POINT(Rhett): When you turn 18, it does entitle you to various things including the right to vote, enlist in the army, and marry (ProCon). But many rights are imposed upon a person when turning 21. Most of which could potentially be a lot more harmful to themselves and others. For example, to purchase a handgun, enter clubs (in most states), or adopt a child you have to be at least 21(“Young..Project”). Furthermore, in the state of Indiana you are not even allowed to use your cell phone while operating a motor vehicle if you are under the age of 21, so why should someone be allowed to drink at an age under 21? Not only does drinking under the age of 21 affect the person drinking, but also others involved. The fact of the matter is that the
First, I will discuss why 18 year olds should be entitled to the right to consume alcohol when they hit adulthood, rather than waiting until the age of 21. When you turn 18 years old you’re allowed to vote in elections, get married, smoke, get tried in a court of law as an adult, gamble, get life insurance, and fight in the armed forces
For the past 30 years, the United States has maintained a National Minimum Drinking Age Act, with long term public debate about the violation of civil liberties of this policy, especially in youth rights. As a matter of fact, at eighteen years old, young people can take on many adult responsibilities, but they do not have the right to consume alcohol. Indeed, they have the rights to vote, smoke cigarettes, serve on juries, get married, sue others, be sued, be imprisoned, sign contracts, be prosecuted as adults, and join the military which includes risking one's life. Even though they now considered legal adults with all of these privileges, they are denied the right to purchase and drink alcohol. Prohibiting persons under the age of 21 to enjoy
When you become an adult you can vote, join the military, jury duty, sign contracts, marry, apply for loans, make decisions regarding medical treatments, and be prosecuted as an adult (“Should the Drinking Age Be Lowered From 21 to a Younger Age?”). Adults have the right to make their own decisions, and there are many arguments on why 18-year-olds should be able to consume alcohol legally. In other countries like Europe with an MLDA of 18, there are fewer drunk driving traffic accidents and fatalities than an MLDA of 21 in America (“Should the Drinking Age Be Lowered From 21 to a Younger Age?”). Many argue that the government and the police should worry more about every legal person’s alcohol consumption instead of just underaged
At the age of 18, every individual who is a legal citizen of the United States of America has the option to vote, marry the love of their life, enter law abiding contracts with banks, watch R rated movies without the presence of an adult, serve in every branch of the military, and buy tobacco products. These remain key choices given to those entering adulthood, but one choice not given to those who are legally considered adults is drinking. 30 years ago this July, the National Drinking Age Act passed. This act required that those who live in the United States must wait till the age of 21 to consume alcohol legally. According to Camile Pagila, this is “absurd”, “unjust”, and “a violation of civil liberties.” Although those words could be used to describe forcing adults to wait till they are 21 to drink, in “Keeping Legal Drinking Age at 21 Saves 900 Lives Yearly: Study,” Bahar Gholipour shows that these laws that keep the drinking age at 21, save lives and protect young adults from the dangers that come from drinking.
At the age of 18, any individual who is a legal citizen of the United States of America has the option to vote, marry the love of their life, enter law abiding contracts with banks, see R rated movies without the presence of an adult, serve in any branch of the military, and buy tobacco products. These are important choices given to those entering adulthood, but one choice not given to those who are legally considered adults is drinking. 30 years ago this July, the National Drinking Age Act was passed. This act required that those who are in the United States must wait till the age of 21 to consume alcohol legally. According to Camile Pagila, this is “absurd”, “unjust”, and “a violation of civil liberties.” Although those words could be used to describe forcing adults to wait till they are 21 to drink, in “Keeping Legal Drinking Age at 21 Saves 900 Lives Yearly: Study,” Bahar Gholipour shows that these laws that keep the drinking age at 21, save lives and protect young adults from the dangers that come from drinking.
The United States is one of the four countries in the world with a legal drinking age as high, or higher, than 21 years of age. Reportedly the reason for this is because it helps to lower th
“The health board says some U.S. studies show that country’s legal drinking age of 21 leads to fewer crashes.” (Should we raise the drinking age to 21? (n.d.). Retrieved March 21, 2017, from https://canadasafetycouncil.org/news/should-we-raise-drinking-age-21.). Underage drinking is a serious issue in Canada and if the legal drinking age is increased from 19 to 21 there will be fewer accidents to deal with. The legal drinking age in Canada should be increased to 21 years old because teenagers will be more responsible when they drink, it sets you for a healthier future, and drinking at a young age can cause major health issues including liver damage.
