Economic Growth of the Coca-Cola Company

The next stage is a stage of providing the actual change actions. Here, the company has chosen a new CEO and President, Douglas Daft, who was an opposite of Ivestor. Daft was a delegator, who wanted to turn Coca-Cola to a most desired company by employees in the world. He also saw a company as a head of the class, when speaking about diversity of workforce and business. Daft was fast in his actions. He has put Ware on the position of Vice-President for Global Public Affairs, as he was concerned about diversity issues in the company as well. They applied Ware’s suggestions about supporting the diversity from the top-executives and tying compensation increases to the achievement of diversity goals. On this stage, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia approved the Settlement Agreement, which was used to non-hourly U.S.-based workers of the company, excluding its bottlers and called for pay-back to employees, future pay equity and equal employment opportunity. Task Force was created to provide an independent supervision of company’s compliance and was reporting on implementation of these programs. On this stage, Coca-Cola learned a lot about its past mistakes and provided dozens of changes to its policies and procedures. As it is not possible to change a whole organization in a short-time period, Coca-Cola was implementing changes during the next decade after a lawsuit and even created a document, called “Manifesto of

7. Strong brand recognition of all Coca-Cola products through advertising and marketing by associating with celebrity brand ambassadors (Aamir Khan, for instance)

cultural factors can influence the way a product is viewed by the consumer. If the government were to release a report regarding one of PepsiCo’s products then the company might see a decline in sales. Environmental factors include issues regarding the environment and what the company does to protect it. PepsiCo believes that water is a basic human right and should be readily available to any consumer. Overall PepsiCo does a great job in assessing all of the general environment factors in order to sustain a positive view in the consumer’s eyes.

The political situation of a country affects its economic settings and economic environment affect the business performances. Coca-Cola sales are impacted by a set of economic factors that beyond are beyond the company’s control. These factors include the level of economic growth in the country and in the industry, tax rates and currency exchange rates, interest rates, labor costs and others. The global economic and financial crisis of 2007 – 2009 is a relevant example of an economic factor that greatly impacted the majority of businesses around the globe. However, the crisis has impacted Coca-Cola to a lesser extent compared to many other businesses. Its’ operating margin remained at industry-front 22% despite the crisis, although dividend yield was reduced to 2.6 % Quarts. (Timmons, H. (2014). Economic factors relate to goods, services, and money. Despite directly affecting businesses, these variables refer to financial state of the economy on a greater level –whether it be local or global, inflation increases cost of production. Consequently, Coca-Cola had to face the uncontrollable problem of increasing their pricing. With this increase they risk losing customers who cannot afford their products because it is a desired product not a necessity. Due to inflation in 11 years the price of an identical bottle of Coca Cola has doubled in price. Alternatively, Coca Cola could be forced to lower their prices to facilitate an increase in consumption

PepsiCo is the 3rd largest manufacturer of food and beverage products with a total just shy of 30 billion dollars in sales, while Coca Cola is the 5th largest manufacturer of food and beverage products with a total of 21.5 billion in sales. The products that both PepsiCo and Coke Cola concentrate their manufacturing efforts on are products that are easily consumed and/or prepared. Therefore, PepsiCo leads the sales in convenient food and beverage category, sustaining 22% of sales. Coca Cola also has a large percent of total sales in this category coming in under PepsiCo with 12%. One important thing to remember when evaluating PepsiCo and Coca Cola is that although PepsiCo may outperform Coca Cola in a number of key statistics, this is not the case when

The net profit was $6,320 million in FY2010, an increase of 6.3% over 2009 ($5,946). As stated in the mission statement, they seek to produce financial rewards. With the numbers previously mentioned, we can see they have succeeded. This significant financial performance gives them the resources they need to provide opportunities for growth and enrichment to their employees, their business partners and the communities in which they operate and to invest in the four key areas (performance, human sustainability, environmental sustainability and talent sustainability) so they can reach their goals. (Yahoo Finance, 2011) 4. Conduct a competitive and marketing analysis of the organization to determine strengths and opportunities. PepsiCo is the largest snack and non-alcoholic drink producer in the United States, with 39% and 25% of the respective market shares. PepsiCo operates in over 200 countries, with its largest markets in North America and the United Kingdom. PepsiCo has three direct competitors, the Coca-Cola Company, Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, and Kraft Foods. Unlike its major competitor, Coca-Cola, the majority of PepsiCo 's revenues do not come from carbonated soft drinks. In fact, beverages account for less than 50% of total revenue. Additionally, over 60% of PepsiCo 's beverage sales come from its key noncarbonated brands like Gatorade and Tropicana. PepsiCo 's revenues

