, failed to discuss an array of other pressing dilemmas regulated by the recently exposed National Security Agency (NSA), especially those involving

At the same time, in light of information leaked by Edward Snowden [4], privacy and protection of civil liberties has become a hot topic. It stands to reason that any security or intelligence measures implemented by federal agencies

So, since these devices have the software to track and reconstruct someone’s whereabouts, download extensive personal information, manage applications (apps) that include sensitive personal information, the court determined that without a warrant the scope of an individual’s privacy was at significant risk, and that cell phones needed to be treated with greater scrutiny, due to significant technological advances, which justified the Supreme Court to unanimously revere the California Court of Appeals decision, and require a warrant for the search and seizure of cellular phones, and the data stored within (Riley, n.d.).

Many users are subject of Security and Privacy on the Internet issue. The term "information" now is more used when defining a special product or article of trade which could be bought, sold, exchanged, etc. Often the price of information is higher many times than the cost of the very computers and technologies where it is functioning. Naturally it raises the need of protecting information from unauthorized access, theft, destruction, and other crimes. However, many users do not realize that they risk their security and privacy online.

Ever since the events of September 11, 2001, when terrorists used commercial airliners to attack the homeland and kill nearly 3,000 people, Americans have been faced with a conundrum. How does a nation of free people balance an individual’s right to privacy with the transparency necessary to secure the safety of the citizenry? Typically this debate has been waged regarding things such as full-body security scanners, National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance programs, and increased investigation powers granted to local police. However, recently the debate has struck far closer to home; into the purses and back pockets of nearly every American. Consumers are demanding that manufacturers and software developers do everything possible to provide the best communication security possible. This has led to an explosion of encrypted communication methods and secure devices which in turn poses an issue for law enforcement and intelligence agencies. How does the nation reconcile these two needs; on one hand, Americans expect their communications to be completely private, while the government requires a means to review the communications of criminal and terrorist suspects for investigations. Do technology developers have an obligation to build in backdoors for government exploitation or provide decryption keys to law enforcement? Does the government have the right to hack those security measures if companies don’t comply with requests for assistance? How will these two differing

In the last decade it’s amazing how technology has advanced over the years and will continue to advance for many years to come. Every year there is a new cell phone from Apple or Samsung, with new features that make our lives more convenient. From faster software to higher picture quality and so on. I am unable to recall the last time I used a camera to take pictures or went to the bank to deposit a check. Technology advances every day and many can’t wait to see what’s next to come. But with new technology comes greater risk for violations of privacy. In the following research paper I will discuss the types of security breaches and the cost associated with these breaches that businesses around the world face on a daily basis.

A threat agent is the facilitator of an attack however; a threat is a constant danger to an asset.