My real life situation is based on drug scandal in sports. Daniel Spencer Tonks, a former England Under16 rugby union player, tested positive for the steroid stanozolol in February. The first British rugby player given a four year ban for taking steroids says doping in the sport is widespread."There is a lot of pressure on players to be bigger, faster and stronger as they are the players who get picked,” "I wouldn't say it was coaches saying you should take something, more the fact the players want to be the best at their sport.” he said.
This lead to my knowledge question “How can we decide between competing ethical claims?”
Claim
Fairness is one of the ethical principle that is supporting on banning performance enhancing drugs
“Fairness
…show more content…
Performance enhancing drugs goes under gamesmanship which the principle is winning everything even though by cheating rather than sportsmanship which is not simply to win but winning with honour by trying your best without cheating.
“The spirit of sport is the celebration of the human spirit, body, and mind” (Savulescu, 2004)
Performance enhancing drugs improve a person strength, endurance, speed
It violates the spirit of sport
Tonks didn’t train as hard as other player to be at the same level- He stated that “There is a lot of pressure on players to be bigger, faster and stronger”, so he have decided to take drugs instead of doing more training
Drugs can lead to health risk to athletes.
Anabolic steroid can increase sportsmen’s muscle mass and strength as it produced testosterone
PED can cause heart damage, liver damage and an increased risk for blood clots
People have died from PED before
Referring to RLS, Tonks stated that “It can mess your body up, your mind up, and can have harsher effects than just ruining your rugby
…show more content…
We should only allow drugs that are safe and eliminate drugs that are unsafe. There is a argument for this policy based on fairness: “provided that a drug is safe, it is unfair to the honest athletes that they have to miss out on an advantage that the cheater enjoy.” (Savulescu, 2004) If drugs are legal in sport, we would develop drug to be safer for the athletes. But if drugs are illegal like how it is now, black market will be producing drug which the quality of drugs can not be assured, this leads to health risk of
Doping in sports has caused a lot of controversy throughout the years in the sports world from youth sports to the professionals. The World Anti-Doping Agency does their best to catch all the drug users but falls short with some people. This causes for an “unfair” advantage and goes against the true value of sport. It can make these players stronger and more athletic which causes more excitement for the fans to watch, more revenue for teams, and growing popularity. Using performance-enhancing drugs is banned in almost every sport, but with the allowed use of them could bring to the players and the sports teams themselves, could outweigh the negative effects of them being used in sports.
Three sub points: -There are a handful of reasons for these drugs to stay banned; the dramatic health risks associated with the use of the drugs, the recognition and respect that natural talent is the point of sports, along with the bad public image and influence on the youth.
The reference explains how performance enhancing drugs diminish the idea of participation and promote ONLY winning, ruins the ‘spirit of sport’, pose severe health risks, promote unhealthy and dangerous behaviour, and questions the ethical issues of drug advertising/ sponsorship if doping were allowed in
Sports illustrated interviewed a cohort (group of people) of elite Olympic athletes, asking, “If you were given a performance-enhancing substance, you would not be caught, and you would win, would you take it? Ninety-eight percent of athletes answered yes.”(Charleston) That is a big number. Big risk with such a small chance of success. Taking drugs to enhance your performance is just not right. Striving to get better, takes patience and perseverance. Athletes are known for their road they take to get to where they are today. Along with jail time, athletes that commit illegal acts should be banned from their sport, for their careers will never be the same, children should not look up to athletes who do those things, and the chance of losing
The principle of the sport is that every human works with the strength they are willing to attain, but doing this artificially is cheating. While there are plenty of advantages people are predisposed to like genes that give them superior fast-twitch muscle strength or long legs and arms, a pure sport by the rules should be down to physical advantages only altered by how hard athletes work for medals. Since the beginning of all games between humans, dishonesty has been discouraged. To alienate those principles could backfire when more developed countries immediately overpower weaker countries who can't afford such medical endeavors. And there's no coincidence that countries are shamed for this practice. Yet some have reason to argue that if drugs and alterations are legalized in sport this could actually be safer for athletes. Who rather than working under sketchy sources can be provided with information to make the best decision about the drugs based on specific needs. But, had there not been drugs involved in be out of tradition but integrity that athletes honor what it takes to be the best instead of cheating to get
