preview

The Changing Role Of Prisons In The 18th Century

Better Essays

Between the late 17th century and the beginning of the 18th century, crime was generally perceived as a rising lower-class problem which required brutal suppression. For this reason, the criminal justice, particularly in the latter part of the 17th century, became more punitive and coercive: corporal punishments such as flogging, mutilation and execution were increasingly used as predominant sanctions (Braithwaite, 1993). These forms of punishments often took place in public, as the main objective at the time was to put offenders into highly stigmatic shame through brutal humiliation, degradation and out casting (Beattie, 1984). Prisons at the time were typically characterised by no segregation of men from women, no classification of offenders, and no segregation of tried and untried offenders (Muncie and McLaughlin). In the late 18th century, as recorded by John Howard (penal reformer), the regimes implemented in prisons were such that offenders were living in appalling conditions: indeed, Howard reported that prisons were poorly ventilated and illuminated, and they were mostly characterised by lack of sanitation, washing facilities and cleanliness. Nevertheless, throughout the 18th century, influential personalities such as …show more content…

It must be said, however, that although it reflected most of the ideas put forward by reformers, Brebner’s regime was innovative: indeed, unlike must prisons regimes which were characterised by unproductive hard labour, Brebner’s regime required that prisoners at Duke Street had to engage in productive, constructive and paid labour. Put another way, the crank and treadmill, which were common forms of unproductive labour, had no place in Brebner’s regime (ElectricScotland,

Get Access