The legal drinking age in Australia should be raised to 21 (Argue the validity of this statement)
There has been controversy in the United States on underage drinking, and if the age should be lowered. According to the book “Underage Drinking”, “It should be noted that more than tobacco and illegal drugs, alcohol is easily the most commonly used and abused substance among the youth in the U.S” (Dr. Bush). Underage drinking has had major controversy for years and the government has yet to get it under control. The law states that anyone under the age of twenty-one should not be in possession of an alcohol beverage. Yet many people under the age of twenty-one have possession of it and consumes it. One writer states, “Young people are adults at 18 and if they're allowed to vote and go to war, they should be allowed to drink ..- And I don't think raising the age limit will make any real difference to our binge-drinking problem” (Gross 3-5). When it comes to lowering the drinking age, there are a lot of factors that we have to think about. I feel as though the drinking age should be lowered to eighteen. I say this because in the United States when you turn eighteen you are able to buy tobacco products, vote, get married, can be charged as an adult for a crime, and even join the military. According to ProCon, “18 is the age of adulthood in the United States, and adults should have the right to make their own decisions about alcohol consumption” (Drinking Age). I agree with that statement because most teens are already drinking before the age of twenty-one anyways. There could be great benefits if the drinking age is lowered to eighteen. Most teens drink because it’s against the law and if the drinking age was lowered, the amount of binge drinking would decrease. According to the SSDP website, “A legal drinking age of 21 significantly impacts undergraduate students, a majority of whom fall in the age range of 18-20 years old and still use alcohol” (Lowering the drinking age). Most people are eighteen when they go off to college and with that being said, I’m not saying they’re going to consume alcohol, but some may choose to do so and I don’t feel as though they should be punished for doing it because technically they are considered as an adult so why can’t they live their life like one?
“Congratulations, at age 18, you’ve reached an important milestone. You are now an adult in the eyes of the law; you now have the right to make many important decisions about where you live, what you do and how you shape your future” (citation). I believe the drinking age in America should be 18 because when you’re 18 you’re an adult with a lot of responsibilities; you can vote, pay taxes, marry and fight in the army. This has been a worldwide debate for decades, and continues to, as we argue that it should be changed to 18. Turning 18 is a huge step in everyone’s life, just like it was when I turned 18 a few months ago. All these things I can do now, I can vote, marry, fight in the army, own a gun, I could even run for governor of the state Rhode Island if I wanted to! The question is, if I can do all of that, why can’t I drink?
The issue of underage drinking has been constant for many years. The law for the minimum drinking age allows people 21 and older to legally drink alcoholic beverages. It is hard to enforce this law especially on college campuses where lots of underage drinking takes place. Someone that is 18 and older can get into some clubs where they are getting drinks even though they are not supposed to. There is a level of responsibility they needs to be taken when people are drinking. They should know how to handle themselves when alcohol is in their system. Consuming too many alcoholic beverages can cause health issues, behavior issues, and have other harmful effects on a person. The issues that come along with drinking alcohol will affect teenagers and college students more than it would affect someone that is 21 or older. The minimum drinking age law should remain at 21 to keep more young adults from encountering issues associated with drinking.
With an emphasis on underage drinking, the task has encouraged the researcher to conduct research on the topic in depth as well as the consequences both parents and children can face when underage drinking occurs. From this interest and an obvious issue in the wider society, the hypothesis “ Parents accept underage drinking as a norm in our society” has been crafted. The research project should allow the researcher with new understandings and also provide subjects involved with them too. Through both primary research methodologies including a questionnaire and interview, and secondary research methods i.e. literature review the researcher will gain an in depth perception about why underage drinking has become a norm in our society and some of the consequences that parents are unaware of when they are providing alcohol for their children. The researchers overall primary aim is to determine whether or not this hypothesis is accurate.
Some people believe that the legal drinking age in the United States should be 18 instead of 21. They think this because you can fight for your country and vote that you should be able to drink. Even though these might seem like good points, there are many more reasons the age is set at 21. There is a lot of research behind how alcohol effects kids under 21. There is a lot of safety reasons behind why the age is 21. Last, making is legal for teenagers to drink leads to worse drug use, and younger kids more likely to try it and buy it from teenagers.
The death of a loved one is a tough thing to bear, it is even worse when that death comes from a
When a person turns 18, they legally become an adult in the eyes of the law. This alone opens many doors for a young person to get a sense of independency and responsibility. If young adults are considered legal in the eyes of the law, why are they not considered old enough to drink? Young adults should be permitted to legally consume alcohol at the age of 18 because they are not only old enough, but mature enough to understand the effects and uses of it. In order to legally drink in the United States, young adults have to be 21 years old. The government made the legal drinking age 21 years old because they believe that at that age, you are mature enough to handle the effects of it. In 1984, the National Minimum Drinking Age Act was passed. This act stated that if the government did not make it so that the drinking age was 21 years old, they would lose up to 10 percent of their funding for federal highways. When readingthis act, it says:“The 1984 National Minimum Drinking Age Act, [23 U.S.C. § 158], requires that States prohibit persons under 21 years of age from purchasing or publicly possessing alcoholic beverages as a condition of receiving State highway funds. A Federal regulation that interprets the Act excludes from the definition of "public possession," possession "for an established religious purpose; when accompanied by a parent, spouse or legal guardian