Ethical Theory Of Deontology

Deontology or also know as Deontology ethics is an approach that is taken that determines the goodness and rightness of a specific act or rules and duties that a specific person has to perform. Deontology is the complete opposite of consequentialism. Consequentialism is the where the outcome of an act has a major influence and not the actual act itself. In better words it is what comes after the action that is made and not the action itself. As for deontology an action can be considered right or something acceptable even if the outcome of the action is something bad. A perfect example for deontology would be “ do onto others what you would have them do onto you.” This is just something that

Deontology is an ethical position that examines the morality of an action based on the action’s adherence to rule or rules. Many times is described as obligation or rule based ethics (Alexander). Therefore, the only actions that are considered moral are those that are performed solely for one’s duty to the moral law rather than one’s desire. Deontology is the school of thought that Kant comes from. Immanuel Kant was a critical figure in philosophy in the modern age. His work was the foundation of the most famous form of Deontology.

Deontological ethics or deontology is the normative ethical position that judges the morality of an action based on the action's adherence to a rule or rules. In this terminology action is more important than the consequences. Even if the outcome appears to be beneficial, the immoral purposes or actions cannot be

As chief nephrologist of the legal and ethical hospital, it has come to my attention that our kidney dialysis appointments have a limited availability. A shortage in a key component has made it impossible to acquire more equipment in the immediate future. As of 9/5/2015, there will be a new methodology in place to ensure we are able to provide the greatest amount of good possible for as many patients. Nurses and receptionists will need to inform any patients attempting to schedule an appointment of the new procedures and professionally explain how a shortage of supplies has limited area hospitals.

Ethics in the decision making process is a topic which is highly complex. One who wishes to investigate this topic will find an abundance of theories and approaches relating to the ethical implications of the decision making process. Two of the more dominant approaches in the study of ethical decision making are the utilitarian approach and the deontological approach. Many researchers have questioned which of these two approaches offers the best means of achieving ethically sound decisions. In order to fully investigate which of these two approaches is superior, it is necessary to first establish a definition of both approaches.

Deontology based ethics relies on acts themselves, rather than the consequence of the act, to determine the morality of a situation. The ethics of deontology places special emphasis on the relationship between duty and the morality of human actions. Under this form of ethical behaviour, one cannot justify the morality of an action by showing that the result or consequence was good. Deontological ethics makes it imperative that a person fulfil’s his or her duty to act accordingly, despite a bed result. The two deontology based principles, the ‘Hypothetical Imperative’ and the ‘Categorical Imperative’, are described by deontology’s most influential philosopher, Immanuel Kant.

Kant believed in three things to test the moral worth of an action;

Unlike the utilitarian approach, deontology emphasizes the individual and does not stress the consequences of individual actions. The Golden Rule of deontology is “do onto others as you would have them do onto you” (CITATION). An example of the practice of deontology in the health care field is the interaction between the healthcare provider and the patient. It is instilled in the provider to treat their patients as they would want their family members to be treated by a health professional. Northwell Health instituted a culture of CARE (connectedness, awareness, respect, empathy) across the organization emphasizing the importance of the Golden Rule.

In Western beliefs, there are three original ethical theory approaches. Each has the prospect to generate an unlike ending to the similar matter. The first one discussed by our textbook was utilitarianism. This hypothesis is mainly focused on the best potential ending for the majority citizens, or which answer will do the slightest amount of damage. One example the book provided was having to kill a tyrant to defend the life of lots of targets. Another advance provided was the deontology theory. This technique searches for the most ethical solution. So, using the same concern offered for utilitarianism, the result with deontology would be not to kill the tyrant because even his existence is essential. The third approach is called virtue ethics, which is entirely unlike from the earlier two because it focuses on the individual performing the conclusion rather than the penalty. in

Deontological view and utilitarianism (also called teleological view) are the two prevailing ethics systems advocated for accounting profession. The presence of codes of ethics in accounting as well as various rules of conduct point to a deontological view favored by the profession since it is supported by and is consistent with the AICPA Code of professional conduct (Liberty University, 2016).

I have chosen to apply deontology to my cause because I am advocating against the morally wrong action of discrimination against visually impaired persons during hiring. The deontology approach focuses on the rightness or wrongness of an action based on its adherence to a universal law. There is a duty of organizations, and in this case, companies to act in fair and impartial ways and ways that benefit the society. Society includes the visually impaired as well as the able-bodied. Thus, according to its duty, companies should hire employees in a way that ensures that all members of the society have an equal chance at securing a job according to their abilities and aptitude. With appropriate tools, the disabled can be as competent as the able-bodied.

The opponents argued that the deontology framework was unacceptable. It created impractical standard which cannot be used in catastrophic circumstances. The scholars who disregard the tortured justification on deontological frameworks argued that torture may be justified under certain circumstances from consequential grounds. Bufacchi and Arrigo (2006) believed that if it is the lesser of two evils and is better to avoid the great one. The ticking bomb scenario was acknowledged to describe the situation in which using torture so as to gain the information about the location of the ticking bomb from the terrorist. In examining, using torture can be regarded as the lesser evil so as then to prevent the greater evil. To develop this argument,

Virtue ethics combined with deontological ethics, in my opinion, determine good guidelines for human behavior. Virtue ethics is based upon ability to live in community with other human beings. Deontological utilizes rules to define appropriate human behavior.

According to me Dr. Duck should first check the woman who had complications during delivery with twins, if it is a life threatening case then he should treat them first because all the 3 lives are at risk. And if it is non-life threatening then the doctor should treat the robber who has life threatening injuries. I would say, normative, consequential, utilitarian and deontological theories would apply here. Yes, situational ethics, justice and bias could play a vital role in the decision making process.

Kant’s theory of deontology and Mill’s theory of utilitarianism provide starkly different approaches to assigning moral value to ethical dilemmas, two modern dilemmas being commercial surrogacy and physician-assisted suicide. This essay will expound upon the process of deciding moral value within each ethical theory and then apply this decision process to the two ethical dilemmas. Arguments will be posited in support or in opposition to the proposed ethical dilemmas according to the ethical theories. The discussion will revolve around the theories as proposed by the specific authors mentioned above in their relevant works.

Ethics, also known as moral philosophy, is a subject of philosophy that engages itself in systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong. It investigates questions of right and wrong and of the best way of living for people. In this essay I am going to explain the differences between the ethical schools of consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics and argue that in my opinion deontology is the most reasonable theory of the three.