preview

Does Victimization Reduce Self-Control? A Longitudinal Analysis

Decent Essays

Introduction Does victimization reduce self-control? A longitudinal analysis, was written in 2011 by Robert Agnew and five additional scholars. The title of the article lets the reader know exactly what will be tested. Agnew and his colleagues planned to study the effects of victimization on self-control. The author submitted one hypothesis that was not clearly stated, saying “Arguing that victimization reduces self-control, drawing primarily on general strain” (Agnew et al. 2011). If proven their hypothesis would clarify the relationship between self-control and victimization and could also point to other sources of low self-control. Several factors influenced self-control but the variance remained unexplained. This study was adequately conceptualized …show more content…

A trend study was the exact type of longitudinal study used. A longitudinal analysis was the best experimental procedure for this experiment being that data was collected from a different population over the years. The researchers said that, “Longitudinal studies better address issues of casual order…” (Agnew et al. 2011). The question asked by researchers was simply ignored in previous studies. Their question is important because it could help those who deal with individuals who lack self-control. Understanding what causes individuals to react the way they do could help develop treatment plans for those involved in related fields. Researchers isolated this variable (victimization) and decided to point out the importance it played. Using the Gang Resistance Education and Training (GREAT) evaluation survey as their key instrument of measure, the researchers used five waves of panel data. A total of 839 students were selected from six cites (Las Cruces, Lincoln, Omaha, Phoenix, Philadelphia, and Portland). These cities were geographically diverse and the GREAT program was viable. Selecting a sample from the geographically diverse environment allows several groups to be represented equally. Data was collected in the spring of 1995 and annually in the fall afterwards. The change of time from when data was collected raised the question of the effect of seasonal change on the data. The authors did not include why they chose to …show more content…

Self-control was operationalized on an 8-item scale assessing risk seeking, impulsive behaviors, and attitudes. Victimization was operationalized by parental attachment, parental monitoring, school attachment, delinquent peer association, and neighborhood disorder using a 4-item scale. Each subsection of victimization was measured on its own scale. These researchers went as far as to select specific methods of victimization and self-control, which is good. Having several levels of each variable leaves out the opportunity of any missed data. One could mimic this study by selecting different levels and compare their data. The researchers were unable to use the full Grasmick scale because their data precluded them from doing so. This calls the validity of the data into question. Not using the full scale could affect the accuracy of the data if the scale was not adjusted to fit the portion they selected, thus posing a threat to the internal validity. The results of this study showed a reciprocal relationship between victimization and

Get Access