Dr Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment

This experiment was put through to show how prisoners act within a prison environment while being isolated within the cell and being forbidden from contact with people outside the jail. The prisoners were arrested in their homes and taken to the police station. The normal procedures for a convicted criminal were given, and the prisoners were then transferred to the basement of the psychology department. The basement was designed to replicate an average prison. Standard rules such as forbidden prisoner to guard eye contact were given. Guards were not allowed to address the prisoners by anything besides their uniform number. Although just an experiment, the subjects were quickly adapting to their roles. Prison guards began to harass the inmates, and the inmates began to verbally abuse each other to extreme levels. Guards also started using major brutality. Due to the drastic escalation of the physical and verbal abuse, the experiment was terminated early (McLeod). This suggests that when isolated, people can start to act more cruel than they would in

Drs. Milgram and Zimbardo both made groundbreaking discoveries in their field and led people forward based on this knowledge. Both studies originally, in thought, started out to be ethical but the way the experimenters went about the treatment of those being tested was unethical due to the mental stresses put on by both experiments. The physical humiliation the participants were put through in the Stanford Prison experiment was uncalled for. It was not right to trade the suffering experienced by participants for knowledge gained because these people are left with physiological damage because of how they were treated. In Milgram’s experiment they all believed they were shocking a man with a heart condition which brought undue stress to the teacher, but they weren’t doing any actual damage to him. In the Stanford Prison experiment the prisoners were belittled and shamed and made to feel like actual prisoners. One prisoner went on hunger strike and refused to eat unless released. The hunger strike and most of the guard’s emotional attacks caused major psychological scars and emotional damage. This is what many people actually experience when they come out of prison.

The experimental study that I chose to write about is the Stanford Prison Experiment, which was run by Phillip Zimbardo. More than seventy applicants answered an ad looking for volunteers to participate in a study that tested the physiological effects of prison life. The volunteers were all given interviews and personality tests. The study was left with twenty-four male college students. For the experiment, eighteen volunteers took part, with the other volunteers being on call. The volunteers were then divided into two groups, guards and prisoners, randomly assigned by coin flips. The experiment began on August 14th, 1971 in the basement of Stanford’s psychology building. To create the prison cells for the prisoners, the doors were taken

In 1971 Philip Zimbardo and his collages Craig Haney, Curtis Banks, David Jaffe, and ex-convict consultant, Carlo Prescott formulated a social experiment that addressed the underlying and basic physical mechanisms of human aggression (Henry, Banks, and Zimbardo, 1973). The experiment was planned to last two weeks and consist of male college students. The study was based upon the dynamic of the authority of prison guards and submissive behavior of the prisons inmates. Therefore, the experiment required for a mock prison to be built.

If I was in charge of an experiment like the Stanford Prison Experiment, I think that I would have conducted something like that. I don’t see any moral reasoning why not to, all the participants were voluntary and there was nothing illegal being conducted and extremely valuable data has been extracted from it so I do not see the point of steering clear of this type of experiment. I think a good follow on study might have been a roll reversal, would the inmates have taken a different approach to the guard duties knowing how they were treated while inmates or would they have acted even more aggressive?

Society has an influence in most of our daily activities, especially when these activities involve other people. During the Zimbardo Prison Experiment two groups of students were asked to play one of two roles, a prisoner and a guard. The good people that played the guards were completely caught up in their role as prison guard and created a new identity to match their situation. Their normal behavior would not have worked in an environment where they must be strict to keep "criminals" in check, therefore they had to change their behavior into a more ruthless and aggressive manner to fit their new role. During the reign of Nazi Germany most of the soldiers were not apparently capable of doing the acts that were committed, but because of the

Before watching this video and discussing it in class I never heard of the Stanford University Prison Experiment. I don’t think this experiment was very ethic due to the gruesome treatment that went on over thirty years ago in the basement of this university. In 1971 Dr. Philp Zimbardo a former sociologist at Stanford created a mock prison to do an unethical experiment. He wanted to test the power of a cruel environment without clear rules to change and transform “normal” people in a prison life experiment. In 2003 in Abu Ghraib, Iraq military enforcement tortured and beat people that did not want to follow the strict directions given to them. No one of ever knew about the treatment against these people if it was not pictures of proof to help

