Between the late 17th century and the beginning of the 18th century, crime was generally perceived as a rising lower-class problem which required brutal suppression. For this reason, the criminal justice, particularly in the latter part of the 17th century, became more punitive and coercive: corporal punishments such as flogging, mutilation and execution were increasingly used as predominant sanctions (Braithwaite, 1993). These forms of punishments often took place in public, as the main objective at the time was to put offenders into highly stigmatic shame through brutal humiliation, degradation and out casting (Beattie, 1984). Prisons at the time were typically characterised by no segregation of men from women, no classification of offenders, and no segregation of tried and untried offenders (Muncie and McLaughlin). In the late 18th century, as recorded by John Howard (penal reformer), the regimes implemented in prisons were such that offenders were living in appalling conditions: indeed, Howard reported that prisons were poorly ventilated and illuminated, and they were mostly characterised by lack of sanitation, washing facilities and cleanliness. Nevertheless, throughout the 18th century, influential personalities such as …show more content…
It must be said, however, that although it reflected most of the ideas put forward by reformers, Brebner’s regime was innovative: indeed, unlike must prisons regimes which were characterised by unproductive hard labour, Brebner’s regime required that prisoners at Duke Street had to engage in productive, constructive and paid labour. Put another way, the crank and treadmill, which were common forms of unproductive labour, had no place in Brebner’s regime (ElectricScotland,
Between 1700 and 1900 a system familiar to our eyes emerged as a result of important changes. The 1800s very harsh and a lot of crime was done in that time. The laws, punishment and jail were similar, also very different from today's. In the 1800s the punishment was much more survivor and stick to it more than now. If you lived back in that time, it was usual to walk the streets and you see a hanging happening. This showing the cruelty and none caring of the people and how harsh the punishment was.
Change over time; that is a common theme with everything in the world. The concept of punishment is no different in that regard. In the 16th and 17th century the common view for punishing people was retaliation from the king and to be done in the town square. In what seemed to be all of a sudden, there was a change in human thinking, the concept of punishment changed to a more psychological approach compared to a public embarrassment/torture approach. The following paragraphs will discuss the development of prisons and what in fact gives people gives people the right to punish; as well as the overall meaning and function of prisons. The work by Michel Foucault in Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison will help with the arguments
Throughout the years, the use of imprisonment has varied, along with its influences of society. It is thought that although prisons have been around since the thirteenth century, prisons as we know them now to be have only been around for the last three centuries. The first uses of prisons were not seen as a form of punishment instead they were used as a way of making people do something. People would be held in prison until they paid their debts, or awaiting trial and then leading up to their sentence. McGowen (1995) suggests that from the early 1700s ‘bridewells’ a house of correction have existed, however at that time being used merely for vagrants and drunks. At the end of the sixteenth century there was a shift in punishment to imprisonment, along with this came a new, more humane idea of reform. Criminals would spend their days of prison carrying out hard labour. However after the American Revolution, imprisonment took a step back and there was another change. There was mass overcrowding within the prison service and although the death penalty was still being used it was a symbol of the power of the state. Therefore, an everyday way of dealing with offenders would be transportation to the colonies, being either Australia or America.
To try to prevent crime from occurring some believed that making the punishments severe would slow the growth of crime. The punishments you would receive, varied on how bad the crime was that you committed. If you were accused for adultery or manslaughter, you were more than likely punished with a whipping or branding. When punished with a whipping the number of hits usually varied between 10 to 30. When committing adultery, you usually were required 30 hits with the whip and a hot iron brand to the forehead. You were also made to wear something around your neck showing the crime you committed. These punishments were usually for men, women were normally sent to workhouses. Hanging was also a big punishment in the 1800s. Hangings were found to be entertainment and multiple people received a job during a hanging. (Source 2, Page 101) When hanging got out of hand, they began to send the criminals to other colonies to serve their sentences. They found that it was much cheaper than holding them in the English prisons where they were overcrowded and the traveling had to be paid for. The 1800s is known to be the worst of crime because of the increase of population and the issues with wealth. Escapes were very common because the jails were overflowing and it was too much for the people to keep up with. Not only were adults at risk but children of any age were too because society was so bad. As time moved along some of the
The delivery of punishment has changed significantly over the centuries. Up until the 19th century in England, imprisonment was not regarded as a punishment, it was merely used while the offender waited to be sentenced to their ‘real’ punishment (Bull, 2010; Hirst, 1998). Corporal punishment such as flogging, branding and mutilation, death by hanging, and transportation to other continents such as America and Australia were common punitive measures through the ages, until well into the 1800’s (Newburn, 2003). Although these extreme penalties are no longer acceptable or practised by criminal courts in England or Australia, in some ways, the past has
Crime punishment in the 17th century in London was not any better than the methods such as the death penalty used in the 16th century. Matter of fact, one could say that the punishments in the 17th century was exactly as it was in the 16th century London. During this time period, people were still being punished for committing small crimes like stealing things. “There was still support for the execution of the most serious offenders, however, and in certain contexts, such as the 1720s and 1780s, which both experienced crime waves and political instability, the proportion of convicts executed increased.” (London Lives 1690 to 1800 crimes, poverty and social policy in the metropolis). Men and women were punished almost in the same way, however, if a pregnant woman is found guilty of any crime, she was given time to deliver the baby before she faced her punishment for her crimes. In the 17th, most the famous crime punishment method was hanging, criminals who were convicted were hanged instead of given other types of punishment.
