Ethical Effects Of Syphilis

The major ethical faults with the syphilis study conducted and treatment of homosexuals during the early years are consent. I feel that it is necessary for any study or treatment to have informed consent from a patient or subject. The patient or subject of the research study must be able to understand the dangers of the treatment. For a treatment to follow ethical principles, the rights of each person and their families should be

The issues that were involved in the violation of the ethical principles involving human subjects include racism, paternalism, informed consent, truth telling, scientism, and whistle blowing. There were other issues that were involved in this study: double standards, maleficence, and the use of deception in research among others. The issue of racism was seen clearly in this study. Four hundred black persons were infected and two hundred served as a control group. Caucasians were not enrolled in this study. This was a violation of justice because the subjects were not treated

There are a multitude of constituents that could be modified to make these unprincipled studies ethical for subjects. The Tuskegee syphilis study was an unscrupulous experiment that illustrated the significance of morality in human experimentations. A noteworthy alteration that would be made is guaranteeing that every participant in experiments are given a full assessment of the dangers that can arise from the experiment. Consent was an element that was fundamentally nonexistent in the Tuskegee syphilis experiment, resulting in the study being expressively immoral. In addition, a momentous ethical and legal issue involved in the Tuskegee study were the counterfeited information given to the subjects and the community. David Smolin, the author of the “Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, Social Change, and the Future

The Tuskegee study is a prime example of why ethical treatment is necessary. This study took place in 1932 and dealt with African Americans who had contracted Syphilis. They were told they would get free medical exams, free meals, and burial insurance in exchange for participating in the study. The catch was that the people participating in the study who had syphilis were not treated properly. Even when penicillin became the main treatment for syphilis, the patients were not given it and were not given the option to leave the study when this happened. Ultimately, the study got shut down because it was considered unethical due to the fact that the patients were not given enough information to give real informed consent.

The Tuskegee Syphilis Study was the experiment conducted by US public health service among 600 black men to study about the disease named syphilis from 1932 to 1972 (CDC,2016).The participants were poor rural African-American living in Macon County ,Alabama. The study was done to find out the effects of untreated syphilis on those men. The participants were introduced the disease with the name -Bad Blood by the researchers(Jones,p.5). The researchers ran the experiment for over 40 years. During this period, the participants were kept unknown about the causes and treatment of the syphilis .The treatment of syphilis was found but the researchers did not apply on the participants(Tuskegee,2016). The Tuskegee Syphilis Study was unethical and

The Tuskegee syphilis study highlighted the effects of untreated syphilis in African American males by withholding syphilis treatment that was available to these men. In addition, Tuskegee syphilis study demonstrated how the participants’ rights were taken for granted or even minimized in order to obtain information on how the human body was affected by untreated syphilis. This study allows one to view how the ethical rights were violated and allows for guidelines to be established preventing future occurrence.

From 1932 to 1972 the Tuskegee Syphilis Study took place and greatly affected a vulnerable population of African American men living in Macon County, Alabama. "The Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male" conducted by the U.S Public Health Service was a violation of human rights and completely dismissed the Nuremburg Code. 600 individuals who were poor, illiterate and had never received medical care were taken advantage of. The patients did not offer informed consent and were lied to by the government. They were told they were receiving treatment for "bad blood", however they were only being monitored as their syphilis progressed (Tuskegee University, 2016). This paper is designed to apply ethical principles such as respect, beneficence,

(II) The government knew the participants had syphilis and failed to treat them. (III) The Public Health Service failed to fully disclose to the participants that they had syphilis, that they were participating in the study, and that treatment was available for syphilis. (IV) The Public Health Service led the participants to believe that they were being properly treated for whatever diseases they had, when in fact, they were not being meaningfully treated. (V) The Public Health service failed to obtain the participants’ written consents to be a part of the study. (VI) The study was racially motivated and discriminated against African Americans in that no whites were selected to participate in the study (VII) There were no rules and regulations governing the study.

The subjects in this experiment were in fact affected in great deals. They suffered throughout most of their life, from the point of infection all the way until death. While there were medicines available that had the ability to cure those who were sick, the subjects were so illiterate and undereducated that they had no way of knowing about what was going on. The doctors abused all of the patients and crossed several boundaries between personal rights and hospital rights. They lied to the black men, assuring them that they were curing the syphilis. However, not once throughout the entire experiment, did the doctors reveal the truth. Lies were weaved in and out as days, months, and the years of the study went by. Skloot explains in her article, “Taking the Least of You,” that during a court case in 1984 involving patient rights and patient property, the judges ruled, “‘A patient must have the ultimate control of what becomes of his or her tissues. To hold otherwise would open the door to a massive invasion of human privacy and dignity in the name of medical progress’” (Skloot 4). Not only did the doctors of the study abuse the men’s personal rights during the experiment, they also affected them long-term, after the first six months of the study. Brandt explains in his article that, “During the forty years of the experiment, the USPHS had

The history of research ethics begins with tragic historical cases of unethical research and how they contributed toward present values and ethics in research. One of these historical tragic studies was the Tuskegee Syphilis Study conducted by the U.S. Public Health Service in Macon County, Alabama. This post will discuss the unethical behavior of that study.

The doctors and the nurse were more interested in gathering scientific data than showing concern for these African men’s human rights. There was no concern for the ethical issues involving these victims. The syphilis scientific study was written about in medical journals for many years but community outrage did not happen until a reporter exposed the study to the general public. The scientific syphilis study ended after it was exposed to the public.

Several of these men died due to having syphilis and not being treated. “After the study ended, those men who had syphilis, along with their wives and children who had contracted the disease, were given free antibiotics and lifetime medical care” (Fain, 2017, p. 27). Forty years after the study was over, all survivors were offered penicillin and free medical treatment for life from the Public Health Service. The lawsuit that took place after the study, awarded $37,500 to each survivor and $15,000 to the heirs of “deceased survivors.” If this study would have been conducted today, it would have breached several provisions of the Nursing Code of Ethics.

Despite having penicillin available which is the cure for Syphilis, the participants were purposely left untreated, therefore; allowing a curable disease to take its course for the selfish purposes of this study. This intentional act allowed the group of African-American sharecroppers from Macon County, Alabama to knowingly engage in sexual activity with women and they were also exposed to this disease. Which resulted in an entire sector of society being exposed to the Syphilis disease who were not given treatment as a result of the researchers and medical practitioners choice to not disclose information pertinent to their disease and choice to withhold treatment. The participants were never given a choice about continuing in the study once penicillin did become available and they were actually prevented from getting treatment. This in essence, also violated the rights of the participants; putting them in grave danger and at the same time exposed many of these participants even to

399 African American men whom lived in the area were infected with syphilis. A violation of ethical started with the men never being told that they actually had syphilis just “bad blood” and they didn’t try to treat them. The men were told if they tried to get any treatment their USPHS treatment would be discontinue. They also didn’t consent to participate and didn’t have a clear understanding of the process. Some of the men died.

Although it is easily preventable, over 36,000 cases of syphilis are reported annually in the United States alone (“STD Facts-Syphilis” 2010). Treponema pallidum is the bacterium that causes syphilis. Being one of the most common STDs, syphilis is a bacterial sexually transmitted disease that acts quite differently from the other common STDs because it acts in stages. Fortunately, there are antibiotics to cure syphilis; however, there are not cures for the other health related problems that it causes.