Ethical Dilemmas In The Army

Ethics Theory for the Military Professional by Chaplin (COL) Samuel D. Maloney illustrates the complex ethical decision making process. Army Leaders are responsible for professionally, and ethically develop subordinates. Developing unethical subordinates in a zero defect Army is a leadership challenge. Goal-Oriented Aspirations, Rule-Oriented Obligations, and Situation-Oriented Decisions provide leaders an understanding of the ethical decision making process. The first step to Professionally developing subordinates is identifying, and providing input on all subordinate goals. Leaders are obligated to enforce rules and regulations. Understanding subordinate character provides leaders with the information to evaluate a soldier’s integrity. However,

As I have learned over the past seven years that I have been in the Army is that accountability and responsibility are the two

I do agree with you and soldiers must set aside their personal beliefs and values if they want to survive. If someone is joining the military they must know that they may have to kill or be exposed to very violent situations. Knowing this will assist you in the situation that I discussed and with the training that you completed you will make a decision whether it is to kill or not to kill. Either way you have went against some form of your virtues. While in the military you are taught certain virtues such as honor and integrity. If you’re personal virtues are against killing you will know that you must kill as it will protect your honor and could save lives. Either way you must either go against your personal virtues or your military virtues.

As far as the grading of the APFT goes, although FM 21-20 specifies the correct way to do a push-up or sit-up, the actual scoring for these events are wildly inconsistent from grader to grader. Sometimes these inconsistencies hurt a Soldiers score, but often these inconsistencies give an unfair advantage to a Soldier over his or her peers. The inconsistencies in grading the APFT and measuring a Soldier’s body fat are magnified by those leaders who don’t even bother and just “pencil whip” the results of both.

Every organization, both large and small, will typically have a well-defined set of values that they wish to espouse. This is the template for a successful, trained work force. These values will guide individuals during the decision-making processes that they will encounter. This blue print helps to ensure the integrity of the company and the individual, as well. Our Army today is no different. We can find our values and creeds everywhere we turn. One quick trip to a company or battalion headquarters will yield all the information a Soldier ever needs to assist them in making ethical choices. We hang posters touting the seven Army values on every wall. Units will prominently display the

I would not use situational ethics to resolve the problem with the general in regards to the typo in the performance report because I do not think that it needs to be apply to this situation. However, I will apply the Army values in resolving the problem that is at hand. I will apply duty to this situation because I would be true faith to another soldier, so I would support my leader by making the necessary correction and addressing them with it, this would show my support to my unit. The general may have look over the mistake but that is where duty would play a part because the Army is one team one fight. Seen that Lt. Colonel saw the mistake he should address it because looking out for his promotion should be a reason he allow one

The military and civilian employees encounter many ethical challenges throughout their career as professionals. In this essay I will identify some of the current ethical challenges military members’ face, while also recognizing current professional ethical challenges government civilians face. In concluding, I will identify things that can be done to help remedy some of the situations or keep those situations from getting worse.

The importance of integrity in the army is a steadfast, core value that is expressed in terms of constancy and consistency. As professionals in the military, we must practice high standards of integrity. Leaders and subordinates alike need a high level of integrity within the working environment on or off the battlefield. It is integrity that is the glue holds the relationships of all soldiers together. Without integrity or a lack thereof, the relationship is impossible. In other words, a lack or perceived lack of integrity can have a devastating effect on the military profession. Along with integrity, there is trust. One needs to trust that their counterpart, superior, or subordinate that they will exercise integrity in any given situation.

Professionals in the United States Army stand apart from others engaged in particular careers in the civilian world. While many vocations contain some of the characteristics of professional, a lot of careers do not include all of the elements necessary to distinguish themselves as being as close to a professional as a United States soldier. Professionalism grows depending on the time and service they have in the Army. A professional has specialized knowledge and skill which can only be acquired through prolonged education and experience. Such skill and experience form the basis of objective standards of professional competence that separate the practicing professional from their peers and

I think in order to understand ethics and the impact that it can have on you as an instructor and your students. To do this you must first understand the meaning of the word, ethics. All and sundry will devise their own definition of ethics, including myself. Baseline knowledge, ethics can stem from a number of areas such as the place or time period you were born also your upbringing. They can also be introduced to us based on our current positions, such as our place of work. The army instills in us the Army Values within those values we may be looked upon to make ethical decisions. The (Merriam-Webster) dictionary defines ethics as the, “discipline dealing with what is good and bad and with moral duty plus obligation”. My definition of

As a soldier in the military, follow commander’s order is their duty. Regardless of what soldiers were thinking about the war, as long as they put on the uniform, they are the soldiers, they are the one that fight for their people and their country; they have to follow their commander’s direction and order. Many soldiers choose to participate in the war due to their family needs, but later, after their training period in the military, they started to build their sense of duty and have an image of what they are going to do in this war, however, they often ignore the reality hidden behind the war. Both Bloods, Black Veterans of the Vietnam War: An oral

Morals are definitely a standard that is set by society as an indicator for right and wrong. The tactic of applying morals works well, especially when being used in the military, law enforcement and the judicial system. These standards put self-guidance on the individual to ensure that they maintain a behavior, which allows them to follow and adhere to any code of ethics within their particular department. Getting new as well as potential, employees to buy into the department’s morals starts with early introduction of the expected standards. Especially, during training, implementing morals and values as a core expectation will extend throughout that potential cadet’s career. The military uses this tactic during basic training, they preach integrity

CASE REPORT: A U.S. Navy Nurse Corps officer with 18 years of active duty service faces a command inquiry for the refusal to carry out a lawful military order. The nurse is assigned to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba where he attends to the medical needs of the detainees imprisoned there as part of the U.S. war on terrorism. Many of the prisoners, some of whom have been held at Gitmo since the events of September 11, 2001, have chosen to engage in hunger strikes in order to protest their internment and the prison conditions. The Navy leadership at Gitmo decided that the prisoners were to eat and ordered forced

The ethical dilemma for scenario 2 is whether you should use you knowledge of the attack to save people from dying in the planned attack, or take no action, keep your knowledge of the code a secret and potentially win the war in two years. The question is, will more lives be saved in the future if the knowledge of the code is kept a secret, or will more lives be saved if they prevent the planned bombing. This dilemma doesn’t break any rules of just war theory. The only potential challenge to this would be the probability of success. The dilemma isn’t as much about just war theory as it is about the value of life. Is it oaky to sacrifice the lives of the people in the city in hopes of winning the war? My character would probably keep their

Moral is the concerns to what is right and wrong in human behavior (Merriam-Webster). As chaplains, we are agents of what right looks like in all moral issues in the Army. Many moral issues affects the lives of Soldiers, Civilians, and Families, affecting effectiveness of service command climate, unit readiness, and cohesion (AR 165–1, 9–10a). From the lowest private to the highest-ranking officer, we all need to promote a moral develop in our organization and the Army posses a Moral Leadership Training (MLT) program to help all of us accomplish it.