Ethical Arguments Against Euthanasia

A patient who has a terminal illness suffer tremendously every day. Since there is no cure for any terminal illness, doctors ease the patient's pain by prescribing them pain medication up to their final days. If it is acceptable for a beloved pet to be put euthanized, how is it any different for a terminally ill patient to end their life by physician-assisted suicide? Currently, terminally ill patients are fighting for their right to die. There is a hand full of states that have passed the law that allows terminally ill adult patients, who have six months to live, to end their lives by euthanasia or better known as physician-assisted suicide. Physician-assisted suicide is when a doctor performs a patient a lethal amount of substances into a patient, to end their life. The state of Virginia

It is imperative that nurses, and other healthcare providers, take a professional and personal stance in the debate. Ethical arguments against assisted suicide include pain and suffering, patient autonomy, and the quality of life. Activist for PAD believe it represents empathy since it helps patients end their pain. Pro-assisted suicide supporters claim that this practice can be added to palliative care. But does legalizing assisted suicide undermine efforts to maintain and improve good care for patients nearing the end-of-life? A broad right to physician-assisted suicide could undermine the efforts, and the will, to ensure humane and dignified care for all patients facing terminal illness or severe disability. The doctor-patient relationship

The decision to utilize euthanasia in these cases would be made by a doctor or by a close friend or family member. Some argue the optimal decision would be made with the perspective of the young or vegetative person in mind. Whoever makes the decision should be thinking about whether the person would want to be alive in this situation if they were able to make the decision. This is not always the case and the family members may make a selfish decision based on whether or not they want to care for the affected person. Some may actually believe the family should use euthanasia since their lives would be better without the stress of the sick person. The well being of the family and friends is more important than the patient’s life considering she is very likely to die anyways. Another view supports making the decision to utilize euthanasia through the perspective of bettering society. The hospital bed

The controversy of assisted suicide and euthanasia was first brought to life in the 5th century B.C. when the ancient Greeks and Romans believed in the Hippocratic Oath which said that doctors were prohibited from giving patients any type of deadly medication even if the individual asked for it, as well prohibiting physicians from suggesting such actions. Although some followed the Hippocratic Oath, some physicians often complied with their patient’s wishes and gave them the deadly medicine. Similar to current times, back in the ancient Greek and Rome times, there was widespread support of euthanasia and assisted suicide. Before the earliest statute that outlaws the practicing of assisted suicide and euthanasia came in 1828, there was already a common law that stated that such practices by physicians is considered a

When waking up in the morning at 4:30a.m, and having the interpretation to hunt. While others may agree that killing another is a justified, ending a life can be justified in the cases of hunting, Euthanasia and finally like George and Lennie.

When deciding the most righteous type of way to appropriately end a life of a love one, many thoughts come through as weather the practice of euthanasia is an ethically correct medical procedure. There are many decisions that must be made regarding how to properly treat a individual who want to end there own life. Controversial views have always been made against those who suggest that terminally ill or incurably suffering people should be allowed to ask for and receive help to die if they so wish. The same set of arguments in opposition toward euthanasia is, that life is sacred and by legalizing physician assisted suicide would lead to abuses by the medical field. A fundamental question concerning hastening the death of a terminally ill patient are, evaluating if this act is a virtue of kindness prompted by a sense of mercy and respect for an individual's wishes? If this is not a act of a moral virtue thought then, it is an act of murder and a violation of the Hippocratic Oath. Some patients who decide that they wish to commit suicide are unable or unwilling to accomplish the act without assistance from their physician. Physician-assisted suicide helps them to die under conditions, and at the time, that they choose. PAS is currently legal only in Oregon, Washington, and Montana. In other states, terminally ill individuals who want to die must continue living until their body eventually collapses or until a family member or friend commits a criminal act by helping them to

avoid talking about. People have all sorts of differing opinions about what should and what shouldn’t be legal. The methods of Euthanasia are not as inhumane as many tend to believe it is. Also, the variety of choices the patient can mulligan over is actual quite diverse in most cases.

