For my event immersion, I chose to attend two different lectures. Specifically, the power of knowledge: higher education, reintegration and liberation, as well as the environment/DAPL lecture. Both lectures served as a reminder of what is necessary towards a focus on education in society. I decided to look at both lectures because of my interest in how the two potentially collide based off an interesting that I had personally. Socialization is one aspect of the conversation that does not necessarily come forth, but holds a large degree of relevance.
The significance of these lectures is that they all revolve around a need for people to be more understanding of one another through education. Education serves as a vehicle that helps people to
…show more content…
The lecture that I attended was a conversation on the environment and the DAPL. The DAPL is the Dakota Access Pipe Line, which is a point of significant conversation in the United States currently. There is an underlying focus here, where there is a sense in the lecture that emphasizes the fact that there is a butting of heads on this conversation based off the concerns about the pipeline itself. For starters, the pipeline is not something that is necessarily a partisan issue. However, it does represent two differing views, on the environment and subsequently, there has not been any success in regards to resolving the issues. A pressing issue here is the factors that go into discerning the value of a project. As Oliver and Shapiro (2008) discuss, the fact that there is some degree of racial inequality at play in these types of conflicts, especially as issues like “poor education, high joblessness, low incomes and the subsequence hardships of poverty” (p. 169) impact many. The question set forth here is the factors that differentiate the issue due in part to the fact that the DAPL impacts largely Native American people. Their plight suddenly becomes considerably less important because of these various implications. Education and socialization plays a large role in this conversation, especially as it corresponds to the earlier lecture and the notes made by Harro. The environment is not an issue …show more content…
The issue here is based on the fact that socialization ultimately works in hand with education and it applies the identities. That is, Harro (2008) found that “identities are ascribed to us at birth through no effort or decision or choice of our own” (p. 46). Considering this, it becomes increasingly difficult to create a “us vs them” scenario. When in reality, it is two groups of people who have grown up believing two different ideologies, and there is not really any type of dynamic change that is associated with this conversation. The contrast of these two conversations only add to the ongoing understanding of how difficult it is to have a difference if any. The more important conversation that is occurring here is ultimately how can one bridge the gap of knowledge and conversation that is occurring here.
Society currently stands at odds due in part to the fact that there is a gap in knowledge and socialization is at the heart of it. In the instances provided by both lecturers, they are tied by the fact that there is no real manner upon which their issues can be resolved because socialization ultimately acts as the judge and jury. They are both looking to bridge the gap between the two parties at odds that have developed. However, as Harro stated, there isn’t a realistic solution due in part to the fact that socialization is so significant in this
Socialization is the lifelong process of learning rules for adapting to social and cultural normality. Learning to follow societal rules is what allows people to survive, thrive and integrate into groups and communities within society. Through the observation of others, people begin to develop core values, beliefs and morals. This builds bonds and develops a sense of belonging within a given group. In the documentary, A Class Divided, the power of socialization is demonstrated as a third-grade teacher gives her class a hands-on lesson in discrimination and bias by separating her class in to in-groups and out-groups. This lesson not only gives a glimpse into the power of socialization showing how biases can be created, but it also helps
In this article, the plan of a pipeline that is attempting construction is being rejected by those of Native American descent who live on the affected land. Their claim is that, since the pipeline is intended to cross the Missouri River near the Standing Rock reservation, the drinking water has an extremely high risk of becoming contaminated. Since the people living there depend on the river for a majority of their basic needs―such as drinking, fishing, and irrigation―it is an argument that a vast number of lives could be greatly affected. In order to prove a crucial point, thousands have moved indefinitely to a main protest camp called Oceti Sakowin. A community has been established here, where common societal things such a school and security system have been founded.
“In a few decades, the relationship between the environment, resources, and conflict may seem almost as obvious as the connection we see today between human rights, democracy, and peace (Nobel Peace Prize Medalist Maathai 2004).” A Canadian oil company that goes by TransCanada hopes to build an oil pipeline that would extend an enormous 1,200 miles onto an already gargantuan 2,600 mile long pipeline. Keystone XL represents just under a third of the entire Keystone project, and every other piece of pipe has been built and laid out. In fact, TransCanada 's pipeline system is already shipping hundreds of thousands of barrels of crude oil from the Canadian oil sands across the U.S. border -- and into Illinois (Diamond). The current proposal would take the pipeline on a journey all the way through to Texas. Extracting crude oil from oil sands would be enormously problematic for the environment as it causes the pumping of about 17% more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than standard crude oil extraction. Tar sand oil has levels of carbon dioxide emissions that are three to four times higher than those of conventional oil, due to more energy-intensive removal and refining processes (Friends of the Earth). The construction of the Keystone XL pipeline would stimulate employment, the effects would be temporary and the whole scheme would produce a negative long term outcome. The construction of the Keystone XL pipeline has caused
Environmental justice issues are not solely about disparate health or economic effects; it also applies when the cultural and historical resources of protected groups are potentially affected by a federally funded transportation project. Native American Tribes are different than other minority groups affected by the environmental impacts of transportation projects. Interactions among tribes, the FHWA, and State DOTs should be structured as a government-to-government relationship. Consultation with tribes is therefore different from traditional public involvement outreach. Reaching out to tribes is still crucial if Federal and State agencies want to be sure that environmental justice concerns are understood and addressed.