Adrien Brody (Travis) and Forest Whittaker (Michael) star in The Experiment, a film that features a group of men who have volunteered and been chosen for a psychological experiment. In the experiment the 26 men are split up into prison guards and inmates. Travis is selected as a prisoner while Michael is picked to be a guard. A set of strict rules are put into place and if at any time the rules are broken the "experiment" is over and the men will not receive their reward of $14,000 for participating. As the movie progresses things move rather quickly and as most people would probably assume, guards begin to feel like they're better than the prisoners and have all of the power. This leads to the humiliation of the prisoners at the hands of the guards. In the final act Travis leads a

For the prison experiment, Zimbardo picked random people that applied. People that applied were either going to be chosen to act as a prisoner or a guard for a set up fake prison. The people that got the position to act as the roles got paid. The point for this experiment was to see how long it would take for people to adjust to their role. Zimbardo wanted to find out if how they acted was affected by their surrounding environment or the roles that they had to fill.

Watching this video and having it concentrate on the individual, I was shocked by the results of the Zimbardo Prison Experiment and the situation with Hitler. I felt like these people weren't bad people but were lead by the moment and the situation and the environment surrounding them. The Zimbardo experiment was quite interesting to me but also shocking, I believe that we all have some type of evil in ourselves some use it all the time and some don’t. Like in the case of all does students they became brutal and mean towards their classmates, watching the video when they got one of the students that acted like the officer and the other one as a prisoner he told him “I know that you’re a nice guy but I know what you can turn into and what

The Stanford Prison Experiment was a psychology experiment performed by Philip Zimbardo in 1971. He was previously a student of Stanley Milgram who is best known for his experiments involving obedience. In order for Zimbardo to perform his project he needed the assistance of his colleagues. Zimbardo was inspired by his professor and wanted to do more. He knew exactly how to do this and began to execute his plan.

This study performed by the researchers and psychology professor, Philip Zimbardo at Stanford University in 1971 was conducted as a study of the psychological effects of incarceration both through the experience of a prisoner and prison guard. The experiment involved 24 male student volunteers who were randomly assigned roles of either an inmate or prison guard. This experiment took place in a mock prison for a duration of 14 days, during which the participants adapted to the assigned roles too well. The effects of the experiment changed both the students portraying prison guards and by those acting as prisoners. The prisoners’ behavior became passive and accepting the psychological abuse and the prison guards

The Stanford Prison experiment performed to discover the phycological effects or impacts of the prison environment on the prison guards and prisoners. Twenty-four chosen students, 12 prisoners and 12 guards, each payed $15 per day, were to stay in a stimulation prison, this investigated how easily or quickly people to take on their roles that were in the stimulated prison. The experiment was performed by Philip Zimbardo on August 14, 1971. Conducted in the basement of Stanford University the experiment that psychologists consider holding valuable data that helped with the progression in psychological research but also thought to be one of the most controversial psychological experiments on record. The experiment intended to run for a period of two

This paper serves to summarize The Zimbardo Prison Experiment, better known as The Stanford Prison Experiment which was conducted by Phillip Zimbardo in 1971 at Stanford University. The purpose of the study was to conduct research in order to better understand the psychological components of human aggression and submission to include conformity and obedience in a prison environment with a select group of subjects playing roles as either prison guards or inmates, however, I should note, according to McLeod, S. (2016), The Navy’s intent or purpose for the experiment was to better understand how to train members of the armed forces on how to cope with stress associated with captivity as opposed to making American Prison systems more humane. Another interesting point of note is that Zimbardo conducted this experiment shortly after World War II, and the Vietnam War where concern was raised as to some of the atrocities carried out in those wars where “ordinary” people conducted heinous acts per instruction from so-called authoritative figures. Experiments with similar objectives were carried out by Stanley Milgram and others. (Jones, A. D., & Milgram, S. 1974)

This report on the Stanford Prison Experiment will define the ethical issues related to prisoner treatment and prison culture in a mock scenario created 1971. The findings of this study define the inclination towards corruption and riotous behavior within the overarching relationship between guard and the prisoners. In a short period of time,. The prisoners became hostile and sought to start a riot in order to free themselves from abuses of the prison guards. In some instances, the issue of role-playing limited to reality of the event, but the ethical issues related to issue of prison corruption became evident in the study. The Stanford Prison Experiment provided some important aspects on how good people can became violent lawbreakers within the orison system. In essence, the ethical and experimental conditions of the Stanford Prison experiment define the corrupting culture of prisons in American society during the early 1970s.