Alexandre Dumas. Writer. Playwright. Political Activist. Astounding many, Alexandre possessed many talents and still recognize him and discuss his works today. Most renowned for being the author of the very well known historical fiction books, Three Musketeers and The Count of Monte Cristo, Alexandre wrote of countless works of literature ranging from plays to memoirs, newspaper articles to politically charged papers. In multiple instances, Dumas composed novels actually based or influenced by real life stories, experiences and people he interacted with in his life. Consequently the lessons he learned transferred into themes in his novels, turning them into masterpieces that affect society for generations. Due to this fact, it is only right to examine one of Dumas’s background affected his writings and his works by providing him materials and resources to use in his novels and the political views to attack certain people and ideas. In turn his works affected society by …show more content…
An obvious example would be his travel memoirs, which were about his travels through Russia, Italy and Switzerland (Taylor). Being extravagant, Dumas loved to add flair to his works by describing duels, poisonings, disguises, and coincidence. Dumas’s love for the Romantic style, a style characterized by larger than life heroes and a there being a battle between good and evil with clearly delineated sides, most likely stems from reading books by Victor Hugo and Alfred de Vigny who were both romantic style writers. Besides that almost all of his fiction works were based upon history and a historical context, exclusively France’s. He believed that history was meant to be used as a canvas for his works. For instance he obtained the entire idea for The Count of Monte Cristo from a memoir written by a man named Jacques Peuchet. According to Jennifer
The division of labor is a complex phenomenon that is characterized by varying aspects of an individual’s social connection to the society in which they reside. The Division of labor is a broad process that affects and influences many aspects of life such as political, judicial, and administrative functions (Bratton & Denham, 2014). Two of the main sociological theorists, Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim, had different understandings of the notion about the division of labor. This topic has been contested and debated by many theorists but this paper is going to focus on how Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx views this topic. Karl Marx views the division of labor as a process that alienates the individual from their work (Llorente, 2006). Marx also views the division of labor as a way for the capitalist bourgeoisie to take advantage of the wage labor of the proletariat. Emile Durkheim identifies with Marx in the economic sense that the division of labor furthers the rationalization and bureaucratization of labor, but differs in that the division of labor provides individuals in society with social solidarity and ensures their connection to society. This paper is going to reflect on some of the aspects in which Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx view the division of labor, while showing some of the similarities and differences between the two theorists conception of the topic.
Nonviolent resistance is the practice of achieving goals such as social change through symbolic protests, civil disobedience, economic or political noncooperation, satyagraha, or other methods, without using violence. This type of action highlights the desires of an individual or group that feels that something needs to change to improve the current condition of the resisting person or group. It is largely but wrongly taken as synonymous with civil resistance. Each of these terms nonviolent resistance and "civil resistance has its distinct merits and also quite different connotations and commitments.The modern form of non-violent resistance was popularised and proven to be effective by the Indian leader Mahatma Gandhi in his efforts to gain
Emile Durkheim (1858-1917) was a French sociologist who strongly influenced the discipline of sociology. It was apparent to Durkheim that since the French Revolution, the nation had been wracked by conflict and moral crisis (Stones, 2008). At the individual level, rising suicide rates reflected a growing sense of malaise. Durkheim’s goal was to develop a sociology that would help France overcome this continuing moral crisis. By tracing the influences on Durkheim to his predecessor August Comte and the German scholars of experimental psychology, it is possible to understand how Durkheim came to the conclusion that society is greater than the individual, and how his idea of a collective
Emile Durkheim was French sociologist. He was born on April 15, 1858 in Epinal, France. Epinal is located in the Eastern French Province, Lorraine. His father, Moise was the Chief Rabbi of Epinal, Vosges, and Haute-Marne, while his mother, Melanie, worked as an embroiderer. Durkheim was the youngest of their four surviving children.
Ancestors can only tell of what they've been told, and sometimes it isn't the whole story or the truth. But there are no records of the Underground Railroad and so estimates from ancestors and historians are all that can be contrived to come up with an idea of what really happened on and away from the plantations.