One of the external factors that have an effect on Coca-Cola is the newer technology. People know that Coca-Cola first provide their product in a form of a fountain drink. It has a fixed ingredient ready for people to get some ice and get Coke from their fountain. But with the advances in the technology today, Coke has invented a new Freestyle soda machine that allows people to create a custom beverage for themselves. Their new machine benefits Coca-Cola because it can shake up the market. It gets people to become curious and want to try it out the new machine. This is an opportunity that could boost the sales for coke and their other fountain drink products.

In 1886, the Coca Cola Company was developed but it wasn 't until 1898 that the fierce competitor Pepsi-Cola entered into the market. These 2 companies are the two major players that dominate the consumer beverage (soft-drink) industry. Coke and Pepsi have since been competing to rein the global market in consumer beverages. The market of drinks in the United States alone is valued at more than thirty million dollars annually. With the growth of these two companies, PepsiCo has developed and acquired additional products outside the scope of just the consumer beverage industry, these products have helped the company to increase their exposure and position in the global market. This has not been the case for the Coca Cola Company; they

Sales in the United States are declining due to the public concern over sugar. Sales in Europe and Japan are flat, while markets in China and India offer up strong completion for Coca-Cola. Africa’s middle class population is growing at a steady rate, so the disposable income is increasing. This creates an opportunity for Coca-Cola to tap into growth opportunities (Natalia Cheverri 2012).

As mention before, Coca-cola has 47.3 percent market share in the country’s cola market versus Pepsi which hold 44.5 percent. Coca-cola is also the brand known around the worlds, which are the largest producer and distributor of ark colas in the world. Even in the current monetary crisis, the company continues to expand and the financial position shows that Coca-cola has a strong cash position in compare to PepsiCo which the long term debt of PepsiCo is so high.

The Coca Cola Company has been acquiring various local beverages companies aggressively over the last decade. Also, the company has increased its stake in major bottling operations.

The Coca Cola industry is a vibrant model that started in 1886 by John Styth Pemberton who was a pharmacist in Atlanta, which is the capital; headquarter for the Coca Cola Company. It is the world’s primary manufacturer of non-alcoholic beverage and operates on a global scale across over 200 countries worldwide with over 500 brands. The company is widely recognized by 94% of the world’s population (coca cola Company.com). Coca Cola is largely successful, has become the iconic beverage of the American culture, is ranked number three in the world, and is regard as “happiness in a bottle worldwide (bestglobalbrand.com) The company post revenue of 5.37 billion dollars with a 2% rise in the North American market (NBC.com). This report will therefore examine many different aspect of the Coca Cola company which as allow them to become the beverage and brand of choice worldwide.

Coca Cola and Pepsi are the two most popular and widely recognized beverage brands in the United States. Pepsi and Coca Cola contrast each other on their taste, its associated colors and themes, and ingredients. Even the pension plans and funding status are a competitive comparison.

Firstly we start with the sociological or also known as demography. This is the study of human population from many perspective such as race, ethnicity, gender and many other. For Coca Cola to serve in different country require a many marketing research to be done. Coca Cola currently serves in 6 different region which is the North America, Latin America, Europe Eurasia, Africa, and Asia Pacific. Different country has different type of demand for Coca Cola. As consumer now become more health conscious, they have started to develop product such as coke light, coke zero which contain zero sugar content. This is a reactive approach taken by Coca Cola to adapt to the ever changing environment in order to stay competitive in the industry.

PepsiCo and Coca-Cola are fierce competitors and according to their financial statements they are both healthy companies. Therefore I would invest in Coca-Cola if I had to make the decision because it has higher income, a stronger long-term debt to networking capital ratio, steadily rising net income per common share, and a climbing and high solvency ratio. PepsiCo still shows healthy growth and outperforms Coca-Cola in many areas. I will conduct a financial analysis of Coca-Cola and PepsiCo to identify their strengths and weaknesses, ultimately deciding which one is worth the investment.