The fourth argument is that euthanasia allows doctors to make premature and ill-informed decisions about patient’s lives. There are cases where terminally ill patients have recovered after a lengthy stay in hospitals. There are also cases where patients in a deep coma have woken up to the amusement of doctors. Continued improvements in medical technologies and innovations in related disciplines make euthanasia an ineffective option to be implemented. The reason why the scientific community is working hard to develop improved medical technologies and procedures is that it wants to ensure that sick people recover fast and that healthy people do not fall sick. Thus, allowing euthanasia will erode any gains to be realized from scientific research.

Euthanasia has always been a common topic especially a debatable one talking about allowing patients who are suffering from any incurable disease or condition or even in an irreversible coma to choose to end their live on their own terms painlessly. The following will discuss a specific case and analyzed using the Christian worldview. Since the moral debate of euthanasia is such a topic of controversy, potential solutions towards the issue, and how such solutions can be compared to the core beliefs and the values within the Christian worldview.

Euthanasia is a word from the Greek language that directly translates to “good death” (Euthanasia). Those who oppose euthanasia call this procedure immoral and unethical - but is it moral when a terminally ill patient has to bear excruciating pain while they wait to die? How is this death they receive a dignified death? Adding laws supporting euthanasia are beneficial to the patients as it is the only option that grants the terminally ill the right to die with dignity.

Source http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1174693/ : This article is relevant to the central ethical issues because it explains the back story with Dr. Kevorkian and specifically Thomas Youk’s case; also, it provides opinions of those who advocate for the rights of patients with disabilities. Diane Coleman, president of Not Yet Dead, states that this euthanasia movement that Dr. Kevorkian is overall promoting is seemingly “very threatening to disabled people”; Dr. Nancy W. Dickey, president of the American Medical Association, even adds that “patients can be relieved that the guilty verdict helps protect them from those who would have taken their life early”. Overall, I have learned that the pro-life advocates version of “proper end

On an average year, approximately 2.7 million animals are euthanized in the United States ("Pet Statistics"). Being that animal euthanasia is a horrible and selfish act, we should stop it and only allow euthanasia of an animal if they are sick and will not heal or if they are suffering. Animal euthanasia has been around for years and has been an easy way for a family to put down their precious pet that is suffering. Killing an animal because they are a stray is not ethical. Stray animals, such as cat and dogs, that are said to be mean, can be tamed to the point where they could have a new loving home. We, as human beings, should not be killing innocent animals.

The ethical issue is Euthanasia, there are many groups that support or oppose this issue. Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma. The different viewpoints are based around whether it is humane to assist someone in dying and whether it should be illegal for someone to assist the death of someone who has a terminal illness and are suffering incurable pain. Groups that oppose the issue generally believe that it is inhumane to end someone 's life early, these groups generally believe these people should be given care and as much comfort as possible until their last days. Groups that support the issue generally believe that if someone has lost their mental state or are suffering unbearable pain that cannot be cured, that they should be allowed the option of euthanasia because it is inhumane to make someone suffer unbearable pain if they do not need to. An ethical issue brings systems of morality and principles into conflict, ethical issues are more subjective and opinionated and generally cannot be solved with facts, laws and truth. Euthanasia is an ethical issue because there are two equally unacceptable options. It is considered wrong

Euthanasia is defined as, "The act or practice of putting to death painlessly a person suffering from an incurable disease." Euthanasia can be traced back as far back as the ancient Greek and Roman civilizations. It was sometimes allowed in these civilizations to help others die. Voluntary euthanasia was approved in these ancient societies. Today, the practice of euthanasia causes great controversy. Both pro-life groups and right-to-die groups present arguments for their different sides. Pro-life groups make arguments and present fears against euthanasia. I contend that the case for the right to die is the stronger argument.

Euthanasia is the practice of ending an individual's life in order to relieve them from an incurable disease or unbearable suffering. The term euthanasia is derived from the Greek word for "good death" and originally referred to as “intentional killing” ( Patelarou, Vardavas, Fioraki, Alegakis, Dafermou, & Ntzilepi, 2009). Euthanasia is a controversial topic which has raised a great deal of debate globally. Although euthanasia has received great exposure in the professional media, there are some sticky points that lack clarity and need to be addressed. Euthanasia is a divisive topic, and different interpretations of its meaning, depend on whether the person supports it or not. While a few societies have accepted euthanasia, there are