Duty To Warn Law Essay

The responsibility to protect and obligation to warn: Duty to protect is the moral liability of the counselor to protect the client from self-harm. Whereas, the requirement to inform is a salutation where the advocate has a legal obligation to warn third parties of predictable danger caused

The duty to warn and protect is the result of the Supreme Court case Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California. (Gehring 1982) In this case the courts decided that a psychotherapist having knowledge of the

The article “Duty to Warn and Protect: Not in Texas” cites the 1999 Texas Supreme court decision in the case Thapar v. Zezulka; which stated that counselors do not have a duty to warn and protect because it breaks client/counselor confidentiality (Barbee, Combs, Ekleberry, & Villalobos, 2007). As a result of the 1999 ruling the

According to HIPAA “the disclosure of PHI is prohibited, except when the patient has signed a release of information form that authorizes PHI to be released or disclosed to a specific party (Sheahan)”. With the release of information there are different rules that need to be followed in order to protect the patient’s privacy. With mental health information in a patient’s medical record, it makes the release of information more difficult and there are different rules that need to be followed in order to protect the patient’s privacy.

Evidence of his wife’s adultery was presented at trial and the husband was granted a divorce on that ground by the trial court. Derby v. Derby, 378 S.E. 2d 74 (Va. Ct. App. 1989) The trial court also held that the separation agreement was invalid due to terms of unconscionability and constructive fraud or duress. Derby v. Derby, 378 S.E. 2d

There are several ethical dilemmas that the mental health professionals that are working as a team will face including “ensuring that the client has given informed consent, maintaining client confidentiality, and involving professionals, paraprofessionals, and family in appropriate coordinated processes that benefit the client” (Paproski & Haverkamp, 2000, p.96).

The client to be discussed in this assessment report is Mr. John Jones. Mr. Jones was twenty-one-years of age when he was evaluated on March 2, 2010. Mr. Jones was referred for an assessment by his psychiatrist. Mr. Jones and his mother presented on for this assessment and each were seen individually with Mr. Jones permission after he agreed to and signed the informed consent. Mr. Jones was informed through the informed consent that since was referred by his psychiatrist, his psychiatrist would receive a copy of the assessment. However, due to Mr. Jones age and limits of confidentiality, the discussion with Mr. Jones’ mother was limited in order to maintain and follow the code of ethics.

The situation is the decision to breach the confidentiality between a client and his patient. The therapist has to decide if the client will pose a threat to himself or any other 3rd party, or society as a whole. If the therapist feels in any way that the client could be a threat, he has the right to notify the person or the correct officials to insure that no harm comes to anyone involved.

When mental health counselors work with various clients during their career, they need to practice confidentiality and privacy when conducting one-on-one, group, or any type of counseling services. Like any medical patient, mental health clinicians need to treat their clients with dignity and respect. It is extremely important for the mental health counselor working with his or her assigned caseload

1. The issue is whether public school officials have the authority to perform strip searches of students in suspicion of hiding illegal drugs.

The disclaimer that protects Sierra Nevada Trees Inc. from liability in a claim for consequential damages contained in the purchase order acknowledgement is part of the agreement with Burger Ranch Inc. Burger Ranch Inc. accepted the terms of the offer and there was proper performance by both parties.

Confidentiality, privileged communication, and the duty to protect are important aspects of the social work world. All of these things, that I have found, coincide with our state laws and code of ethics main points. It is likely that they may have some discrepancies, but in the end, they follow the same central rule. Confidentiality, privileged communications and duty to protect is a huge aspect of being a social worker and when need to make sure that we are following the laws so that we do not get in trouble or a malpractice case filed.

As a counsellor I have an obligation to follow professional standards and apply appropriate behaviour defined by mental health associations. The purpose of this is to prevent harm to clients as well as to define my own professional values.

Ethical and legal obligations apply to all members of society. As one in society, the obligation to act in an ethical, law abiding manner on a daily basis is vital to the integrity of daily life. Many professions have their own code of ethics. Financial reporting is not exempt from such ethical and legal standards. One’s lively hood depends on decisions made in the business world. Business transactions are done daily and can impact one’s economic stability. Trust is placed in the hands of corporate America and an obligation of financial reporting to reveal a complete honest and legal picture of an entity’s accounting practices is important in attaining trust. This paper will discuss the obligations of

The second ethical issue occurred when the psychologist disclosed information about Mr. Hartwig’s to his psychiatrist without Mr. Hartwig’s consent. The psychologist motivations for contacting Mr. Hartwig’s psychiatrist appears to be ethical. He was attempting to establish a collaborative relationship with the psychiatrist in order to maximize the effectiveness of each for of treatment in order to best serve the client (APA, 2002). However, The APA guidelines on stipulate that while psychologist should attempt to establish a collaborative relationship they must request release from the client before disclosing confidential information (APA, 2002). The client shared the name of his psychiatrist, but there was no evidence that the client consented to an exchange of information between the two professionals. In addition to the psychologists’ obligation to obtain consent to disclose information to the psychiatrist; he was also ethically obligated to ensure that the client understands what he/she is giving consent for. Koocher and Keith-Spiegel, suggest elements that a release-of-information form should include; who the information is to be released to, and any limitations on the information to be released (2008). If the client consented to disclosure with the