During the 17 and 18th century the British legal system was incredibly harsh, distributing death penalties for often minor offences, the aim of this was to deter individuals from committing crime. There was very
The Penitentiary Era 1790 to 1825 mass prison building era housed many prisoners with the goals of rehabilitation; deterrence and allowing the inmates to work during the day and when they returned were put into solitary confinement (Ortmeier 2006, 391). This new era was too focused on making prisoners think about their crimes and learn skills in workshops and general labor to reenter society as a productive member. Capital and corporal punishment were looked down upon by many and they did not actually fix the problems of rising crime. Often time’s prisoners were held in a large jail cells, men and women alike that resulted in rape and fighting among each other. The strengths of this era looked to keep prisoners safe and at times lessen
Europeans came to visit these institutions with the hope of using the system in their country. By the mid 1800's prison everywhere scarcely reflected the basic forms of prison. In the 1830's, many prisoners where often leased to private contractors, but was discontinued in the mid 1840's. In the 19th century it was seen that the prison system could not reform the prisoners. Citizens lost faith and felt that there was no cure to society's crime problem.
It was handled through family and willingly efforts. Prisons were for criminals to serve time for punishment not for them to rehabilitate and eventually return to the community. Eventually, mentally ill people would end up in prison as well because there were no facilities for mental illness treatment. Reformers felt as though social issues could be redeemed by creating public institutions to particularly deal with social problems. The creating of public institutions was penitentiaries. The purpose of this institution was to transform the violent individuals into good citizens that abide by the law. This includes hard work, and religious teaching. Prisons began to disappear as reformers established workhouses to keep the poor, drunks, and gamblers on the right path. Soon after, the mentally ill treatment housing was
According to Clear, Cole, and Reisig, (2013, p. 28 & 29) during the middle ages various forms of punishments were imposed on the body of the offender. Authority of government grew, and the criminal law system became more fully developed. Other forms of sanctions were applied due to the rise of trade, the breakdown of feudal order, the emergence of a middle class. In Europe before the 1800s fines and five punishments were common: galley slavery, imprisonment, transportation, corporal punishment and death. Each
In this essay I will be looking at the key developments of the British penal system since the early nineteenth century. I will also discuss how the main objectives of the prison system have changed over this period of time.
Flogging which is whipping, mutilation which made it difficult or impossible for individuals to commit future crimes, public humiliation which allowed members of the community an opportunity to humiliate offenders, in addition to creating work houses that are designed to instill habits of industry in the unemployed and or banish them. Convicted offenders were routinely subjected to physical punishment that often resulted in death. Sometimes fines were levied, but the most common form of criminal punishment generally fit the doctrine of lex talionis. This is the rule of “an eye for an eye.” During this time convicted offenders were sentenced to suffer punishment that almost exact to that of the original injury suffered by the victim(s).
There were many scholars throughout history that take various accounts into their theoretical framework to explore, as well as explain the use of societal punishment. Was societal punishment the work of political enterprises? Or was the use of societal punishment widely implemented due to the economic drive associated within the criminal justice and penal system? There are a multitude of approaches that can be explored, however two researchers, Georg Rusche and Otto Kirchheimer set out to understand a different dynamic, the relationship between the labor market and incarceration (Garland, 1991).
The corrections system in America began mostly with the arrival of William Penn and his “Great Law.” This was back in 1682; the “Great Law” was based on humane principals and also focused on hard labor as a punishment. The corrections system really began to take hold in North America in the late 1700’s with the idea’s and philosophy of Beccaria, Bentham, and Howard. These philosophies were based on the thought that prisoners could be treated and reformed back into society. This hard labor was used as an alternative to other cruel forms of punishments that were used in earlier times such as physical abuse or even brutal death.