In this article, author James McPherson discusses the key players in the Dakota Access Pipeline. He outlines not only outlines the Standing Rock Sioux tribe and the pipeline company, Energy Transfer Partners, but also the Governor of North Dakota, the Tribal Chairman,
With an increasing global population and ever industrializing society 's, environmental concern is rarely given priority over economic incentive. But what people fail to realize is that our environmental failures, and relative apathy about it set up a plethora of problems for future generations to deal with. One of the most important decisions president Obama will face in the next year will be whether or not to approve the building of the Keystone XL pipeline, a massively sized, and massively controversial oil pipeline that would stretch all the way from Alberta Canada, to American oil refineries along the Gulf Of Mexico. Despite the economic incentive present, the building of the Keystone XL pipeline should not happen because of the
Thesis: The U.S. should stop the production of the North Dakota Access Pipeline because it would break the contract made over a hundred years with the Native Americans, it violates the ninth amendment, and it is not environmentally safe.
Over the past few months’ highlights of the Sioux Native American protest in North Dakota have been prevalent in the news. Though many pieces have touched upon the reasons why the Standing Rock Sioux have been protesting such as the Dakota Access Pipeline, many articles have been opinion based and failed to relay the facts surrounding the issue of it’s construction. In an attempt to understand the situation and gain factual information surrounding the pipeline and the Standing Rock Sioux, I interviewed Professor Ron Ferguson who has followed the situation from it’s beginning.
“Environmental racism is real…so real that even having the facts, having the documentation and having the information has never been enough to provide equal protection for people of color and poor people” “It takes longer for the response and it takes longer for the recovery in communities of color and low-income communities.” (Bullard, 1994:36)
Connections How this chapter connected with me when it said “all too often student walk away from a lectures feeling like outsiders as to what they just heard, just as many of us feel left hanging after talks we attended” and That it important that author address why should we care about the topic . “. The addressing who care literally
The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe currently fights to save its only water source from natural gas and oil contamination. This troubling current event has a somewhat forgotten historical analogue where very similar themes presented themselves. The Kinzua Dam Controversy, which took place in the 1950’s and early 1960’s, resulted in the displacement of over 600 Seneca Indian families and the acquisition of a large tract of traditional Seneca Land for dam building. Additionally, the acquisition of Seneca land represented a breach of “The Treaty with the Six Nations of 1794,” which explicated prevented such action by the US Government. The dam and its construction, which primarily benefitted Pittsburg, inspired a heated discourse concerning the ethics of native relocation.
In chapter one's reading, there are many course concepts that caught my interest. The first concept that caught my eye was socialization. Difference Matters by Brenda J. Allen defines socialization as “how we are taught how to behave in the world” (Allen, 2011, p.12). We are taught socialization by our family members, teachers, peers, and the media. Children taught socialization will find their own personal social identity in society. When taught this they will think that it is real and natural for these actions to apply to them. Family members, teachers, peers, and media teach children to act a certain way in society. In doing this they will learn how to function as a respected and accepted member of their culture. For example, in my own personal life, my grandmother always told me to eat like a lady at the table. Eating like a lady included taking small bites, sitting straight up in your chair, chewing with your mouth shut, and never speaking with your mouth full. My grandmother was a southern lady she also taught me that ladies had a task to do around the home. Ladies made dinner, set the table, and cleaned up after the meal. I was always by her side absorbing everything she showed me. While the women cleaned up after dinner; my father, grandfather, and other men at the table would leave to talk or watch television. I never questioned my grandmother or the other women in my family why the men did not have to help clean up. My family was teaching me socialization and I did not even realize it. The next course concept that grabbed my attention was social identity theory. Allen describes this as “human tendency to label self and others based on individual and group identity” (Allen, 2011, p. 11). One could also describe this course concept as a group contently comparing their
It is a given that one should recognize the fact that it is uncertain as to how the DAPL controversy will inevitably be dealt with; considering both sides of the debate have strong points. The importance the Sioux place on the land they were given after decades of unfair treatment is a key part of knowing why the DAPL controversy is being dealt with the way it is. However, deciding to get rid of the pipeline entirely might prove to be a negative alternative, considering railway transportation is most likely the other option. Ultimately, it can be assumed that both parties would hope for a compromise to be made, ensuring the safety and financial aid of everyone involved. The risk is not yet present, but that should not stop one from weighing out their options. The decision not being concrete should enable those who wish to know more about their country to look into the issue and stay informed, considering information from both sides before making decisions about what they
Native Americans are being disrespected, harmed, and their homeland is being taken from them. Am I talking about events taken place centuries ago? No, because these unfortunate circumstances yet again are occurring right here, now, in the present. This horrid affair has a name: The Dakota Access Pipeline. This Pipeline is an oil transporting pipeline, which is funded by the U.S Army Corps of Engineers, who have devised a plan for the pipeline to run through the states of North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, and Illinois. However, unfortunately, this pipeline will run straight through the reservation of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. The Standing Rock Sioux tribe, expressing their distress for the pipeline have said, that the pipeline will be “Destroying our burial sites, prayer sites, and culturally significant artifacts,” Arguments for the pipeline however have tried to counter this claim, trying to emphasize that “The pipeline wouldn 't just be an economic boon, it would also significantly decrease U.S. reliance on foreign oil”, and that the pipeline is estimated to produce “374.3 million gallons of gasoline per day.”, which could help the sinking oil economy. (Yan, 2016) However, despite the economical growth it could achieve, the Dakota Access Pipeline could have damaging environmental effects on the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and the areas surrounding.
This article is another piece of written truth as to how one’s social upbringing reflects their views and opinions.