Dumas, Alexandre. The Count of Monte Cristo. Trans. Lowell Bair. New York: Bantam Edition, 1956. Print.
The excepted social theory of civilization’s social process was made by the scientists Adam Smith, John Millar, Adam Ferguson, and lastly Lord Kames. This social theory was that there were many levels of civility in a society. These levels were hunting, pasturage, agriculture, and commerce. One example of the first level which is hunting is the the Native Americans. The excepted social process is that a country was to go through all of these levels by starting out on hunting and eventually the society would mature and work its way up to the point of being a commercially based society. Now this process helped shaped the colonies culture of “civility” because the colonists were never hunters. When the colonists got to the North America
This week we talked about the U.S. history and racial equality. Specifically what I want to focus on is the radical movements of this time period. With the Indians and Blacks with how they used these to influence society. With the Indians it was with the red power movement and with the Blacks it was with black power movement. The Indians used their influence to try to get the land back that they lost and with one of their main activists being incarcerated Leonard Peltier did not help in the process. Also with the American Indian Movement had their own concept of ideas and solutions that changed how people think. The blacks used their influence and started the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. Their main activists were
Question 8: The Federal Government’s Response on the Red Power Movement at Alcatraz and Wounded Knee
For the past couple years, it seems as if the spotlight on American politics has only gotten brighter. This makes sense - as I've grown and matured I pay more attention to the occurrences around me. Activism has only increased as a higher percentage of population finds their voice and support from more and more allies.
Malcolm X stood for the civil rights of all people despite their personal affiliations but he especially focused on African-American’s and their right to equality. In Civil Rights Movement Encyclopedia Britannica stated, “Malcolm X was an early leader of this “black power” movement” (encyclopedia Britannica). Malcolm was an admirable person because he always knew he wanted to fight for something bigger than himself. He did so by fighting for the rights of millions of people because he knew it was the noble thing to do. According to Encyclopedia Britannica in Malcolm X, “In contrast to King’s strategy of nonviolence, civil disobedience, and redemptive suffering, Malcolm urged his followers to defend themselves ‘by any means necessary’” (Encyclopedia
In life there are many situations where rebellion is required for change and improvement. Some are simple, like growing up and learning not to do certain things and others are more complex like when a group of people stand up for what they believe, for example, women’s rights and black’s rights. I believe that rebellion is healthy for any growing society. There are many things that we do not agree with, whether it is the law or our parent’s instructions. By rebelling we can change our society and/or ourselves for better.
In general, we see that Dumas's novel is at least based in history, although he takes great departures. The one great exception to this is Lady de Winter.
The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were full of evolving social and economic ideas. These views of the social structure of urban society came about through the development of ideas taken from the past revolutions. As the Industrial Revolution progressed through out the world, so did the gap between the class structures. The development of a capitalist society was a very favorable goal for the upper class. By using advanced methods of production introduced by the Industrial Revolution, they were able to earn a substantial surplus by ruling the middle class. Thus, maintaining their present class of life, while the middle class was exploited and degraded. At this time in history, social
“Despite all the ghastliness in the world, human beings are made for goodness, the ones that held in high regard are not militarily powerful nor economically prosperous. They have a commitment to try and make the world a better place” (Desmond Tutu,15)- Archbishop Desmond Tutu. Strong words of hope and faith in humanity come from a man who is regarded in the same heights as Ghandi. Archbishop Desmond Tutu is a survivor of the deadly disease known as, Tuberculosis. According to the CDC, “One third of the world’s population is infected with TB” . A staggering number, but the amount of deaths from TB is even more astonishing, “1.8 million deaths in 2015” (Center for Disease Control). Most people get confused with what exactly tuberculosis even is, whether people say it’s like the flu or bronchitis, but it’s something truly life threatening. Tuberculosis is not exclusive to only one race, ethnicity, or gender, tuberculosis is able to kill anyone regardless of age. Therefore, it is important to raise awareness and educate all the people in the world of the Tuberculosis.