In J. Savulescu, B.Foddy and M.Clayton’s “Why We Should Allow Performance Enhancing Drugs in Sports” (published 2004), we see their view on how performance enhancing drugs can make the sporting world a better and a much more equitable field to play in. They imply that, because of our current technological advancements, it has become easier to use performance enhancing drugs without feeling the severe side effects they used to cause. The author’s also suggest that since the punishment is just a meager six months to a year ban, while players are still being given an opportunity to earn millions in the future, banning performance enhancing drugs is a waste of time. Overall, they imply that Doping should be an action that should be embraced
Athletes should not be allowed to take Performance Enhancing drugs because they are considered cheating and they are unhealthy to whoever uses them. Using whatever type of drug to increase performance one might take is cheating. These drugs provide an unfair advantage with increased muscle mass and increased endurance. Using these drugs are also very unhealthy and they can cause long term medical issues. So, now that you have read all about this we need to stop the
Society has an odd relationship with pharmaceuticals and medical technology. If something can be said to be 'natural', we tend to be ok with it. If it seems lab-made or synthetic we tend to be wary. But even synthetic drugs and manmade technology seem to be okay if the aim is to make sick or broken people well again. Steroids and doping help pitchers to throw harder, home runs to go further, cyclists to charge for longer and sprinters to test the very limits of human speed. A huge part of watching sports is watching the pinnacle of human athletic ability, and legalizing performance enhancing drugs would only help athletes climb even higher. Radley Balko stated in an article for Reason magazine that “Sports is about exploring and
According to NPR.com, the argument over the use of performance-enhancing drugs by professional athletes has been at the center of an international ethical debate for many years (Katz). Many people argue that these drugs should be allowed, while others argue that these drugs should be banned from professional sports. Professional sports athletes should avoid the use of performance-enhancing drugs so that the integrity of sports will not be damaged.
There is always downsides to allow drugs to be legalized. Sure there may be some health concerns dealing with the use of PEDs, but there are people who know how to regulate the drug and keep them safe healthy. These people can team up with highly educated doctors that will allow them to find a way to secure the health of the user. Yet another question with this topic would be if they find a safe way for athletes to use them would people see it as a form of cheating. Is there a difference between an athlete cheating in a game or a student cheating on a big exam to help them pass the class? Performance-Enhancing drugs is not a form of cheating and they should be legal only under the circumstances of keeping the athlete health safe, and need to be regulated by sport
Performance enhancing drugs is cheating and it needs to be stopped. They need to have more restrictions and consequences for these drugs.
Athletes claim that it is up to their personal discretion to use whatever they wish to use on their body. The government should not have the authority what people decide to do with their bodies. If athletes choose to take steroids to increase their performance in the sport they take part in, then it should be their choice in doing so. Regardless of the idea that even though participating in the sports while doping will not cause harm to anyone else but themselves, there is a reason for why the rules exist in the first place. It is true that individuals have a right to their own body to do whatever they wish to do, but they do not consider that there is are important reasons for why government plays a paternal role in the debate of why PEDs cannot be legalized in sports. The intentions of why doping should remain banned in sports is because of the high risk of health issues that come with the use of PEDs like steroids and human growth hormones. Without the laws that ban doping, there could be an increase of athletes who have risked themselves with different health issues that could last long or short
The definition of performance enhancing substances is simple. They are substances that are used to improve any form of activity performance in humans. They are substances used to make you increase in skill in physical activity. The case that is being presented presenting is the fact that too many athletes in major league sports are using too many performance enhancing substances and people aren’t doing anything about it. Athletes shouldn’t be allowed to increase their strength with some substance that doesn’t require work. My reasonings for this case is the cause of health issues, providing an unfair advantage, and lastly, it sets a bad example. Therefore athletes in major league sports should not be allowed to use performance enhancing substances.
The manipulation of performance enhancing drugs will impact the sporting community in an unnecessary manner, by giving it an appalling reputation. This appalling reputation will develop as doping conveys a
spirit of sport is the celebration of the human spirit body and mind, and is